评估面向代理的软件工程方法

F. Parandoosh
{"title":"评估面向代理的软件工程方法","authors":"F. Parandoosh","doi":"10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past couple of decades, agent-oriented technology has been arisen in order to assist in developing intelligent software that is able to solve challenging problems. Numerous methodologies for developing agent-based systems have been proposed in the literature and the area of agent-oriented methodologies is maturing rapidly. Evaluating methodologies' strengths, weaknesses and domains of applicability plays an important role in improving them and in developing the \"next-generation\" of methodologies. In this paper, we present a reliable framework that adopts statistical techniques to compare agent-oriented methodologies. Based upon this framework we performed a comparison of four AOSE methodologies MaSE, Prometheus, Tropos and Gaia.","PeriodicalId":205589,"journal":{"name":"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Agent-Oriented Software Engineering Methodologies\",\"authors\":\"F. Parandoosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past couple of decades, agent-oriented technology has been arisen in order to assist in developing intelligent software that is able to solve challenging problems. Numerous methodologies for developing agent-based systems have been proposed in the literature and the area of agent-oriented methodologies is maturing rapidly. Evaluating methodologies' strengths, weaknesses and domains of applicability plays an important role in improving them and in developing the \\\"next-generation\\\" of methodologies. In this paper, we present a reliable framework that adopts statistical techniques to compare agent-oriented methodologies. Based upon this framework we performed a comparison of four AOSE methodologies MaSE, Prometheus, Tropos and Gaia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在过去的几十年里,为了帮助开发能够解决具有挑战性问题的智能软件,面向代理的技术已经出现。文献中已经提出了许多开发基于智能体的系统的方法,并且面向智能体的方法领域正在迅速成熟。评估方法学的优势、劣势和适用领域在改进方法学和开发“下一代”方法学中起着重要作用。在本文中,我们提出了一个可靠的框架,采用统计技术来比较面向代理的方法。在此框架下,我们对MaSE、Prometheus、Tropos和Gaia四种AOSE方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Agent-Oriented Software Engineering Methodologies
In the past couple of decades, agent-oriented technology has been arisen in order to assist in developing intelligent software that is able to solve challenging problems. Numerous methodologies for developing agent-based systems have been proposed in the literature and the area of agent-oriented methodologies is maturing rapidly. Evaluating methodologies' strengths, weaknesses and domains of applicability plays an important role in improving them and in developing the "next-generation" of methodologies. In this paper, we present a reliable framework that adopts statistical techniques to compare agent-oriented methodologies. Based upon this framework we performed a comparison of four AOSE methodologies MaSE, Prometheus, Tropos and Gaia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信