社会权利与用户收费:抵抗还是包容

Amir Paz-Fuchs
{"title":"社会权利与用户收费:抵抗还是包容","authors":"Amir Paz-Fuchs","doi":"10.4324/9781315524337-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Along with privatisation, contracting out and “new” management techniques, one of the important, but less discussed, manifestations of the way neo-liberal ideology and policies have changed social services is through the requirement that individuals pay for public services that were once offered free of charge. In the UK, for example, over 600 individual services impose user charges. A similar, but alternative, method is to offer a premium service in a given sector (e.g. health, education) at a prescribed cost. As an indication of the importance of the trend, the OECD has recently offered a definition of user charges which is relatively straightforward: “payments made by consumers to providers of government services”. Moreover, with the change of policy comes an additional change, that of expectations. If people once expected free (at the point of consumption, not production, of course) services, current generations are increasingly accustomed to receiving social services at a cost. Through these relatively small charges, the relationship between the citizen and the state is being transformed. The citizen, we are told, is now the ‘citizen-consumer’, who “expects improved standards from public services, in line with those supplied by the private sector”. Replicating free market services, such charges are seen as part of an overall strategy to “roll back the frontiers of the state”. \nBut if that is the case, where do rights come in? Rights, after all, are “especially sturdy objects to stand upon, a most useful sort of moral furniture”. They have the potential, at the very least, to alter the confines of the debate that would have taken place in their absence. A world without the right to freedom of speech, we assume, would be different from a world in which such a right is granted and respected. Focusing on social services in general, and on health and education in particular, we therefore need to inquire what impact social rights may have on this trend or on its effects.","PeriodicalId":208075,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Rights and User Charges: Resistance or Subsumption\",\"authors\":\"Amir Paz-Fuchs\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315524337-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Along with privatisation, contracting out and “new” management techniques, one of the important, but less discussed, manifestations of the way neo-liberal ideology and policies have changed social services is through the requirement that individuals pay for public services that were once offered free of charge. In the UK, for example, over 600 individual services impose user charges. A similar, but alternative, method is to offer a premium service in a given sector (e.g. health, education) at a prescribed cost. As an indication of the importance of the trend, the OECD has recently offered a definition of user charges which is relatively straightforward: “payments made by consumers to providers of government services”. Moreover, with the change of policy comes an additional change, that of expectations. If people once expected free (at the point of consumption, not production, of course) services, current generations are increasingly accustomed to receiving social services at a cost. Through these relatively small charges, the relationship between the citizen and the state is being transformed. The citizen, we are told, is now the ‘citizen-consumer’, who “expects improved standards from public services, in line with those supplied by the private sector”. Replicating free market services, such charges are seen as part of an overall strategy to “roll back the frontiers of the state”. \\nBut if that is the case, where do rights come in? Rights, after all, are “especially sturdy objects to stand upon, a most useful sort of moral furniture”. They have the potential, at the very least, to alter the confines of the debate that would have taken place in their absence. A world without the right to freedom of speech, we assume, would be different from a world in which such a right is granted and respected. Focusing on social services in general, and on health and education in particular, we therefore need to inquire what impact social rights may have on this trend or on its effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice\",\"volume\":\"223 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315524337-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315524337-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

除了私有化、外包和“新”管理技术之外,新自由主义意识形态和政策改变社会服务方式的一个重要但较少讨论的表现是,要求个人为曾经免费提供的公共服务付费。例如,在英国,超过600种个人服务对用户收费。另一种类似但可供选择的方法是以规定的费用在特定部门(如卫生、教育)提供优质服务。为了表明这一趋势的重要性,经合组织最近对用户收费给出了一个相对简单的定义:“消费者向政府服务提供者支付的费用”。此外,随着政策的变化,还有一个额外的变化,即预期的变化。如果人们曾经期待免费的(当然是在消费的时候,而不是在生产的时候)服务,那么现在这代人越来越习惯于接受有成本的社会服务。通过这些相对较小的收费,公民与国家之间的关系正在发生转变。我们被告知,公民现在是“公民消费者”,他们“期望公共服务的标准提高,与私营部门提供的服务保持一致”。复制自由市场服务,这种收费被视为“缩小国家边界”整体战略的一部分。但如果是这样的话,权利从何而来?毕竟,权利是“特别坚固的支柱,是最有用的道德家具”。他们至少有可能改变在他们缺席的情况下辩论的范围。我们认为,一个没有言论自由权的世界,将与一个给予并尊重言论自由权的世界不同。因此,我们将重点放在一般的社会服务,特别是保健和教育上,需要调查社会权利对这一趋势或其影响可能产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Rights and User Charges: Resistance or Subsumption
Along with privatisation, contracting out and “new” management techniques, one of the important, but less discussed, manifestations of the way neo-liberal ideology and policies have changed social services is through the requirement that individuals pay for public services that were once offered free of charge. In the UK, for example, over 600 individual services impose user charges. A similar, but alternative, method is to offer a premium service in a given sector (e.g. health, education) at a prescribed cost. As an indication of the importance of the trend, the OECD has recently offered a definition of user charges which is relatively straightforward: “payments made by consumers to providers of government services”. Moreover, with the change of policy comes an additional change, that of expectations. If people once expected free (at the point of consumption, not production, of course) services, current generations are increasingly accustomed to receiving social services at a cost. Through these relatively small charges, the relationship between the citizen and the state is being transformed. The citizen, we are told, is now the ‘citizen-consumer’, who “expects improved standards from public services, in line with those supplied by the private sector”. Replicating free market services, such charges are seen as part of an overall strategy to “roll back the frontiers of the state”. But if that is the case, where do rights come in? Rights, after all, are “especially sturdy objects to stand upon, a most useful sort of moral furniture”. They have the potential, at the very least, to alter the confines of the debate that would have taken place in their absence. A world without the right to freedom of speech, we assume, would be different from a world in which such a right is granted and respected. Focusing on social services in general, and on health and education in particular, we therefore need to inquire what impact social rights may have on this trend or on its effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信