{"title":"社区酒吧的实地考察:理论与实践的不匹配","authors":"N. R. Herrera, G. McEwan, S. Greenberg","doi":"10.1145/1316624.1316638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community Bar (CB) is groupware supporting informal awareness and casual interaction. CB's design was derived from three sources: prior empirical research findings concerning informal awareness and casual interaction, a comprehensive sociological theory called the Locales Framework, and the Focus/Nimbus model of awareness. We conducted a field study of a group's on-going CB use. We use its results to reflect upon the matches and mis-matches that occurred between the theoretical and actual usage behaviors anticipated by our design principles vs. those observed in our deployment. As a critique, this reflectionis an important iterative step in recognizing flaws not just as usability problems, but as an incorrect translation of theory into design that can be re-analyzed from a theoretical perspective.","PeriodicalId":445069,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A field study of community bar: (mis)-matches between theory and practice\",\"authors\":\"N. R. Herrera, G. McEwan, S. Greenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1316624.1316638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Community Bar (CB) is groupware supporting informal awareness and casual interaction. CB's design was derived from three sources: prior empirical research findings concerning informal awareness and casual interaction, a comprehensive sociological theory called the Locales Framework, and the Focus/Nimbus model of awareness. We conducted a field study of a group's on-going CB use. We use its results to reflect upon the matches and mis-matches that occurred between the theoretical and actual usage behaviors anticipated by our design principles vs. those observed in our deployment. As a critique, this reflectionis an important iterative step in recognizing flaws not just as usability problems, but as an incorrect translation of theory into design that can be re-analyzed from a theoretical perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26
摘要
Community Bar (CB)是支持非正式意识和随意互动的群件。CB的设计来源于三个来源:先前关于非正式意识和随意互动的实证研究结果,一个名为Locales框架的综合社会学理论,以及意识的Focus/Nimbus模型。我们对一个群体正在进行的垃圾使用情况进行了实地调查。我们使用其结果来反映设计原则所预期的理论和实际使用行为与部署中观察到的使用行为之间的匹配和不匹配。作为一种批评,这种反思是一个重要的迭代步骤,它不仅可以识别可用性问题,而且可以从理论角度重新分析理论到设计的错误翻译。
A field study of community bar: (mis)-matches between theory and practice
Community Bar (CB) is groupware supporting informal awareness and casual interaction. CB's design was derived from three sources: prior empirical research findings concerning informal awareness and casual interaction, a comprehensive sociological theory called the Locales Framework, and the Focus/Nimbus model of awareness. We conducted a field study of a group's on-going CB use. We use its results to reflect upon the matches and mis-matches that occurred between the theoretical and actual usage behaviors anticipated by our design principles vs. those observed in our deployment. As a critique, this reflectionis an important iterative step in recognizing flaws not just as usability problems, but as an incorrect translation of theory into design that can be re-analyzed from a theoretical perspective.