{"title":"第11/2020号关于印尼乡村企业创造就业机会的法律含义","authors":"Detania Sukarja, M. Siregar, T. Lubis","doi":"10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The enactment of Law No.11/2020 concerning Job Creation (“Job Creation Law”) is one of the most controversial issues in Indonesia towards the end of 2020. Village-owned enterprise (“BUM Desa”) is one of the aspects that fall within the scope of this new law. This law changes the legal definition of BUM Desa. The change is not only important because it confirms the status of BUM Desa as a legal entity, but it also removes the concept of ownership criteria provisions as stipulated in the 2014 Village Law. The new definition also removes the concept of ‘separated wealth’ (kekayaan yang dipisahkan), which is the basic characteristic of public companies like BUMN and BUMD, as well as BUM Desa before the enactment of the Job Creation Law. Based on normative legal research, this paper seeks to identify the legal implication of issuance of the Job Creation Law on the legal aspects of BUM Desa. It aims to clarify to what extent the law addresses the various legal problems of BUM Desa and provides legal certainty for related stakeholders. The paper concludes that the Job Creation Law contains a number of provisions that have implications for the legal aspects of BUM Desa, among which: (1) the clarity and confirmation of the status of BUM Desa legal entities as stated in the new operational definition of BUM Desa; (2) The removal of ownership criteria from the operational definition of BUM Desa may open the possibility for BUM Desa to be controlled by private capital and dissolves the concept of village community ownership of BUM Desa; (3)The provisions regarding BUM Desa in the Job Creation Law has not clarified the misconception of BUM Desa as stipulated in the Village Law and the derivative regulations, but instead contains conflicting provisions that may spark further debate and maintain legal uncertainty in BUM Desa management and development. The implementing regulations relating to BUM Desa under the Job Creation Law to await finalization of the draft Law on BUM Desa to ensure consistency.","PeriodicalId":406252,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Implication of Law No.11/2020 Concerning Job Creation on Village-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Detania Sukarja, M. Siregar, T. Lubis\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The enactment of Law No.11/2020 concerning Job Creation (“Job Creation Law”) is one of the most controversial issues in Indonesia towards the end of 2020. Village-owned enterprise (“BUM Desa”) is one of the aspects that fall within the scope of this new law. This law changes the legal definition of BUM Desa. The change is not only important because it confirms the status of BUM Desa as a legal entity, but it also removes the concept of ownership criteria provisions as stipulated in the 2014 Village Law. The new definition also removes the concept of ‘separated wealth’ (kekayaan yang dipisahkan), which is the basic characteristic of public companies like BUMN and BUMD, as well as BUM Desa before the enactment of the Job Creation Law. Based on normative legal research, this paper seeks to identify the legal implication of issuance of the Job Creation Law on the legal aspects of BUM Desa. It aims to clarify to what extent the law addresses the various legal problems of BUM Desa and provides legal certainty for related stakeholders. The paper concludes that the Job Creation Law contains a number of provisions that have implications for the legal aspects of BUM Desa, among which: (1) the clarity and confirmation of the status of BUM Desa legal entities as stated in the new operational definition of BUM Desa; (2) The removal of ownership criteria from the operational definition of BUM Desa may open the possibility for BUM Desa to be controlled by private capital and dissolves the concept of village community ownership of BUM Desa; (3)The provisions regarding BUM Desa in the Job Creation Law has not clarified the misconception of BUM Desa as stipulated in the Village Law and the derivative regulations, but instead contains conflicting provisions that may spark further debate and maintain legal uncertainty in BUM Desa management and development. The implementing regulations relating to BUM Desa under the Job Creation Law to await finalization of the draft Law on BUM Desa to ensure consistency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
. 关于创造就业的第11/2020号法律(“创造就业法”)的颁布是2020年底印度尼西亚最具争议的问题之一。村所有制企业(" BUM Desa ")是这项新法律范围内的一个方面。这一法律改变了BUM Desa的法律定义。这一变化之所以重要,不仅因为它确认了BUM Desa作为法律实体的地位,而且还取消了2014年《村法》中规定的所有权标准条款的概念。在《创造工作岗位法》出台之前,BUMN、BUMD等上市企业和bumdesa的基本特征“财产分离”概念也被删除。本文在规范法律研究的基础上,试图确定《创造就业法》的颁布对BUM Desa法律方面的法律含义。它旨在澄清法律在多大程度上解决了BUM Desa的各种法律问题,并为相关利益相关者提供法律确定性。本文的结论是,《创造就业法》包含了一些对就业岗位就业的法律方面有影响的条款,其中包括:(1)在就业岗位就业的新业务定义中,明确和确认了就业岗位就业的法律实体地位;(2)从民房经营定义中去除所有权标准可能会为民房被私人资本控制提供可能性,消解了民房村社区所有权的概念;(3)《创造就业法》中关于农村低保的规定并没有澄清《村法》及其衍生法规中对农村低保的误解,反而包含了相互矛盾的规定,可能引发进一步的争论,使农村低保的管理和发展保持法律上的不确定性。根据《创造就业法》,有关失业救济金的实施条例正在等待失业救济金法草案的最后定稿,以确保一致性。
Legal Implication of Law No.11/2020 Concerning Job Creation on Village-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia
. The enactment of Law No.11/2020 concerning Job Creation (“Job Creation Law”) is one of the most controversial issues in Indonesia towards the end of 2020. Village-owned enterprise (“BUM Desa”) is one of the aspects that fall within the scope of this new law. This law changes the legal definition of BUM Desa. The change is not only important because it confirms the status of BUM Desa as a legal entity, but it also removes the concept of ownership criteria provisions as stipulated in the 2014 Village Law. The new definition also removes the concept of ‘separated wealth’ (kekayaan yang dipisahkan), which is the basic characteristic of public companies like BUMN and BUMD, as well as BUM Desa before the enactment of the Job Creation Law. Based on normative legal research, this paper seeks to identify the legal implication of issuance of the Job Creation Law on the legal aspects of BUM Desa. It aims to clarify to what extent the law addresses the various legal problems of BUM Desa and provides legal certainty for related stakeholders. The paper concludes that the Job Creation Law contains a number of provisions that have implications for the legal aspects of BUM Desa, among which: (1) the clarity and confirmation of the status of BUM Desa legal entities as stated in the new operational definition of BUM Desa; (2) The removal of ownership criteria from the operational definition of BUM Desa may open the possibility for BUM Desa to be controlled by private capital and dissolves the concept of village community ownership of BUM Desa; (3)The provisions regarding BUM Desa in the Job Creation Law has not clarified the misconception of BUM Desa as stipulated in the Village Law and the derivative regulations, but instead contains conflicting provisions that may spark further debate and maintain legal uncertainty in BUM Desa management and development. The implementing regulations relating to BUM Desa under the Job Creation Law to await finalization of the draft Law on BUM Desa to ensure consistency.