瑞芬太尼对全身麻醉下剖宫产患者插管条件的影响:两种给药方案的比较

M. Kutlesic, R. Kutlesic, T. Ilić-Mostić, D. Stanišić
{"title":"瑞芬太尼对全身麻醉下剖宫产患者插管条件的影响:两种给药方案的比较","authors":"M. Kutlesic, R. Kutlesic, T. Ilić-Mostić, D. Stanišić","doi":"10.22190/FUMB180602005K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of our study was to compare the effects of two remifentanil dosing regimens, used during induction-delivery period of cesarean section, and of remifentanil-free control on maternal intubating conditions and hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation as well as on neonatal outcome. Seventy seven ASA physical status I-II women with singleton term pregnancy, who were scheduled for elective cesarean section in general anesthesia and have given written informed consent, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study and divided in three groups: A - 31 patient received 1 µg/kg remifentanil bolus before the induction of anesthesia, followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min remifentanil infusion that was stopped after the skin incision; B - 27 patients received only 1 µg/kg remifentanil bolus; C - 19 patients did not receive remifentanil until the delivery of the baby. Intubating conditions were qualified as excellent, good or poor. Group A had significantly higher number of patients with excellent intubating conditions (p = 0.011); majority of patients with good intubating conditions were in group C (p = 0.017). Systolic, diastolic, main arterial pressure and heart rate raised significantly in group C compared to A and B (p < 0.001). Neonatal outcome did not differ between groups – all neonates were vital with first minute Apgar scores ≥ 8. In conclusion, our dosing regimen of remifentanil 1µg/kg bolus given immediately before the induction followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min interrupted after skin incision provided the best compromise between the achievement of excellent intubating conditions, attenuation of maternal hemodynamic stress response to endotracheal intubation and avoidance of neonatal respiratory depression.","PeriodicalId":167216,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Medicine and Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF REMIFENTANIL ON INTUBATION CONDITIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CAESAREAN DELIVERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA: COMPARISON OF TWO DOSING REGIMENS\",\"authors\":\"M. Kutlesic, R. Kutlesic, T. Ilić-Mostić, D. Stanišić\",\"doi\":\"10.22190/FUMB180602005K\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of our study was to compare the effects of two remifentanil dosing regimens, used during induction-delivery period of cesarean section, and of remifentanil-free control on maternal intubating conditions and hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation as well as on neonatal outcome. Seventy seven ASA physical status I-II women with singleton term pregnancy, who were scheduled for elective cesarean section in general anesthesia and have given written informed consent, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study and divided in three groups: A - 31 patient received 1 µg/kg remifentanil bolus before the induction of anesthesia, followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min remifentanil infusion that was stopped after the skin incision; B - 27 patients received only 1 µg/kg remifentanil bolus; C - 19 patients did not receive remifentanil until the delivery of the baby. Intubating conditions were qualified as excellent, good or poor. Group A had significantly higher number of patients with excellent intubating conditions (p = 0.011); majority of patients with good intubating conditions were in group C (p = 0.017). Systolic, diastolic, main arterial pressure and heart rate raised significantly in group C compared to A and B (p < 0.001). Neonatal outcome did not differ between groups – all neonates were vital with first minute Apgar scores ≥ 8. In conclusion, our dosing regimen of remifentanil 1µg/kg bolus given immediately before the induction followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min interrupted after skin incision provided the best compromise between the achievement of excellent intubating conditions, attenuation of maternal hemodynamic stress response to endotracheal intubation and avoidance of neonatal respiratory depression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facta Universitatis, Series: Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facta Universitatis, Series: Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22190/FUMB180602005K\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/FUMB180602005K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较剖宫产引产期间使用的两种瑞芬太尼给药方案和无瑞芬太尼对照对产妇插管条件和气管插管血流动力学反应以及新生儿结局的影响。77例ASA身体状态为I-II的单胎足妊娠妇女,经书面知情同意,计划在全麻下择期剖宫产,纳入这项前瞻性、随机对照研究,分为三组:A - 31例患者在麻醉诱导前接受1µg/kg瑞芬太尼丸,随后0.15µg/kg/min输注瑞芬太尼,皮肤切口后停止输注;B - 27例患者仅给予1µg/kg瑞芬太尼丸;C - 19例患者直到分娩后才接受瑞芬太尼治疗。插管条件分为优、良、差三个等级。A组插管条件良好的患者数量显著高于对照组(p = 0.011);插管条件良好的患者以C组居多(p = 0.017)。与A组和B组相比,C组收缩压、舒张压、主动脉压和心率显著升高(p < 0.001)。新生儿结局在两组之间没有差异-所有新生儿在第一分钟Apgar评分≥8时都是至关重要的。综上所述,我们的给药方案瑞芬太尼在诱导前立即给药1µg/kg,然后在皮肤切开后中断0.15µg/kg/min,在获得良好的插管条件、衰减母体对气管插管的血流动力学应激反应和避免新生儿呼吸抑制之间提供了最佳折衷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF REMIFENTANIL ON INTUBATION CONDITIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CAESAREAN DELIVERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA: COMPARISON OF TWO DOSING REGIMENS
The objective of our study was to compare the effects of two remifentanil dosing regimens, used during induction-delivery period of cesarean section, and of remifentanil-free control on maternal intubating conditions and hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation as well as on neonatal outcome. Seventy seven ASA physical status I-II women with singleton term pregnancy, who were scheduled for elective cesarean section in general anesthesia and have given written informed consent, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study and divided in three groups: A - 31 patient received 1 µg/kg remifentanil bolus before the induction of anesthesia, followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min remifentanil infusion that was stopped after the skin incision; B - 27 patients received only 1 µg/kg remifentanil bolus; C - 19 patients did not receive remifentanil until the delivery of the baby. Intubating conditions were qualified as excellent, good or poor. Group A had significantly higher number of patients with excellent intubating conditions (p = 0.011); majority of patients with good intubating conditions were in group C (p = 0.017). Systolic, diastolic, main arterial pressure and heart rate raised significantly in group C compared to A and B (p < 0.001). Neonatal outcome did not differ between groups – all neonates were vital with first minute Apgar scores ≥ 8. In conclusion, our dosing regimen of remifentanil 1µg/kg bolus given immediately before the induction followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min interrupted after skin incision provided the best compromise between the achievement of excellent intubating conditions, attenuation of maternal hemodynamic stress response to endotracheal intubation and avoidance of neonatal respiratory depression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信