黎巴嫩宪法委员会:封锁通道以保护共识制度?

Nizar Saghieh
{"title":"黎巴嫩宪法委员会:封锁通道以保护共识制度?","authors":"Nizar Saghieh","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Lebanese Constitutional Council is vested with the power of assessing the constitutionality of laws and annulling unconstitutional ones. All the other bodies of the State are obliged to apply the laws as long as they have not been declared unconstitutional. From the perspective of strategic litigation on questions of fundamental rights, in view of the limited competences of the Lebanese Constitutional Council to decide on constitution-ality of laws, this chapter discusses the historical background and reasons for the current situation of very limited control of the laws’ constitutionality. It sheds light on the prevailing political characteristics and perception of the Council’s role at his creation and shows the Council’ stance by examples of various political, legislative and its’ own Council’s decisions, arguing for the need not just to reform Lebanon’s Constitutional Council, but the perception and role it is driven into by the current political system of consensus.","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lebanon’s Constitutional Council: Access Blocked to Protect the Consensus System?\",\"authors\":\"Nizar Saghieh\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748912019-119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Lebanese Constitutional Council is vested with the power of assessing the constitutionality of laws and annulling unconstitutional ones. All the other bodies of the State are obliged to apply the laws as long as they have not been declared unconstitutional. From the perspective of strategic litigation on questions of fundamental rights, in view of the limited competences of the Lebanese Constitutional Council to decide on constitution-ality of laws, this chapter discusses the historical background and reasons for the current situation of very limited control of the laws’ constitutionality. It sheds light on the prevailing political characteristics and perception of the Council’s role at his creation and shows the Council’ stance by examples of various political, legislative and its’ own Council’s decisions, arguing for the need not just to reform Lebanon’s Constitutional Council, but the perception and role it is driven into by the current political system of consensus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黎巴嫩宪法委员会被赋予评估法律的合宪性和废除违宪法律的权力。只要法律未被宣布违宪,国家的所有其他机构都有义务实施这些法律。本章从基本权利问题的战略诉讼角度出发,考虑到黎巴嫩宪法委员会决定法律合宪性的权限有限,讨论了对法律合宪性控制非常有限的现状的历史背景和原因。它揭示了黎巴嫩宪法委员会创立时的主流政治特征和对其作用的看法,并通过各种政治、立法和委员会自身决定的例子表明了委员会的立场,认为不仅需要改革黎巴嫩宪法委员会,而且需要改革目前政治共识制度所推动的看法和作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lebanon’s Constitutional Council: Access Blocked to Protect the Consensus System?
The Lebanese Constitutional Council is vested with the power of assessing the constitutionality of laws and annulling unconstitutional ones. All the other bodies of the State are obliged to apply the laws as long as they have not been declared unconstitutional. From the perspective of strategic litigation on questions of fundamental rights, in view of the limited competences of the Lebanese Constitutional Council to decide on constitution-ality of laws, this chapter discusses the historical background and reasons for the current situation of very limited control of the laws’ constitutionality. It sheds light on the prevailing political characteristics and perception of the Council’s role at his creation and shows the Council’ stance by examples of various political, legislative and its’ own Council’s decisions, arguing for the need not just to reform Lebanon’s Constitutional Council, but the perception and role it is driven into by the current political system of consensus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信