资产流动性、债务契约和财务困境中的管理自由裁量权:洛杉矶齿轮的崩溃

H. DeAngelo, L. Deangelo, Karen H. Wruck
{"title":"资产流动性、债务契约和财务困境中的管理自由裁量权:洛杉矶齿轮的崩溃","authors":"H. DeAngelo, L. Deangelo, Karen H. Wruck","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.273729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A hot growth stock in the 1980s, L.A. Gear's equity fell from $1 billion in market value in 1989 to zero in 1998. For over six years as revenues declined precipitously, management tried a series of radical strategy shifts while subsidizing the firm's large losses through working-capital liquidations. The L.A. Gear case illustrates that asset liquidity (broadly construed, not limited to excess cash) can give managers substantial operating discretion during financial distress. It also shows (i) that debt covenants can be stronger disciplinary mechanisms than requirements to meet cash interest payments, (ii) why debt contracts typically constrain earnings instead of cash flow, (iii) why cash balances are not equivalent to negative debt, and (iv) why debt maturity matters. We find that many firms have highly liquid asset structures, thus their managers have the potential to subsidize losing operations should the need arise.","PeriodicalId":122698,"journal":{"name":"Micro: Organizational Behavior (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"150","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asset Liquidity, Debt Covenants, and Managerial Discretion in Financial Distress: The Collapse of L.A. Gear\",\"authors\":\"H. DeAngelo, L. Deangelo, Karen H. Wruck\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.273729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A hot growth stock in the 1980s, L.A. Gear's equity fell from $1 billion in market value in 1989 to zero in 1998. For over six years as revenues declined precipitously, management tried a series of radical strategy shifts while subsidizing the firm's large losses through working-capital liquidations. The L.A. Gear case illustrates that asset liquidity (broadly construed, not limited to excess cash) can give managers substantial operating discretion during financial distress. It also shows (i) that debt covenants can be stronger disciplinary mechanisms than requirements to meet cash interest payments, (ii) why debt contracts typically constrain earnings instead of cash flow, (iii) why cash balances are not equivalent to negative debt, and (iv) why debt maturity matters. We find that many firms have highly liquid asset structures, thus their managers have the potential to subsidize losing operations should the need arise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Micro: Organizational Behavior (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"150\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Micro: Organizational Behavior (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.273729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micro: Organizational Behavior (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.273729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 150

摘要

作为20世纪80年代炙手可热的成长型股票,L.A. Gear的市值从1989年的10亿美元跌至1998年的零。在六年多的时间里,随着收入急剧下降,管理层尝试了一系列激进的战略转变,同时通过流动资金清算来补贴公司的巨额亏损。L.A. Gear的案例说明,资产流动性(广义上说,不仅限于过剩现金)可以在财务困境中赋予管理者很大的操作自由裁量权。它还表明(i)债务契约可以成为比满足现金利息支付要求更强有力的纪律机制,(ii)为什么债务合同通常约束收益而不是现金流量,(iii)为什么现金余额不等于负债务,以及(iv)为什么债务期限很重要。我们发现,许多公司拥有高流动性的资产结构,因此,如果需要的话,它们的管理者有可能补贴亏损的业务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asset Liquidity, Debt Covenants, and Managerial Discretion in Financial Distress: The Collapse of L.A. Gear
A hot growth stock in the 1980s, L.A. Gear's equity fell from $1 billion in market value in 1989 to zero in 1998. For over six years as revenues declined precipitously, management tried a series of radical strategy shifts while subsidizing the firm's large losses through working-capital liquidations. The L.A. Gear case illustrates that asset liquidity (broadly construed, not limited to excess cash) can give managers substantial operating discretion during financial distress. It also shows (i) that debt covenants can be stronger disciplinary mechanisms than requirements to meet cash interest payments, (ii) why debt contracts typically constrain earnings instead of cash flow, (iii) why cash balances are not equivalent to negative debt, and (iv) why debt maturity matters. We find that many firms have highly liquid asset structures, thus their managers have the potential to subsidize losing operations should the need arise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信