公众舆论对环境许可的印象和公众参与有关公共管理做法的设计和实施的决定

Helena de Figueiredo Hammes, T. Siqueira, Daiane da Silva Marques, Martha Ferrugem Kaiser, Diovana da Silva Guterres
{"title":"公众舆论对环境许可的印象和公众参与有关公共管理做法的设计和实施的决定","authors":"Helena de Figueiredo Hammes, T. Siqueira, Daiane da Silva Marques, Martha Ferrugem Kaiser, Diovana da Silva Guterres","doi":"10.5327/z2176-94781460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The involvement of society in environmental management, when allowed, encourages the formulation, implementation, and monitoring of environmental policies. The public hearings that make up the environmental licensing process and that represent a space for direct popular participation have proven to be inefficient. This work aims to capture the impressions of public opinion regarding popular participation in decision-making, both about public practices of environmental management and about environmental licensing. The data were collected in the second half of 2020 through a questionnaire prepared through Google Forms and disseminated on social networks according to a virtual sampling technique called “snowball.” The sample was composed of 59 individuals, mostly from Rio Grande do Sul (88%). The respondents feel excluded from the licensing process and the actions to protect the environment where they live, showing interest in being more participatory, both by adding information about the region where they live and by assisting in enforcement within their neighborhoods. Most of the public consulted considers that the dissemination of information about public actions and the need to acquire knowledge about the functionalities of environmental licensing are essential to ensure a more effective participation of the population in the formulation of environmental protection policies. It is concluded that direct participative democracy is still deficient due to the low adhesion of the population, whose engagement depends on factors related to environmental education, the availability of information, and the simplification of forms of democratic participation that are closer to the citizen.","PeriodicalId":352759,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impressions of public opinion on environmental licensing and popular participation in decisions regarding the design and implementation of public management practices\",\"authors\":\"Helena de Figueiredo Hammes, T. Siqueira, Daiane da Silva Marques, Martha Ferrugem Kaiser, Diovana da Silva Guterres\",\"doi\":\"10.5327/z2176-94781460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The involvement of society in environmental management, when allowed, encourages the formulation, implementation, and monitoring of environmental policies. The public hearings that make up the environmental licensing process and that represent a space for direct popular participation have proven to be inefficient. This work aims to capture the impressions of public opinion regarding popular participation in decision-making, both about public practices of environmental management and about environmental licensing. The data were collected in the second half of 2020 through a questionnaire prepared through Google Forms and disseminated on social networks according to a virtual sampling technique called “snowball.” The sample was composed of 59 individuals, mostly from Rio Grande do Sul (88%). The respondents feel excluded from the licensing process and the actions to protect the environment where they live, showing interest in being more participatory, both by adding information about the region where they live and by assisting in enforcement within their neighborhoods. Most of the public consulted considers that the dissemination of information about public actions and the need to acquire knowledge about the functionalities of environmental licensing are essential to ensure a more effective participation of the population in the formulation of environmental protection policies. It is concluded that direct participative democracy is still deficient due to the low adhesion of the population, whose engagement depends on factors related to environmental education, the availability of information, and the simplification of forms of democratic participation that are closer to the citizen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5327/z2176-94781460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/z2176-94781460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在允许的情况下,社会参与环境管理可以鼓励环境政策的制定、实施和监测。构成环境许可程序的公开听证会,代表着民众直接参与的空间,已被证明效率低下。这项工作的目的是捕捉公众舆论对公众参与决策的印象,包括环境管理的公共实践和环境许可。这些数据是在2020年下半年通过谷歌表格准备的问卷收集的,并根据被称为“雪球”的虚拟抽样技术在社交网络上传播。样本由59人组成,大部分来自南里奥格兰德州(88%)。受访者感到被排除在许可程序和保护他们居住的环境的行动之外,他们表示有兴趣通过增加有关他们居住地区的信息和协助社区内的执法来更多地参与。大多数公众谘询认为,要确保市民更有效地参与制订环境保护政策,必须传播有关公众行动的资料,并了解环境许可证的功能。结论是,直接参与式民主仍然存在缺陷,因为人口的粘性较低,他们的参与取决于与环境教育、信息的可获得性以及更接近公民的民主参与形式的简化有关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impressions of public opinion on environmental licensing and popular participation in decisions regarding the design and implementation of public management practices
The involvement of society in environmental management, when allowed, encourages the formulation, implementation, and monitoring of environmental policies. The public hearings that make up the environmental licensing process and that represent a space for direct popular participation have proven to be inefficient. This work aims to capture the impressions of public opinion regarding popular participation in decision-making, both about public practices of environmental management and about environmental licensing. The data were collected in the second half of 2020 through a questionnaire prepared through Google Forms and disseminated on social networks according to a virtual sampling technique called “snowball.” The sample was composed of 59 individuals, mostly from Rio Grande do Sul (88%). The respondents feel excluded from the licensing process and the actions to protect the environment where they live, showing interest in being more participatory, both by adding information about the region where they live and by assisting in enforcement within their neighborhoods. Most of the public consulted considers that the dissemination of information about public actions and the need to acquire knowledge about the functionalities of environmental licensing are essential to ensure a more effective participation of the population in the formulation of environmental protection policies. It is concluded that direct participative democracy is still deficient due to the low adhesion of the population, whose engagement depends on factors related to environmental education, the availability of information, and the simplification of forms of democratic participation that are closer to the citizen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信