互连结构的功率分析

Yan Zhang, W. Ye, R. Owens, M. J. Irwin
{"title":"互连结构的功率分析","authors":"Yan Zhang, W. Ye, R. Owens, M. J. Irwin","doi":"10.1109/ASIC.1997.616972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interconnect structures play a more and more important role in low power computer design. Yet few investigations have been done in power analysis of interconnect structures. In this paper five designs of interconnect structures are implemented and a power analysis of interconnect structures that vary at the architecture level and gate level for different numbers of input ports is presented. The results based on these designs show that MUXes implemented with n-type pass transistors consume the least total power and set up power (power consumption in setting up the transmitting path). Crossbars consume the least transfer power (power consumption in transferring data). MUXes implemented with SPSD (Sympathetic Precharge Static Domino) gates have relatively lower delay especially for high fan-in interconnect structures. MUXes implemented with pass transistors have the lowest power-delay product for input ports numbers of 4, 8 and 16 while MUXes implemented with SPSD gates have the lowest power-delay product for interconnect structures which have 32 input ports.","PeriodicalId":300310,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Tenth Annual IEEE International ASIC Conference and Exhibit (Cat. No.97TH8334)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The power analysis of interconnect structures\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhang, W. Ye, R. Owens, M. J. Irwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASIC.1997.616972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interconnect structures play a more and more important role in low power computer design. Yet few investigations have been done in power analysis of interconnect structures. In this paper five designs of interconnect structures are implemented and a power analysis of interconnect structures that vary at the architecture level and gate level for different numbers of input ports is presented. The results based on these designs show that MUXes implemented with n-type pass transistors consume the least total power and set up power (power consumption in setting up the transmitting path). Crossbars consume the least transfer power (power consumption in transferring data). MUXes implemented with SPSD (Sympathetic Precharge Static Domino) gates have relatively lower delay especially for high fan-in interconnect structures. MUXes implemented with pass transistors have the lowest power-delay product for input ports numbers of 4, 8 and 16 while MUXes implemented with SPSD gates have the lowest power-delay product for interconnect structures which have 32 input ports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Tenth Annual IEEE International ASIC Conference and Exhibit (Cat. No.97TH8334)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Tenth Annual IEEE International ASIC Conference and Exhibit (Cat. No.97TH8334)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASIC.1997.616972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Tenth Annual IEEE International ASIC Conference and Exhibit (Cat. No.97TH8334)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASIC.1997.616972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

互连结构在低功耗计算机设计中起着越来越重要的作用。然而,对互连结构的功率分析研究却很少。本文实现了五种互连结构的设计,并对不同输入端口数下互连结构在体系结构级和栅极级的功耗进行了分析。基于这些设计的结果表明,使用n型通路晶体管实现的mux消耗的总功率和设置功率(设置发射路径的功耗)最小。横梁的传输功率最小(传输数据的功耗)。用SPSD(交感预充静态多米诺)门实现的mux具有相对较低的延迟,特别是对于高扇入互连结构。使用通路晶体管实现的mux对于输入端口编号为4、8和16的mux具有最低的功率延迟积,而使用SPSD门实现的mux对于具有32个输入端口的互连结构具有最低的功率延迟积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The power analysis of interconnect structures
Interconnect structures play a more and more important role in low power computer design. Yet few investigations have been done in power analysis of interconnect structures. In this paper five designs of interconnect structures are implemented and a power analysis of interconnect structures that vary at the architecture level and gate level for different numbers of input ports is presented. The results based on these designs show that MUXes implemented with n-type pass transistors consume the least total power and set up power (power consumption in setting up the transmitting path). Crossbars consume the least transfer power (power consumption in transferring data). MUXes implemented with SPSD (Sympathetic Precharge Static Domino) gates have relatively lower delay especially for high fan-in interconnect structures. MUXes implemented with pass transistors have the lowest power-delay product for input ports numbers of 4, 8 and 16 while MUXes implemented with SPSD gates have the lowest power-delay product for interconnect structures which have 32 input ports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信