评估公众演讲

Noel R. Jackson, A. Ward
{"title":"评估公众演讲","authors":"Noel R. Jackson, A. Ward","doi":"10.1109/ITHET.2014.7155700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing public speaking is an increasingly normal part of a University or Higher Education establishment's role in the attempt to embed useful transferable skills in students ready for their entry into the workplace. This activity can take an increasing amount of time out of teaching given that students require a reasonable opportunity to show what they are capable of. Approaches to assessment of ability during a presentation vary from hand written notes on a paper based guide through tick sheets to electronically based versions and spreadsheets. Processes may vary between institutions thus the issue of whether it should be purely academics making the assessment, purely students assessing their peers or a mixture of both is probably decided within the associated assessment regulations. There is also of course the need to consider weightings, marks and categories that could vary with the subject matter all of which can be very confusing and more subjective to the marker than allowing for objectivity in the marking process. The purpose of this study is to trial the production and use of a `common' rubric to assess individual student's presentations during a one year taught masters (MSc) in Engineering Management at the University of York. One of the key research outputs will be to indicate whether such an approach, and this specific rubric in particular, is effective in reducing assessment workload for staff and thus improving the student experience in terms of timeliness of feedback. This paper will describe the production and trialing of the rubric before discussing the findings and their implications.","PeriodicalId":432693,"journal":{"name":"2014 Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing public speaking\",\"authors\":\"Noel R. Jackson, A. Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITHET.2014.7155700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessing public speaking is an increasingly normal part of a University or Higher Education establishment's role in the attempt to embed useful transferable skills in students ready for their entry into the workplace. This activity can take an increasing amount of time out of teaching given that students require a reasonable opportunity to show what they are capable of. Approaches to assessment of ability during a presentation vary from hand written notes on a paper based guide through tick sheets to electronically based versions and spreadsheets. Processes may vary between institutions thus the issue of whether it should be purely academics making the assessment, purely students assessing their peers or a mixture of both is probably decided within the associated assessment regulations. There is also of course the need to consider weightings, marks and categories that could vary with the subject matter all of which can be very confusing and more subjective to the marker than allowing for objectivity in the marking process. The purpose of this study is to trial the production and use of a `common' rubric to assess individual student's presentations during a one year taught masters (MSc) in Engineering Management at the University of York. One of the key research outputs will be to indicate whether such an approach, and this specific rubric in particular, is effective in reducing assessment workload for staff and thus improving the student experience in terms of timeliness of feedback. This paper will describe the production and trialing of the rubric before discussing the findings and their implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2014.7155700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2014.7155700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在大学或高等教育机构试图将有用的可转移技能植入学生准备进入职场的过程中,评估公众演讲是一个越来越正常的部分。鉴于学生需要合理的机会来展示他们的能力,这种活动可能会占用越来越多的教学时间。在演示过程中评估能力的方法多种多样,从在纸质指南上手写的笔记到打勾表,再到电子版本和电子表格。各院校之间的评估过程可能有所不同,因此,究竟应该由纯粹的学者进行评估,还是纯粹的学生评估他们的同龄人,或者两者兼而有之,这一问题可能在相关的评估规定中决定。当然,还需要考虑权重、分数和类别,这些可能会随着主题的不同而变化,所有这些都可能让阅卷人非常困惑,而且对阅卷人来说,比客观的阅卷过程更主观。本研究的目的是尝试制作和使用一个“通用”的标准来评估约克大学一年制工程管理硕士(MSc)学生的演讲。关键的研究成果之一将是指出这种方法,特别是这个具体的题目,是否能有效地减少工作人员的评价工作量,从而在反馈的及时性方面改善学生的经验。本文将在讨论研究结果及其影响之前描述该指标的生产和试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing public speaking
Assessing public speaking is an increasingly normal part of a University or Higher Education establishment's role in the attempt to embed useful transferable skills in students ready for their entry into the workplace. This activity can take an increasing amount of time out of teaching given that students require a reasonable opportunity to show what they are capable of. Approaches to assessment of ability during a presentation vary from hand written notes on a paper based guide through tick sheets to electronically based versions and spreadsheets. Processes may vary between institutions thus the issue of whether it should be purely academics making the assessment, purely students assessing their peers or a mixture of both is probably decided within the associated assessment regulations. There is also of course the need to consider weightings, marks and categories that could vary with the subject matter all of which can be very confusing and more subjective to the marker than allowing for objectivity in the marking process. The purpose of this study is to trial the production and use of a `common' rubric to assess individual student's presentations during a one year taught masters (MSc) in Engineering Management at the University of York. One of the key research outputs will be to indicate whether such an approach, and this specific rubric in particular, is effective in reducing assessment workload for staff and thus improving the student experience in terms of timeliness of feedback. This paper will describe the production and trialing of the rubric before discussing the findings and their implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信