有限流的加权功利主义

ERN: Equity Pub Date : 2018-09-26 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3180977
Tapan Mitra, Kemal Ozbek
{"title":"有限流的加权功利主义","authors":"Tapan Mitra, Kemal Ozbek","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3180977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide an axiomatic analysis of weighted utilitarianism from which many available characterizations follow. We show that a social preference order over finite utility streams has a weak weighted utilitarian representation if it satisfies the axioms of Weak Pareto, Minimal Individual Symmetry, and Shift Invariance. This result can be strengthened to yield a strong (that is, complete) weighted utilitarian representation if and only if it satisfies the above three basic axioms, and an axiom on the “continuity of indifference”. Unlike many available characterizations, our result directly constructs the social welfare weights (used in the above weighted utilitarian representation results) from the preference order. Moreover, the welfare weights are uniquely identified allowing for comparative statics analysis. We show with an example that the three basic axioms do not guarantee a representation (and therefore a weighted utilitarian representation) of the preference order.","PeriodicalId":282303,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Equity","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weighted Utilitarianism over Finite Streams\",\"authors\":\"Tapan Mitra, Kemal Ozbek\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3180977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We provide an axiomatic analysis of weighted utilitarianism from which many available characterizations follow. We show that a social preference order over finite utility streams has a weak weighted utilitarian representation if it satisfies the axioms of Weak Pareto, Minimal Individual Symmetry, and Shift Invariance. This result can be strengthened to yield a strong (that is, complete) weighted utilitarian representation if and only if it satisfies the above three basic axioms, and an axiom on the “continuity of indifference”. Unlike many available characterizations, our result directly constructs the social welfare weights (used in the above weighted utilitarian representation results) from the preference order. Moreover, the welfare weights are uniquely identified allowing for comparative statics analysis. We show with an example that the three basic axioms do not guarantee a representation (and therefore a weighted utilitarian representation) of the preference order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Equity\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Equity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3180977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3180977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提供了加权功利主义的公理化分析,从许多可用的特征遵循。我们证明了有限效用流上的社会偏好顺序,如果满足弱帕累托公理、最小个体对称公理和移位不变性公理,则具有弱加权效用表示。当且仅当满足上述三个基本公理和关于“无差异连续性”的公理时,这个结果可以得到一个强(即,完全)加权功利表示。与许多可用的特征不同,我们的结果直接从偏好顺序构建社会福利权重(用于上述加权功利主义表示结果)。此外,福利权重是唯一确定允许比较静态分析。我们用一个例子表明,这三个基本公理并不能保证偏好顺序的表示(因此是加权功利表示)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weighted Utilitarianism over Finite Streams
We provide an axiomatic analysis of weighted utilitarianism from which many available characterizations follow. We show that a social preference order over finite utility streams has a weak weighted utilitarian representation if it satisfies the axioms of Weak Pareto, Minimal Individual Symmetry, and Shift Invariance. This result can be strengthened to yield a strong (that is, complete) weighted utilitarian representation if and only if it satisfies the above three basic axioms, and an axiom on the “continuity of indifference”. Unlike many available characterizations, our result directly constructs the social welfare weights (used in the above weighted utilitarian representation results) from the preference order. Moreover, the welfare weights are uniquely identified allowing for comparative statics analysis. We show with an example that the three basic axioms do not guarantee a representation (and therefore a weighted utilitarian representation) of the preference order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信