土壤之子:宪政还是便利的联邦制?哈里亚纳邦2020年当地候选人就业法案分析

Romit Nandan Sahai
{"title":"土壤之子:宪政还是便利的联邦制?哈里亚纳邦2020年当地候选人就业法案分析","authors":"Romit Nandan Sahai","doi":"10.55031/mshare.2021.39.lw.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years India has witnessed an alarming trend of domicile reservations being enacted in its States at the relegation of the unitary citizenry mandated by the constitution. One of the much such legislation is the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Bill which was tabled & passed in 2020. The Bill has been controverted on two counts; namely the unclear legality of the domicile reservation that it creates and the implementation of that reservation to the private sector. The paper aims to highlight the premise of domicile reservation and the extent of its precarious constitutionality. Next it would explore discourse of rationality through-the-lens-of reasonable differentia to see whether the reservation provided holds any merit to its object & purpose. Lastly, it would showcase the implications of such a policy on the Nation’s wheel of economy and argue a defense as to why such policies are not in tandem with the interests of the country.","PeriodicalId":233824,"journal":{"name":"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sons of Soil: A constitutional or convenient federalism? An analysis of Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Bill, 2020\",\"authors\":\"Romit Nandan Sahai\",\"doi\":\"10.55031/mshare.2021.39.lw.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the years India has witnessed an alarming trend of domicile reservations being enacted in its States at the relegation of the unitary citizenry mandated by the constitution. One of the much such legislation is the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Bill which was tabled & passed in 2020. The Bill has been controverted on two counts; namely the unclear legality of the domicile reservation that it creates and the implementation of that reservation to the private sector. The paper aims to highlight the premise of domicile reservation and the extent of its precarious constitutionality. Next it would explore discourse of rationality through-the-lens-of reasonable differentia to see whether the reservation provided holds any merit to its object & purpose. Lastly, it would showcase the implications of such a policy on the Nation’s wheel of economy and argue a defense as to why such policies are not in tandem with the interests of the country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"197 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55031/mshare.2021.39.lw.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55031/mshare.2021.39.lw.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,印度目睹了一种令人震惊的趋势,即在其各邦废除宪法规定的单一公民身份时,正在实施住所保留。其中一项立法是哈里亚纳邦当地候选人就业法案,该法案于2020年提交并通过。该法案在两个方面受到争议;即它所造成的住所保留的合法性不明确以及该保留对私营部门的执行情况。本文旨在突出户籍保留的前提及其不稳定合宪性的程度。接下来,本文将通过合理差异的视角来探讨理性话语,看看所提供的保留是否对其目标和目的有任何价值。最后,它将展示这种政策对国家经济车轮的影响,并为为什么这种政策与国家利益不一致进行辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sons of Soil: A constitutional or convenient federalism? An analysis of Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Bill, 2020
Over the years India has witnessed an alarming trend of domicile reservations being enacted in its States at the relegation of the unitary citizenry mandated by the constitution. One of the much such legislation is the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Bill which was tabled & passed in 2020. The Bill has been controverted on two counts; namely the unclear legality of the domicile reservation that it creates and the implementation of that reservation to the private sector. The paper aims to highlight the premise of domicile reservation and the extent of its precarious constitutionality. Next it would explore discourse of rationality through-the-lens-of reasonable differentia to see whether the reservation provided holds any merit to its object & purpose. Lastly, it would showcase the implications of such a policy on the Nation’s wheel of economy and argue a defense as to why such policies are not in tandem with the interests of the country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信