跨职能团队中专业技能和个人绩效的感知差异

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
Yun-Haw Chiang, Chu-Chun Hsu, Chang-Lung Hsieh
{"title":"跨职能团队中专业技能和个人绩效的感知差异","authors":"Yun-Haw Chiang,&nbsp;Chu-Chun Hsu,&nbsp;Chang-Lung Hsieh","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous studies examining diverse team knowledge resources and individual members' performance largely follow the information perspective and propose that team informational diversity may help individuals perform better. Unlike previous authors, we integrate arguments from subgroup theory and the social categorization perspective to argue that when a person works in a cross-functional team, perceiving differences in expertize with other teammates may decrease the person's social exchange relationship with colleagues, that is, team-member exchange/TMX. Thus, perceived differences in expertize with other teammates may reduce TMX and, in turn, weaken individual task performance. Moreover, team members' social exchange relationship with the leader/LMX may offset the individual's deficiency in TMX to complement the person's task performance. We examine dyadic data collected from Taiwanese worker-supervisor pairs and find support for our hypotheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"41 1","pages":"123-136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived difference in expertize and individual performance in cross-functional teams\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Haw Chiang,&nbsp;Chu-Chun Hsu,&nbsp;Chang-Lung Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjas.1717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Previous studies examining diverse team knowledge resources and individual members' performance largely follow the information perspective and propose that team informational diversity may help individuals perform better. Unlike previous authors, we integrate arguments from subgroup theory and the social categorization perspective to argue that when a person works in a cross-functional team, perceiving differences in expertize with other teammates may decrease the person's social exchange relationship with colleagues, that is, team-member exchange/TMX. Thus, perceived differences in expertize with other teammates may reduce TMX and, in turn, weaken individual task performance. Moreover, team members' social exchange relationship with the leader/LMX may offset the individual's deficiency in TMX to complement the person's task performance. We examine dyadic data collected from Taiwanese worker-supervisor pairs and find support for our hypotheses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"123-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1717\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往有关团队知识资源多样性和成员个人绩效的研究大多从信息角度出发,认为团队信息多样性可能有助于个人取得更好的绩效。与前人不同的是,我们整合了亚群理论和社会分类视角的论点,认为当一个人在一个跨职能团队中工作时,感知到与其他队友在专业知识上的差异可能会降低他与同事之间的社会交换关系,即团队成员交换/TMX。因此,感知到与其他队友在专业知识上的差异可能会降低 TMX,进而削弱个人的任务绩效。此外,团队成员与领导/LMX 的社会交换关系可能会抵消个人在 TMX 方面的不足,从而补充个人的任务绩效。我们研究了从台湾工人-主管配对中收集到的二元数据,发现这些数据支持我们的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived difference in expertize and individual performance in cross-functional teams

Previous studies examining diverse team knowledge resources and individual members' performance largely follow the information perspective and propose that team informational diversity may help individuals perform better. Unlike previous authors, we integrate arguments from subgroup theory and the social categorization perspective to argue that when a person works in a cross-functional team, perceiving differences in expertize with other teammates may decrease the person's social exchange relationship with colleagues, that is, team-member exchange/TMX. Thus, perceived differences in expertize with other teammates may reduce TMX and, in turn, weaken individual task performance. Moreover, team members' social exchange relationship with the leader/LMX may offset the individual's deficiency in TMX to complement the person's task performance. We examine dyadic data collected from Taiwanese worker-supervisor pairs and find support for our hypotheses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信