O. Skibitzki, A. Paszuk, F. Hatami, P. Zaumseil, Y. Yamamoto, M. Schubert, A. Trampert, B. Tillack, W. Masselink, T. Hannappel, T. Schroeder
{"title":"基于Si(001)的栅格工程Si1−xgex缓冲器,用于GaP集成","authors":"O. Skibitzki, A. Paszuk, F. Hatami, P. Zaumseil, Y. Yamamoto, M. Schubert, A. Trampert, B. Tillack, W. Masselink, T. Hannappel, T. Schroeder","doi":"10.1063/1.4864777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"XRD techniques determined that 270 nm GaP grown on 400 nm Si0.85Ge0.15/Si(001) substrates by MOCVD is single crystalline and pseudomorphic, but carry a 0.07% tensile strain after cooling down to room temperature due to the bigger thermal expansion coefficient of GaP with respect to Si (Fig. 2). TEM and AFM examinations indicated a closed but defective GaP layer (Fig. 3(a)) with low root mean square of roughness (rms) of 3.0 nm for 1 μm2 surface area (Fig. 3(b)). Although TEM studies confirm the absence of misfit dislocations in the pseudomorphic GaP film, growth defects (e.g. stacking faults, microtwins, and anti-phase domains) are detected, concentrating at the GaP/SiGe interface (Fig. 3(c)-(d), Fig. 4). We interpret these growth defects as a residue of the initial 3D island coalescence phase of the GaP film on the Si0.85Ge0.15 buffer. TEM-EDX studies reveal that the observed growth defects are often correlated with stoichiometric inhomogeneities in the GaP film (not shown here). Finally, ToF-SIMS detects sharp heterointerfaces between GaP and SiGe films with a minor level of Ga diffusion into the SiGe buffer (Fig. 5).","PeriodicalId":371483,"journal":{"name":"2014 7th International Silicon-Germanium Technology and Device Meeting (ISTDM)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lattice-engineered Si1−xGex-buffer on Si(001) for GaP integration\",\"authors\":\"O. Skibitzki, A. Paszuk, F. Hatami, P. Zaumseil, Y. Yamamoto, M. Schubert, A. Trampert, B. Tillack, W. Masselink, T. Hannappel, T. Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.4864777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"XRD techniques determined that 270 nm GaP grown on 400 nm Si0.85Ge0.15/Si(001) substrates by MOCVD is single crystalline and pseudomorphic, but carry a 0.07% tensile strain after cooling down to room temperature due to the bigger thermal expansion coefficient of GaP with respect to Si (Fig. 2). TEM and AFM examinations indicated a closed but defective GaP layer (Fig. 3(a)) with low root mean square of roughness (rms) of 3.0 nm for 1 μm2 surface area (Fig. 3(b)). Although TEM studies confirm the absence of misfit dislocations in the pseudomorphic GaP film, growth defects (e.g. stacking faults, microtwins, and anti-phase domains) are detected, concentrating at the GaP/SiGe interface (Fig. 3(c)-(d), Fig. 4). We interpret these growth defects as a residue of the initial 3D island coalescence phase of the GaP film on the Si0.85Ge0.15 buffer. TEM-EDX studies reveal that the observed growth defects are often correlated with stoichiometric inhomogeneities in the GaP film (not shown here). Finally, ToF-SIMS detects sharp heterointerfaces between GaP and SiGe films with a minor level of Ga diffusion into the SiGe buffer (Fig. 5).\",\"PeriodicalId\":371483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 7th International Silicon-Germanium Technology and Device Meeting (ISTDM)\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 7th International Silicon-Germanium Technology and Device Meeting (ISTDM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4864777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 7th International Silicon-Germanium Technology and Device Meeting (ISTDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4864777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lattice-engineered Si1−xGex-buffer on Si(001) for GaP integration
XRD techniques determined that 270 nm GaP grown on 400 nm Si0.85Ge0.15/Si(001) substrates by MOCVD is single crystalline and pseudomorphic, but carry a 0.07% tensile strain after cooling down to room temperature due to the bigger thermal expansion coefficient of GaP with respect to Si (Fig. 2). TEM and AFM examinations indicated a closed but defective GaP layer (Fig. 3(a)) with low root mean square of roughness (rms) of 3.0 nm for 1 μm2 surface area (Fig. 3(b)). Although TEM studies confirm the absence of misfit dislocations in the pseudomorphic GaP film, growth defects (e.g. stacking faults, microtwins, and anti-phase domains) are detected, concentrating at the GaP/SiGe interface (Fig. 3(c)-(d), Fig. 4). We interpret these growth defects as a residue of the initial 3D island coalescence phase of the GaP film on the Si0.85Ge0.15 buffer. TEM-EDX studies reveal that the observed growth defects are often correlated with stoichiometric inhomogeneities in the GaP film (not shown here). Finally, ToF-SIMS detects sharp heterointerfaces between GaP and SiGe films with a minor level of Ga diffusion into the SiGe buffer (Fig. 5).