认知策略:系统设计的研究视角

P. Kirs, L. Volonino
{"title":"认知策略:系统设计的研究视角","authors":"P. Kirs, L. Volonino","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this empirical study was to examine one of the aspects of cognitive processes, namely, cognitive strategies, for multiple-criteria decisions. The results indicate that there are differences in performance, efficiency, and confidence due to the moderating effects of cognitive strategy, particularly when that strategy is interfered with. Attempts to accommodate decision-makers' cognitive styles may have been unsuccessful because the research focus was too broad. The characteristic processing strategies that individuals display in multicriteria decision-making may, to some extent, be a function of more general limitations in their information processing capabilities. With an understanding of the impacts of cognitive strategies and the relationship linking general and specific influences on information processing, information and decision support systems can be designed that better conform to or accommodate decision makers' dominant cognitive processes.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":384442,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive strategy: a research perspective for systems design\",\"authors\":\"P. Kirs, L. Volonino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this empirical study was to examine one of the aspects of cognitive processes, namely, cognitive strategies, for multiple-criteria decisions. The results indicate that there are differences in performance, efficiency, and confidence due to the moderating effects of cognitive strategy, particularly when that strategy is interfered with. Attempts to accommodate decision-makers' cognitive styles may have been unsuccessful because the research focus was too broad. The characteristic processing strategies that individuals display in multicriteria decision-making may, to some extent, be a function of more general limitations in their information processing capabilities. With an understanding of the impacts of cognitive strategies and the relationship linking general and specific influences on information processing, information and decision support systems can be designed that better conform to or accommodate decision makers' dominant cognitive processes.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":384442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本实证研究的目的是研究认知过程的一个方面,即多标准决策的认知策略。结果表明,由于认知策略的调节作用,特别是当该策略受到干扰时,表现,效率和信心存在差异。试图适应决策者的认知风格可能是不成功的,因为研究的重点太广了。个体在多标准决策中表现出的特征处理策略,在某种程度上可能是其信息处理能力更普遍限制的一个功能。通过了解认知策略的影响以及信息处理中一般和特定影响之间的关系,信息和决策支持系统可以被设计成更好地符合或适应决策者的主导认知过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive strategy: a research perspective for systems design
The purpose of this empirical study was to examine one of the aspects of cognitive processes, namely, cognitive strategies, for multiple-criteria decisions. The results indicate that there are differences in performance, efficiency, and confidence due to the moderating effects of cognitive strategy, particularly when that strategy is interfered with. Attempts to accommodate decision-makers' cognitive styles may have been unsuccessful because the research focus was too broad. The characteristic processing strategies that individuals display in multicriteria decision-making may, to some extent, be a function of more general limitations in their information processing capabilities. With an understanding of the impacts of cognitive strategies and the relationship linking general and specific influences on information processing, information and decision support systems can be designed that better conform to or accommodate decision makers' dominant cognitive processes.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信