Michal Ďurovič, Libor Jůn, Vítězslav Knotek, David Majtenyi
{"title":"„Radila jsem se již několikrát s archiváři...“ – několik poznámek k problematice fyzického stavu a konzervace rukopisu Julia Fučíka Reportáž, psaná na oprátce","authors":"Michal Ďurovič, Libor Jůn, Vítězslav Knotek, David Majtenyi","doi":"10.37520/cnm.2020.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Julius Fučík’s most important literary work, Notes from the Gallows, is one of the most translated Czech texts, as well as one of the most controversial. Whether it was caused by the extraordinary life story and extravagant personality of its author, communist journalist and resistance fighter Julius Fučík (1903–1943), or the long-lasting dispute concerning both its contents and circumstances of its origin. Yet, the authenticity of the text was finally subsustimated by the expert forensic report in the early 1990s. At the same time, however, the suspicion of the censorship of Fučík’s original text was confirmed. Even though the book was repeatedly published, its manuscript remained inaccessible to the public as the property of Fučík’s widow Gusta Fučíková (1903–1987). It was only after her death in 1987 when the original Fučík’s autograph became a part of the collection of the Klement Gottwald Museum, a party museum controlled by the monopolistic Communist party government. With the collapse of the Communist regime in Czechoslovakia, the newly established Museum of the Workers’ Movement required the manuscript. Finally, in 2014, they donated it, together with their other collections, to the National Museum. This change enabled an extensive conservation and restoration collaborative research carried out by the National Museum and the University of Chemistry and Technology (VŠCHT). The manuscript of Notes has been stored in so-called glass sandwiches since the early 1950s. They consisted of 167 slips of paper – on which the individual passages of Notes used to be smuggled out of Pankrác prison – inserted in plastic films and put (usually three and three on every side) between two durable glass plates. Unfortunately, this seemingly safe and precise storage method did not prevent gradual degradation of selected snippets. Therefore, it was decided to launch a physical condition investigation during which experts revealed significant differences from the declared conservation method, including the absence of alleged protection against ultraviolet radiation by supposedly ultraviolet-resistant glass. Further research and verification of the causes of paper degradation will determine the final nature of the restoration procedure and the subsequent method of storage of Fučík’s manuscript.","PeriodicalId":440569,"journal":{"name":"Časopis Národního muzea. Řada historická","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Časopis Národního muzea. Řada historická","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37520/cnm.2020.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

朱利叶斯Fučík最重要的文学作品,《绞刑架笔记》,是捷克翻译最多的文本之一,也是最具争议的文本之一。无论是由于其作者、共产主义记者、抵抗运动战士尤利乌斯Fučík(1903-1943)非凡的人生经历和奢华的个性,还是关于其内容和创作环境的长期争论。然而,文本的真实性最终在20世纪90年代初被专家法医报告所淹没。然而,与此同时,对Fučík原文审查的怀疑得到了证实。虽然这本书多次出版,但手稿作为Fučík的遗孀Gusta Fučíková(1903-1987)的财产一直无法向公众开放。直到1987年她去世后,Fučík的原始签名才成为克莱门特·戈特瓦尔德博物馆(Klement Gottwald Museum)收藏的一部分,这是一家由垄断的共产党政府控制的党博物馆。随着捷克斯洛伐克共产党政权的垮台,新成立的工人运动博物馆需要这份手稿。最后,在2014年,他们把它和其他藏品一起捐赠给了国家博物馆。这一变化使得国家博物馆和化学技术大学(VŠCHT)开展了广泛的保护和修复合作研究。自20世纪50年代初以来,《笔记》的手稿一直保存在所谓的玻璃三明治中。它们是由167张纸条组成的——纸条上的每一段笔记都是从Pankrác监狱走私出来的——插入塑料薄膜中,然后(通常是每一面三张)夹在两块耐用的玻璃板之间。不幸的是,这种看似安全和精确的储存方法并没有阻止所选片段的逐渐降解。因此,决定进行实物调查。在调查过程中,专家们发现了与公布的保存方法有很大差异的地方,包括没有所谓的防紫外线玻璃来保护紫外线。对纸张退化原因的进一步研究和验证将决定修复程序的最终性质以及Fučík手稿的后续存储方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
„Radila jsem se již několikrát s archiváři...“ – několik poznámek k problematice fyzického stavu a konzervace rukopisu Julia Fučíka Reportáž, psaná na oprátce
Julius Fučík’s most important literary work, Notes from the Gallows, is one of the most translated Czech texts, as well as one of the most controversial. Whether it was caused by the extraordinary life story and extravagant personality of its author, communist journalist and resistance fighter Julius Fučík (1903–1943), or the long-lasting dispute concerning both its contents and circumstances of its origin. Yet, the authenticity of the text was finally subsustimated by the expert forensic report in the early 1990s. At the same time, however, the suspicion of the censorship of Fučík’s original text was confirmed. Even though the book was repeatedly published, its manuscript remained inaccessible to the public as the property of Fučík’s widow Gusta Fučíková (1903–1987). It was only after her death in 1987 when the original Fučík’s autograph became a part of the collection of the Klement Gottwald Museum, a party museum controlled by the monopolistic Communist party government. With the collapse of the Communist regime in Czechoslovakia, the newly established Museum of the Workers’ Movement required the manuscript. Finally, in 2014, they donated it, together with their other collections, to the National Museum. This change enabled an extensive conservation and restoration collaborative research carried out by the National Museum and the University of Chemistry and Technology (VŠCHT). The manuscript of Notes has been stored in so-called glass sandwiches since the early 1950s. They consisted of 167 slips of paper – on which the individual passages of Notes used to be smuggled out of Pankrác prison – inserted in plastic films and put (usually three and three on every side) between two durable glass plates. Unfortunately, this seemingly safe and precise storage method did not prevent gradual degradation of selected snippets. Therefore, it was decided to launch a physical condition investigation during which experts revealed significant differences from the declared conservation method, including the absence of alleged protection against ultraviolet radiation by supposedly ultraviolet-resistant glass. Further research and verification of the causes of paper degradation will determine the final nature of the restoration procedure and the subsequent method of storage of Fučík’s manuscript.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信