赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院分离的金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌对万古霉素的耐药性:我们应该担心吗?

Matenge Mutalange, Kaunda Yamba, Chiristine Kapesa, Frank Mtonga, Masiye Banda, J. Muma, B. M. Hangombe, L. Hachaambwa, F. Bumbangi, G. Kwenda, M. Samutela
{"title":"赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院分离的金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌对万古霉素的耐药性:我们应该担心吗?","authors":"Matenge Mutalange, Kaunda Yamba, Chiristine Kapesa, Frank Mtonga, Masiye Banda, J. Muma, B. M. Hangombe, L. Hachaambwa, F. Bumbangi, G. Kwenda, M. Samutela","doi":"10.53974/unza.jabs.5.1.482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species cause invasive infections such as bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Despite vancomycin being the drug of choice for drug-resistant infections caused by these species, few studies have been conducted to ascertain vancomycin resistance in the African setting. This is crucial given the rising resistance in these organisms. This study aimed to isolate S. aureus and Enterococcus species and determine their susceptibility to vancomycin and other antibiotics at the University Teaching Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which S. aureus and Enterococcus spp isolates from the skin, soft tissue and bloodstream infections were included. Standard microbiological and Kirby-Baur (disc diffusion and E-strips) methods were used to identify and determine the susceptibility of the organisms, respectively. Results: From 59 S. aureus isolates, 37 were from the skin and soft tissue and 22 from blood culture. Twenty-six (44.1%) of these were Methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Thirty-nine Enterococcus were isolated from blood cultures only. Of the S. aureus (16) and Enterococcus (14) isolates tested with vancomycin E-strips, none were vancomycin-resistant. However, 12.5% S. aureus and 14.3% Enterococcus showed intermediate vancomycin susceptibility. S. aureus were resistant to penicillin (93.2%), erythromycin (52.5%) and tetracycline (50.8%). Enterococcus showed resistance to penicillin (83%) and tetracycline (84.6%). Conclusions: There was no vancomycin resistance among S. aureus and Enterococcus, implying vancomycin is still a viable treatment option for invasive infections. Given the intermediate vancomycin susceptibility, treatment guided by minimum inhibitory concentration results, continued surveillance and prudent use are key.","PeriodicalId":224135,"journal":{"name":"University of Zambia Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus Species isolated at the University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia: Should We Be Worried?\",\"authors\":\"Matenge Mutalange, Kaunda Yamba, Chiristine Kapesa, Frank Mtonga, Masiye Banda, J. Muma, B. M. Hangombe, L. Hachaambwa, F. Bumbangi, G. Kwenda, M. Samutela\",\"doi\":\"10.53974/unza.jabs.5.1.482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species cause invasive infections such as bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Despite vancomycin being the drug of choice for drug-resistant infections caused by these species, few studies have been conducted to ascertain vancomycin resistance in the African setting. This is crucial given the rising resistance in these organisms. This study aimed to isolate S. aureus and Enterococcus species and determine their susceptibility to vancomycin and other antibiotics at the University Teaching Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which S. aureus and Enterococcus spp isolates from the skin, soft tissue and bloodstream infections were included. Standard microbiological and Kirby-Baur (disc diffusion and E-strips) methods were used to identify and determine the susceptibility of the organisms, respectively. Results: From 59 S. aureus isolates, 37 were from the skin and soft tissue and 22 from blood culture. Twenty-six (44.1%) of these were Methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Thirty-nine Enterococcus were isolated from blood cultures only. Of the S. aureus (16) and Enterococcus (14) isolates tested with vancomycin E-strips, none were vancomycin-resistant. However, 12.5% S. aureus and 14.3% Enterococcus showed intermediate vancomycin susceptibility. S. aureus were resistant to penicillin (93.2%), erythromycin (52.5%) and tetracycline (50.8%). Enterococcus showed resistance to penicillin (83%) and tetracycline (84.6%). Conclusions: There was no vancomycin resistance among S. aureus and Enterococcus, implying vancomycin is still a viable treatment option for invasive infections. Given the intermediate vancomycin susceptibility, treatment guided by minimum inhibitory concentration results, continued surveillance and prudent use are key.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Zambia Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Zambia Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53974/unza.jabs.5.1.482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Zambia Journal of Agricultural and Biomedical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53974/unza.jabs.5.1.482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌引起侵袭性感染,如菌血症和感染性心内膜炎。尽管万古霉素是这些物种引起的耐药感染的首选药物,但在非洲环境中进行的确定万古霉素耐药性的研究很少。鉴于这些生物的耐药性日益增强,这一点至关重要。本研究旨在分离赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院的金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌,并确定它们对万古霉素和其他抗生素的敏感性。方法:这是一项横断面研究,其中包括从皮肤、软组织和血液感染中分离的金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌。分别采用标准微生物法和Kirby-Baur法(圆盘扩散法和e条法)对病原菌进行药敏鉴定。结果:59株金黄色葡萄球菌中,皮肤及软组织分离37株,血培养分离22株。其中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌26例(44.1%)。仅从血培养中分离出39株肠球菌。在用万古霉素e条检测的金黄色葡萄球菌(16株)和肠球菌(14株)中,没有一株对万古霉素耐药。而12.5%的金黄色葡萄球菌和14.3%的肠球菌对万古霉素呈中等敏感性。金黄色葡萄球菌对青霉素(93.2%)、红霉素(52.5%)和四环素(50.8%)耐药。肠球菌对青霉素(83%)和四环素(84.6%)耐药。结论:金黄色葡萄球菌和肠球菌对万古霉素无耐药性,提示万古霉素仍是侵袭性感染的可行治疗选择。鉴于万古霉素的中间敏感性,以最小抑制浓度结果为指导的治疗,持续监测和谨慎使用是关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vancomycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus Species isolated at the University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia: Should We Be Worried?
Background: Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species cause invasive infections such as bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Despite vancomycin being the drug of choice for drug-resistant infections caused by these species, few studies have been conducted to ascertain vancomycin resistance in the African setting. This is crucial given the rising resistance in these organisms. This study aimed to isolate S. aureus and Enterococcus species and determine their susceptibility to vancomycin and other antibiotics at the University Teaching Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which S. aureus and Enterococcus spp isolates from the skin, soft tissue and bloodstream infections were included. Standard microbiological and Kirby-Baur (disc diffusion and E-strips) methods were used to identify and determine the susceptibility of the organisms, respectively. Results: From 59 S. aureus isolates, 37 were from the skin and soft tissue and 22 from blood culture. Twenty-six (44.1%) of these were Methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Thirty-nine Enterococcus were isolated from blood cultures only. Of the S. aureus (16) and Enterococcus (14) isolates tested with vancomycin E-strips, none were vancomycin-resistant. However, 12.5% S. aureus and 14.3% Enterococcus showed intermediate vancomycin susceptibility. S. aureus were resistant to penicillin (93.2%), erythromycin (52.5%) and tetracycline (50.8%). Enterococcus showed resistance to penicillin (83%) and tetracycline (84.6%). Conclusions: There was no vancomycin resistance among S. aureus and Enterococcus, implying vancomycin is still a viable treatment option for invasive infections. Given the intermediate vancomycin susceptibility, treatment guided by minimum inhibitory concentration results, continued surveillance and prudent use are key.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信