性话语作为一种象征实践和身份的方式

O. Yatsyna
{"title":"性话语作为一种象征实践和身份的方式","authors":"O. Yatsyna","doi":"10.52534/MSU-PP.6(2).2020.74-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study analyses the current state of sexuality research in post-classical science. The social dimension of sexuality as a socio-cultural transformation is considered, in which the postmodern polyphony of social practices and the phenomenon of sexual identity are analysed. It is emphasised that with the transition of sexuality from the private to the public sphere, research in psychology, sociology, and philosophy became relevant; the liberalisation of sexual behaviour has intensified discussions related to identity and gender. The purpose of the study is to analyse the discourse of sexuality as a way of defining the semantic polyphony of discursive practices of partnership and sexual identity. Discursive representation of sexuality in the studied practices was carried out based on the results of qualitative analysis of text fragments of narrative interviews and cases from the Internet. The strategy of empirical research is based on the use of a discursive approach, the basis of which provides a socioconstructivist view of social reality. It is substantiated that in the process of constructing practices the discourse of sexuality activates the mechanism of semiotisation of sexuality, which is interpreted as free, open self-disclosure of sexuality. Semiotisation of sexuality enables an individual to objectify his or her experience of constructing discursive practices and to define his or her sexual identity in them. It follows that the discourse of sexuality affects the construction of partnership practices and the constitution of sexual identity. A set of signs of sexuality that objectify the categories: value; functionality; sexuality; relationships; meaning/motive; identity. It is concluded that the discourse of sexuality is formed by a combination of social and personal meanings that denote discursive practices and identities. The practical significance of the study is that the results obtained can be used in further research on the role of sexual discourse in the disclosure of female/male sexuality in partnership practices","PeriodicalId":358637,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discourse of Sexuality as a Way of Signifying Practices and Identities\",\"authors\":\"O. Yatsyna\",\"doi\":\"10.52534/MSU-PP.6(2).2020.74-82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study analyses the current state of sexuality research in post-classical science. The social dimension of sexuality as a socio-cultural transformation is considered, in which the postmodern polyphony of social practices and the phenomenon of sexual identity are analysed. It is emphasised that with the transition of sexuality from the private to the public sphere, research in psychology, sociology, and philosophy became relevant; the liberalisation of sexual behaviour has intensified discussions related to identity and gender. The purpose of the study is to analyse the discourse of sexuality as a way of defining the semantic polyphony of discursive practices of partnership and sexual identity. Discursive representation of sexuality in the studied practices was carried out based on the results of qualitative analysis of text fragments of narrative interviews and cases from the Internet. The strategy of empirical research is based on the use of a discursive approach, the basis of which provides a socioconstructivist view of social reality. It is substantiated that in the process of constructing practices the discourse of sexuality activates the mechanism of semiotisation of sexuality, which is interpreted as free, open self-disclosure of sexuality. Semiotisation of sexuality enables an individual to objectify his or her experience of constructing discursive practices and to define his or her sexual identity in them. It follows that the discourse of sexuality affects the construction of partnership practices and the constitution of sexual identity. A set of signs of sexuality that objectify the categories: value; functionality; sexuality; relationships; meaning/motive; identity. It is concluded that the discourse of sexuality is formed by a combination of social and personal meanings that denote discursive practices and identities. The practical significance of the study is that the results obtained can be used in further research on the role of sexual discourse in the disclosure of female/male sexuality in partnership practices\",\"PeriodicalId\":358637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52534/MSU-PP.6(2).2020.74-82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52534/MSU-PP.6(2).2020.74-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了后古典科学中性研究的现状。性作为一种社会文化转型的社会维度被考虑,其中社会实践的后现代复调和性别认同的现象进行了分析。本书强调,随着性从私人领域向公共领域的转变,心理学、社会学和哲学的研究变得相关;性行为的自由化加剧了有关身份和性别的讨论。本研究的目的是分析性话语作为一种定义伴侣关系和性身份话语实践的语义复调的方式。研究实践中的性话语表征基于对叙述性访谈文本片段和网络案例的定性分析结果。实证研究的策略是基于使用话语方法,其基础是提供社会现实的社会建构主义观点。事实证明,在建构实践的过程中,性话语激活了性的符号化机制,这被解释为性的自由、开放的自我表露。性的符号化使个体能够客观化他或她建构话语实践的经验,并在其中定义他或她的性别身份。由此可见,性话语影响着伙伴关系实践的建构和性身份的构成。一系列物化这些分类的性标志:价值;功能;性;关系;意义/动机;的身份。结论是,性话语是由社会和个人意义的结合形成的,这些意义表示话语实践和身份。本研究的现实意义在于,所得结果可用于进一步研究性话语在伴侣关系实践中女性/男性性行为披露中的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discourse of Sexuality as a Way of Signifying Practices and Identities
The study analyses the current state of sexuality research in post-classical science. The social dimension of sexuality as a socio-cultural transformation is considered, in which the postmodern polyphony of social practices and the phenomenon of sexual identity are analysed. It is emphasised that with the transition of sexuality from the private to the public sphere, research in psychology, sociology, and philosophy became relevant; the liberalisation of sexual behaviour has intensified discussions related to identity and gender. The purpose of the study is to analyse the discourse of sexuality as a way of defining the semantic polyphony of discursive practices of partnership and sexual identity. Discursive representation of sexuality in the studied practices was carried out based on the results of qualitative analysis of text fragments of narrative interviews and cases from the Internet. The strategy of empirical research is based on the use of a discursive approach, the basis of which provides a socioconstructivist view of social reality. It is substantiated that in the process of constructing practices the discourse of sexuality activates the mechanism of semiotisation of sexuality, which is interpreted as free, open self-disclosure of sexuality. Semiotisation of sexuality enables an individual to objectify his or her experience of constructing discursive practices and to define his or her sexual identity in them. It follows that the discourse of sexuality affects the construction of partnership practices and the constitution of sexual identity. A set of signs of sexuality that objectify the categories: value; functionality; sexuality; relationships; meaning/motive; identity. It is concluded that the discourse of sexuality is formed by a combination of social and personal meanings that denote discursive practices and identities. The practical significance of the study is that the results obtained can be used in further research on the role of sexual discourse in the disclosure of female/male sexuality in partnership practices
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信