胸片拒收分析在诊断放射学中的评价

OmarSalahAlahmadi, Ahmed Alrehaili, MoawiaBushraGameraddin
{"title":"胸片拒收分析在诊断放射学中的评价","authors":"OmarSalahAlahmadi, Ahmed Alrehaili, MoawiaBushraGameraddin","doi":"10.5455/AJDI.20180830110208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Reject analysis is an important quality indicator and is required for reducing radiation exposure to the patient and increased cost-effectiveness. \nAim: The study aims to analyze reject rates and causes in direct chest radiographs to assess the radiographic quality. \nMaterials and Methods: A total of 150 chest radiographs (CXR) had been retrospectively analyzed at King Fahad Hospital from January to March 2016. \nResults: The rejection rate was 14.7%. Positioning errors and artifacts were the most significant factors for reject analysis in chest radiography. Positioning errors are the most common cause of rejection (16%), and artifacts are the second reason (11.33%). In consequence to positioning error, the scapular shadow was partially located at the lung field in 38% of the images. \nConclusion: chest radiographs are the most common x-ray examination requested. Positioning errors are still challenging, which affect the quality of the image. An overall rejection rate of 14.7% indicates a need for continuous practice in the Radiology department to improve the performance.","PeriodicalId":178697,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Reject Analysis of Chest Radiographs in Diagnostic Radiology\",\"authors\":\"OmarSalahAlahmadi, Ahmed Alrehaili, MoawiaBushraGameraddin\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/AJDI.20180830110208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Reject analysis is an important quality indicator and is required for reducing radiation exposure to the patient and increased cost-effectiveness. \\nAim: The study aims to analyze reject rates and causes in direct chest radiographs to assess the radiographic quality. \\nMaterials and Methods: A total of 150 chest radiographs (CXR) had been retrospectively analyzed at King Fahad Hospital from January to March 2016. \\nResults: The rejection rate was 14.7%. Positioning errors and artifacts were the most significant factors for reject analysis in chest radiography. Positioning errors are the most common cause of rejection (16%), and artifacts are the second reason (11.33%). In consequence to positioning error, the scapular shadow was partially located at the lung field in 38% of the images. \\nConclusion: chest radiographs are the most common x-ray examination requested. Positioning errors are still challenging, which affect the quality of the image. An overall rejection rate of 14.7% indicates a need for continuous practice in the Radiology department to improve the performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/AJDI.20180830110208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/AJDI.20180830110208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

导言:拒收分析是一项重要的质量指标,是减少患者辐射暴露和提高成本效益所必需的。目的:分析胸部x线片不良率及原因,评价胸部x线片质量。材料与方法:回顾性分析法赫德国王医院2016年1 - 3月收治的150张胸片(CXR)。结果:排异率为14.7%。定位错误和伪影是胸片拒绝分析的最重要因素。定位错误是最常见的拒收原因(16%),其次是人为因素(11.33%)。由于定位误差,38%的图像肩胛骨阴影部分位于肺野。结论:胸片是最常见的x线检查要求。定位误差仍然具有挑战性,影响图像质量。总体拒绝率为14.7%,表明放射科需要持续的实践来提高表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Reject Analysis of Chest Radiographs in Diagnostic Radiology
Introduction: Reject analysis is an important quality indicator and is required for reducing radiation exposure to the patient and increased cost-effectiveness. Aim: The study aims to analyze reject rates and causes in direct chest radiographs to assess the radiographic quality. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 chest radiographs (CXR) had been retrospectively analyzed at King Fahad Hospital from January to March 2016. Results: The rejection rate was 14.7%. Positioning errors and artifacts were the most significant factors for reject analysis in chest radiography. Positioning errors are the most common cause of rejection (16%), and artifacts are the second reason (11.33%). In consequence to positioning error, the scapular shadow was partially located at the lung field in 38% of the images. Conclusion: chest radiographs are the most common x-ray examination requested. Positioning errors are still challenging, which affect the quality of the image. An overall rejection rate of 14.7% indicates a need for continuous practice in the Radiology department to improve the performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信