可持续的批评?

P. Bierl
{"title":"可持续的批评?","authors":"P. Bierl","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2015-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay is discussing the theoretical background of the present Degrowth-Movement with a focus on the German debate. The main thesis is that major parts of this movement are lacking an adequate understanding of capitalism. Instead the vague term growth is used to explain ecological devastation and climate change and its impact on humankind and nature. Growth is analyzed as a consequence of moral shortcomings as greed, wrong or exaggerated consum or of a growth-ideology, the latter argument is tautologic. Especially Niko Paech, who is dominating the discourse in Germany, takes a conservative point of view, which is usually ignored.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nachhaltige Kritik?\",\"authors\":\"P. Bierl\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zksp-2015-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay is discussing the theoretical background of the present Degrowth-Movement with a focus on the German debate. The main thesis is that major parts of this movement are lacking an adequate understanding of capitalism. Instead the vague term growth is used to explain ecological devastation and climate change and its impact on humankind and nature. Growth is analyzed as a consequence of moral shortcomings as greed, wrong or exaggerated consum or of a growth-ideology, the latter argument is tautologic. Especially Niko Paech, who is dominating the discourse in Germany, takes a conservative point of view, which is usually ignored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2015-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文讨论了当前反增长运动的理论背景,并以德国的辩论为重点。主要论点是,这场运动的主要部分缺乏对资本主义的充分理解。相反,“增长”这个模糊的术语被用来解释生态破坏和气候变化及其对人类和自然的影响。增长被分析为道德缺陷的结果,如贪婪、错误或夸大的消费或增长意识形态,后一种论点是重复的。尤其是在德国占据主导地位的Niko Paech,他的保守观点通常被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nachhaltige Kritik?
The essay is discussing the theoretical background of the present Degrowth-Movement with a focus on the German debate. The main thesis is that major parts of this movement are lacking an adequate understanding of capitalism. Instead the vague term growth is used to explain ecological devastation and climate change and its impact on humankind and nature. Growth is analyzed as a consequence of moral shortcomings as greed, wrong or exaggerated consum or of a growth-ideology, the latter argument is tautologic. Especially Niko Paech, who is dominating the discourse in Germany, takes a conservative point of view, which is usually ignored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信