反馈型认知与临床应用

G. Ee
{"title":"反馈型认知与临床应用","authors":"G. Ee","doi":"10.29199/2637-7055/dsrt-301026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose/Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate students’ perceptions and clinical applications of feedback in Clinical Dental Hygiene Education in 2019. The study explores Ego-Stroking Sandwich feedback and Non-Sandwich feedback as the feedback types and Instructors feedback vs. Scoring guide feedback as the feedback delivery method. Methods: Eleven participants participated in the study. An initial questionnaire assessing perceptions of feedback was administered. Participants performed a maxillary and a mandibular impression while receiving a type of feedback; the impressions were evaluated using a scoring guide. A post impression questionnaire was administered to gather participants’ perceptions on preferred feedback delivery method. Results: The results show that Ego Stroking Sandwich and Motivation ( was slightly less effective than Non-Sandwich and Encouragement ( and the Instructor Feedback subscale ( had a statistically significant higher mean for students in the Ego Stroking Sandwich condition than the Scoring Guide subscale did ( M= 2.67 , SD .242 ). The instructor feedback subscale had a statistically significant higher mean ( M= 3.70, SD = .253 ) for students in the Non-Sandwich condition than the Scoring Guide subscale did ( M= 2.71, SD = .149 ). These results indicate that students prefer instructor feedback to scoring guide feedback. the In order to deliver feedback effectively, instructors must understand different types of feedback available and different ways of delivering feedback in the clinical setting to foster self-efficacy. Ramany and Krackov, present a summary of twelve tips for effective implementation of feedback techniques in the clinical setting. Some of the discussion on feedback here, involves the establishing of a respectful environment, goal setting and communicating goals in a clear and direct way so that objectives for feedback are set, focusing feedback on performance, and the use of neutral, specific language to focus on performance. In addition, the success of feedback orientation depends on setting professional development opportunities for faculty and staff and creating an institutional atmosphere where feedback is Stroking Sandwich Type feedback that uses ego-stroking statements at the beginning and end.","PeriodicalId":439136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Sciences Research and Therapy","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and Clinical Applications of Feedback Type\",\"authors\":\"G. Ee\",\"doi\":\"10.29199/2637-7055/dsrt-301026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose/Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate students’ perceptions and clinical applications of feedback in Clinical Dental Hygiene Education in 2019. The study explores Ego-Stroking Sandwich feedback and Non-Sandwich feedback as the feedback types and Instructors feedback vs. Scoring guide feedback as the feedback delivery method. Methods: Eleven participants participated in the study. An initial questionnaire assessing perceptions of feedback was administered. Participants performed a maxillary and a mandibular impression while receiving a type of feedback; the impressions were evaluated using a scoring guide. A post impression questionnaire was administered to gather participants’ perceptions on preferred feedback delivery method. Results: The results show that Ego Stroking Sandwich and Motivation ( was slightly less effective than Non-Sandwich and Encouragement ( and the Instructor Feedback subscale ( had a statistically significant higher mean for students in the Ego Stroking Sandwich condition than the Scoring Guide subscale did ( M= 2.67 , SD .242 ). The instructor feedback subscale had a statistically significant higher mean ( M= 3.70, SD = .253 ) for students in the Non-Sandwich condition than the Scoring Guide subscale did ( M= 2.71, SD = .149 ). These results indicate that students prefer instructor feedback to scoring guide feedback. the In order to deliver feedback effectively, instructors must understand different types of feedback available and different ways of delivering feedback in the clinical setting to foster self-efficacy. Ramany and Krackov, present a summary of twelve tips for effective implementation of feedback techniques in the clinical setting. Some of the discussion on feedback here, involves the establishing of a respectful environment, goal setting and communicating goals in a clear and direct way so that objectives for feedback are set, focusing feedback on performance, and the use of neutral, specific language to focus on performance. In addition, the success of feedback orientation depends on setting professional development opportunities for faculty and staff and creating an institutional atmosphere where feedback is Stroking Sandwich Type feedback that uses ego-stroking statements at the beginning and end.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Sciences Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Sciences Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29199/2637-7055/dsrt-301026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Sciences Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29199/2637-7055/dsrt-301026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的/目的:本研究旨在评估2019年度临床口腔卫生教育中学生对反馈的认知及临床应用情况。本研究探讨了自我抚摸三明治反馈和非三明治反馈作为反馈类型,教师反馈和计分指南反馈作为反馈传递方式。方法:11名受试者参与研究。初步问卷评估反馈的看法进行了管理。参与者在接受一种反馈的同时进行上颌和下颌印模;使用评分指南对印象进行评估。通过一份事后印象问卷来收集参与者对首选反馈传递方法的看法。结果:结果表明,自我抚摸三明治和动机(效果略低于非三明治和鼓励),教师反馈子量表(效果均值高于评分指南子量表(M= 2.67, SD .242)。非三明治组学生的教师反馈分量表均值(M= 3.70, SD = 0.253)高于评分指南分量表均值(M= 2.71, SD = 0.149)。这些结果表明,学生更喜欢教师的反馈,而不是评分指导的反馈。为了有效地提供反馈,教师必须了解不同类型的反馈,以及在临床环境中提供反馈的不同方式,以培养自我效能感。Ramany和Krackov总结了在临床环境中有效实施反馈技术的12个技巧。关于反馈的一些讨论,包括建立一个相互尊重的环境,目标设定和以清晰直接的方式沟通目标,以便设定反馈的目标,将反馈集中在绩效上,以及使用中立的,特定的语言来关注绩效。此外,反馈导向的成功取决于为教职员工设置专业发展机会,并创造一种制度氛围,在这种氛围中,反馈是“抚摸三明治”式的反馈,在开始和结束时使用自我抚摸的陈述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions and Clinical Applications of Feedback Type
Purpose/Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate students’ perceptions and clinical applications of feedback in Clinical Dental Hygiene Education in 2019. The study explores Ego-Stroking Sandwich feedback and Non-Sandwich feedback as the feedback types and Instructors feedback vs. Scoring guide feedback as the feedback delivery method. Methods: Eleven participants participated in the study. An initial questionnaire assessing perceptions of feedback was administered. Participants performed a maxillary and a mandibular impression while receiving a type of feedback; the impressions were evaluated using a scoring guide. A post impression questionnaire was administered to gather participants’ perceptions on preferred feedback delivery method. Results: The results show that Ego Stroking Sandwich and Motivation ( was slightly less effective than Non-Sandwich and Encouragement ( and the Instructor Feedback subscale ( had a statistically significant higher mean for students in the Ego Stroking Sandwich condition than the Scoring Guide subscale did ( M= 2.67 , SD .242 ). The instructor feedback subscale had a statistically significant higher mean ( M= 3.70, SD = .253 ) for students in the Non-Sandwich condition than the Scoring Guide subscale did ( M= 2.71, SD = .149 ). These results indicate that students prefer instructor feedback to scoring guide feedback. the In order to deliver feedback effectively, instructors must understand different types of feedback available and different ways of delivering feedback in the clinical setting to foster self-efficacy. Ramany and Krackov, present a summary of twelve tips for effective implementation of feedback techniques in the clinical setting. Some of the discussion on feedback here, involves the establishing of a respectful environment, goal setting and communicating goals in a clear and direct way so that objectives for feedback are set, focusing feedback on performance, and the use of neutral, specific language to focus on performance. In addition, the success of feedback orientation depends on setting professional development opportunities for faculty and staff and creating an institutional atmosphere where feedback is Stroking Sandwich Type feedback that uses ego-stroking statements at the beginning and end.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信