固定翼无人机嵌入式系统设计:仿真飞行器选择的动力学模型研究

R. Louali, M. Djouadi, A. Nemra, S. Bouaziz, A. Elouardi
{"title":"固定翼无人机嵌入式系统设计:仿真飞行器选择的动力学模型研究","authors":"R. Louali, M. Djouadi, A. Nemra, S. Bouaziz, A. Elouardi","doi":"10.1109/SSD.2014.6808827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are a special class of UAVs which present many advantages notably long range of action. Whereas, design of this kind of UAVs requires heavy logistics like outdoor tests, runways, and experimented pilots. These constraints reverberate on the design of embedded systems for fixed-wing UAVs. Because static tests are not representative, this paper proposes a practical approach to evaluate an embedded system on an appropriate vehicle emulating the dynamic model of a fixed-wing aircraft. For that, a comparison between the dynamic model of fixed-wing aircraft, tank-type mobile robot, and a bicycle is achieved. We show that, contrary to trend in literature, a mobile robot is not the optimal choice to emulate a fixed-wing UAV. Indeed, supposing a motion without slip (and a constant altitude for the aircraft), translation models of the three vehicles are under the form of Dubin car model. Whereas, translation and rotation velocities of tank-type mobile robot are coupled (while it is not the case for the aircraft where propulsion and turning are actuated separately). This constraint defines an allowed kinematic zone which limits the emulation of a fixed wing airplane. In the other hand, in bicycle model “bank to turn effect” is similar to the one observed in fixed-wing aircraft model. Furthermore, both models are not defined when the translation velocity tends to zero (stalling effect). As a conclusion, we propose to use mobile robot to test the navigation layer, and the bicycle to evaluate the sensor processing layer of an embedded system based fixed-wing UAVs applications.","PeriodicalId":168063,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD14)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing embedded systems for fixed-wing UAVs: Dynamic models study for the choice of an emulation vehicle\",\"authors\":\"R. Louali, M. Djouadi, A. Nemra, S. Bouaziz, A. Elouardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SSD.2014.6808827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are a special class of UAVs which present many advantages notably long range of action. Whereas, design of this kind of UAVs requires heavy logistics like outdoor tests, runways, and experimented pilots. These constraints reverberate on the design of embedded systems for fixed-wing UAVs. Because static tests are not representative, this paper proposes a practical approach to evaluate an embedded system on an appropriate vehicle emulating the dynamic model of a fixed-wing aircraft. For that, a comparison between the dynamic model of fixed-wing aircraft, tank-type mobile robot, and a bicycle is achieved. We show that, contrary to trend in literature, a mobile robot is not the optimal choice to emulate a fixed-wing UAV. Indeed, supposing a motion without slip (and a constant altitude for the aircraft), translation models of the three vehicles are under the form of Dubin car model. Whereas, translation and rotation velocities of tank-type mobile robot are coupled (while it is not the case for the aircraft where propulsion and turning are actuated separately). This constraint defines an allowed kinematic zone which limits the emulation of a fixed wing airplane. In the other hand, in bicycle model “bank to turn effect” is similar to the one observed in fixed-wing aircraft model. Furthermore, both models are not defined when the translation velocity tends to zero (stalling effect). As a conclusion, we propose to use mobile robot to test the navigation layer, and the bicycle to evaluate the sensor processing layer of an embedded system based fixed-wing UAVs applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD14)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD14)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2014.6808827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD14)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2014.6808827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

固定翼无人机(UAVs)是一类特殊的无人机,具有许多优点,特别是远距离行动。然而,这种无人机的设计需要繁重的后勤工作,如户外测试、跑道和实验飞行员。这些制约因素影响了固定翼无人机嵌入式系统的设计。由于静态测试不具有代表性,本文提出了一种实用的方法来评估嵌入式系统在适当的车辆上模拟固定翼飞机的动态模型。为此,对固定翼飞机、坦克式移动机器人和自行车的动力学模型进行了比较。我们表明,与文献趋势相反,移动机器人不是模拟固定翼无人机的最佳选择。的确,假设运动无滑移(飞行器高度恒定),三种飞行器的平移模型均采用杜宾汽车模型的形式。而坦克式移动机器人的平移速度和旋转速度是耦合的(而飞机的推进速度和转向速度是分开驱动的)。这个约束定义了一个允许的运动区域,它限制了固定翼飞机的仿真。另一方面,自行车模型中的“倾斜转向效应”与固定翼飞机模型中的“倾斜转向效应”相似。此外,当平移速度趋于零(失速效应)时,两个模型都不定义。综上所述,我们建议用移动机器人测试导航层,用自行车评估基于嵌入式系统的固定翼无人机传感器处理层的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing embedded systems for fixed-wing UAVs: Dynamic models study for the choice of an emulation vehicle
Fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are a special class of UAVs which present many advantages notably long range of action. Whereas, design of this kind of UAVs requires heavy logistics like outdoor tests, runways, and experimented pilots. These constraints reverberate on the design of embedded systems for fixed-wing UAVs. Because static tests are not representative, this paper proposes a practical approach to evaluate an embedded system on an appropriate vehicle emulating the dynamic model of a fixed-wing aircraft. For that, a comparison between the dynamic model of fixed-wing aircraft, tank-type mobile robot, and a bicycle is achieved. We show that, contrary to trend in literature, a mobile robot is not the optimal choice to emulate a fixed-wing UAV. Indeed, supposing a motion without slip (and a constant altitude for the aircraft), translation models of the three vehicles are under the form of Dubin car model. Whereas, translation and rotation velocities of tank-type mobile robot are coupled (while it is not the case for the aircraft where propulsion and turning are actuated separately). This constraint defines an allowed kinematic zone which limits the emulation of a fixed wing airplane. In the other hand, in bicycle model “bank to turn effect” is similar to the one observed in fixed-wing aircraft model. Furthermore, both models are not defined when the translation velocity tends to zero (stalling effect). As a conclusion, we propose to use mobile robot to test the navigation layer, and the bicycle to evaluate the sensor processing layer of an embedded system based fixed-wing UAVs applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信