基于隐式相似度的不同变换模型对遥感图像配准精度的影响

Q. Ye, Yahui Yao, Popo Gui, Cuifang Ai
{"title":"基于隐式相似度的不同变换模型对遥感图像配准精度的影响","authors":"Q. Ye, Yahui Yao, Popo Gui, Cuifang Ai","doi":"10.1117/12.2204788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How the different transformation models take effects on the registration accuracy based-on implicit similarity between the remote sensing images is the key point of this paper. For registration between SAR and optical imagery, analyze the imaging characteristic of push-broom optical satellite image and SAR image according to their imaging models; study the impacts taken by terrain fluctuation and different transformation models. The DEM and image pairs are simulated in the experiment, the results show: in region of bigger relief, the larger the registration image size, the greater impacts are taken by different transformation models on registration accuracy. Considering the polynomial transformation model leads to the low searching efficiency, affine transformation model regards as the best model for registration, but it has low accuracy and just applies to small images(such as 200x200). For large image (such as 800x800), 8-parameters transformation model is the best choice (balance accuracy and efficiency), but adding the parameters of transformation model (such as 12-parameters) again cannot significantly improve the registration accuracy.","PeriodicalId":340728,"journal":{"name":"China Symposium on Remote Sensing","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of different transformation models on remote sensing image registration accuracy based on implicit similarity\",\"authors\":\"Q. Ye, Yahui Yao, Popo Gui, Cuifang Ai\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2204788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How the different transformation models take effects on the registration accuracy based-on implicit similarity between the remote sensing images is the key point of this paper. For registration between SAR and optical imagery, analyze the imaging characteristic of push-broom optical satellite image and SAR image according to their imaging models; study the impacts taken by terrain fluctuation and different transformation models. The DEM and image pairs are simulated in the experiment, the results show: in region of bigger relief, the larger the registration image size, the greater impacts are taken by different transformation models on registration accuracy. Considering the polynomial transformation model leads to the low searching efficiency, affine transformation model regards as the best model for registration, but it has low accuracy and just applies to small images(such as 200x200). For large image (such as 800x800), 8-parameters transformation model is the best choice (balance accuracy and efficiency), but adding the parameters of transformation model (such as 12-parameters) again cannot significantly improve the registration accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Symposium on Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"173 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Symposium on Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2204788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Symposium on Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2204788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

不同的变换模型对基于遥感影像间隐式相似度的配准精度的影响是本文研究的重点。针对SAR与光学影像的配准,根据推扫帚光学卫星影像与SAR影像的成像模型,分析其成像特性;研究地形起伏和不同转换模式对其的影响。实验中对DEM和图像对进行了模拟,结果表明:在地形较大的区域,配准图像尺寸越大,不同变换模型对配准精度的影响越大。考虑到多项式变换模型导致搜索效率低,仿射变换模型被认为是配准的最佳模型,但其精度较低,只适用于小图像(如200x200)。对于大图像(如800x800), 8参数变换模型是最佳选择(平衡精度和效率),但再次增加变换模型的参数(如12参数)并不能显著提高配准精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of different transformation models on remote sensing image registration accuracy based on implicit similarity
How the different transformation models take effects on the registration accuracy based-on implicit similarity between the remote sensing images is the key point of this paper. For registration between SAR and optical imagery, analyze the imaging characteristic of push-broom optical satellite image and SAR image according to their imaging models; study the impacts taken by terrain fluctuation and different transformation models. The DEM and image pairs are simulated in the experiment, the results show: in region of bigger relief, the larger the registration image size, the greater impacts are taken by different transformation models on registration accuracy. Considering the polynomial transformation model leads to the low searching efficiency, affine transformation model regards as the best model for registration, but it has low accuracy and just applies to small images(such as 200x200). For large image (such as 800x800), 8-parameters transformation model is the best choice (balance accuracy and efficiency), but adding the parameters of transformation model (such as 12-parameters) again cannot significantly improve the registration accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信