并发和分布式系统的运行时断言检查和定理证明

Crystal Chang Din, Olaf Owe, Richard Bubel
{"title":"并发和分布式系统的运行时断言检查和定理证明","authors":"Crystal Chang Din, Olaf Owe, Richard Bubel","doi":"10.5220/0004877804800487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the usage of a history-based specification approach for concurrent and distributed systems. In particular, we compare two approaches on checking that those systems behave according to their specification. Concretely, we apply runtime assertion checking and static deductive verification on two small case studies to detect specification violations, respectively to ensure that the system follows its specifications. We evaluate and compare both approaches with respect to their scope and ease of application. We give recommendations on which approach is suitable for which purpose as well as the implied costs and benefits of each approach.","PeriodicalId":336046,"journal":{"name":"2014 2nd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Runtime assertion checking and theorem proving for concurrent and distributed systems\",\"authors\":\"Crystal Chang Din, Olaf Owe, Richard Bubel\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0004877804800487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the usage of a history-based specification approach for concurrent and distributed systems. In particular, we compare two approaches on checking that those systems behave according to their specification. Concretely, we apply runtime assertion checking and static deductive verification on two small case studies to detect specification violations, respectively to ensure that the system follows its specifications. We evaluate and compare both approaches with respect to their scope and ease of application. We give recommendations on which approach is suitable for which purpose as well as the implied costs and benefits of each approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0004877804800487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 2nd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0004877804800487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

我们研究了并发和分布式系统中基于历史的规范方法的使用。特别地,我们比较了检查这些系统是否符合其规范的两种方法。具体地说,我们在两个小的案例研究上应用运行时断言检查和静态演绎验证,分别检测规范违反,以确保系统遵循其规范。我们评估和比较两种方法的范围和应用的容易程度。我们就哪种方法适合哪种目的以及每种方法的隐含成本和收益提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Runtime assertion checking and theorem proving for concurrent and distributed systems
We investigate the usage of a history-based specification approach for concurrent and distributed systems. In particular, we compare two approaches on checking that those systems behave according to their specification. Concretely, we apply runtime assertion checking and static deductive verification on two small case studies to detect specification violations, respectively to ensure that the system follows its specifications. We evaluate and compare both approaches with respect to their scope and ease of application. We give recommendations on which approach is suitable for which purpose as well as the implied costs and benefits of each approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信