2018年库尔德斯坦地区议会选举:代表权不公平及其解决办法

جلال مصطفی
{"title":"2018年库尔德斯坦地区议会选举:代表权不公平及其解决办法","authors":"جلال مصطفی","doi":"10.31271/jopss.10036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elections for the fifth round of Kurdistan Parliament were held in 2018. Relying on information (election results and MPs’ backgrounds) published by the Independent High Elections and Referendum Commission (IHERC) in the Kurdistan Region, electoral results have created inequality among Kurdistan Region’s governorates in terms of obtaining parliamentary seats when the number of valid voters is considered. The question to be tackled in this article is how to minimize this injustice to its minimum. In its search for an answer to this question, this article needs to excavate some issues. In the beginning, the researcher will briefly present the current electoral system in force in the Kurdistan Region. Then, and by relying on the information published by the IHERC in the Kurdistan Region, the researcher tries to explore what led to the presence of the injustice in the governorates’ share of parliamentary seats. Hence, as part of a solution to this problem, an electoral system (the non-proportional system, majority or plurality) is presented that can reduce the injustice to a large extent. Despite this, each electoral system, although appropriate in a context, may have its own shortcomings and thus a solution is needed. Thus, the last part of the research is devoted to the problems caused by the adoption of a non-proportional electoral system and the ways they can be solved.","PeriodicalId":201792,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Political and Security Studies","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Parliamentary Elections of 2018 in Kurdistan Region: unfairness in representation and its solution\",\"authors\":\"جلال مصطفی\",\"doi\":\"10.31271/jopss.10036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Elections for the fifth round of Kurdistan Parliament were held in 2018. Relying on information (election results and MPs’ backgrounds) published by the Independent High Elections and Referendum Commission (IHERC) in the Kurdistan Region, electoral results have created inequality among Kurdistan Region’s governorates in terms of obtaining parliamentary seats when the number of valid voters is considered. The question to be tackled in this article is how to minimize this injustice to its minimum. In its search for an answer to this question, this article needs to excavate some issues. In the beginning, the researcher will briefly present the current electoral system in force in the Kurdistan Region. Then, and by relying on the information published by the IHERC in the Kurdistan Region, the researcher tries to explore what led to the presence of the injustice in the governorates’ share of parliamentary seats. Hence, as part of a solution to this problem, an electoral system (the non-proportional system, majority or plurality) is presented that can reduce the injustice to a large extent. Despite this, each electoral system, although appropriate in a context, may have its own shortcomings and thus a solution is needed. Thus, the last part of the research is devoted to the problems caused by the adoption of a non-proportional electoral system and the ways they can be solved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Political and Security Studies\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Political and Security Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31271/jopss.10036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Political and Security Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31271/jopss.10036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018年举行了第五轮库尔德斯坦议会选举。根据库尔德斯坦地区独立高级选举和公民投票委员会(IHERC)公布的信息(选举结果和议员背景),考虑到有效选民的数量,选举结果造成了库尔德斯坦地区各省在获得议会席位方面的不平等。本文要解决的问题是如何把这种不公正减少到最低限度。在寻找这个问题的答案的过程中,本文需要挖掘一些问题。首先,研究人员将简要介绍库尔德斯坦地区现行的选举制度。然后,依靠IHERC在库尔德斯坦地区发布的信息,研究人员试图探索导致各省议会席位份额不公正的原因。因此,作为解决这一问题的一部分,提出了一种可以在很大程度上减少不公正现象的选举制度(非比例制度,多数或多数)。尽管如此,每一种选举制度虽然在某种情况下是适当的,但可能有其自身的缺点,因此需要一个解决办法。因此,研究的最后一部分专门讨论采用非比例选举制度所造成的问题及其解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Parliamentary Elections of 2018 in Kurdistan Region: unfairness in representation and its solution
Elections for the fifth round of Kurdistan Parliament were held in 2018. Relying on information (election results and MPs’ backgrounds) published by the Independent High Elections and Referendum Commission (IHERC) in the Kurdistan Region, electoral results have created inequality among Kurdistan Region’s governorates in terms of obtaining parliamentary seats when the number of valid voters is considered. The question to be tackled in this article is how to minimize this injustice to its minimum. In its search for an answer to this question, this article needs to excavate some issues. In the beginning, the researcher will briefly present the current electoral system in force in the Kurdistan Region. Then, and by relying on the information published by the IHERC in the Kurdistan Region, the researcher tries to explore what led to the presence of the injustice in the governorates’ share of parliamentary seats. Hence, as part of a solution to this problem, an electoral system (the non-proportional system, majority or plurality) is presented that can reduce the injustice to a large extent. Despite this, each electoral system, although appropriate in a context, may have its own shortcomings and thus a solution is needed. Thus, the last part of the research is devoted to the problems caused by the adoption of a non-proportional electoral system and the ways they can be solved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信