{"title":"评估面向代理的软件工程方法","authors":"F. Parandoosh","doi":"10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past couple of decades, agent-oriented technology has been arisen in order to assist in developing intelligent software that is able to solve challenging problems. Numerous methodologies for developing agent-based systems have been proposed in the literature and the area of agent-oriented methodologies is maturing rapidly. Evaluating methodologies' strengths, weaknesses and domains of applicability plays an important role in improving them and in developing the \"next-generation\" of methodologies. In this paper, we present a reliable framework that adopts statistical techniques to compare agent-oriented methodologies. Based upon this framework we performed a comparison of four AOSE methodologies MaSE, Prometheus, Tropos and Gaia.","PeriodicalId":205589,"journal":{"name":"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Agent-Oriented Software Engineering Methodologies\",\"authors\":\"F. Parandoosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past couple of decades, agent-oriented technology has been arisen in order to assist in developing intelligent software that is able to solve challenging problems. Numerous methodologies for developing agent-based systems have been proposed in the literature and the area of agent-oriented methodologies is maturing rapidly. Evaluating methodologies' strengths, weaknesses and domains of applicability plays an important role in improving them and in developing the \\\"next-generation\\\" of methodologies. In this paper, we present a reliable framework that adopts statistical techniques to compare agent-oriented methodologies. Based upon this framework we performed a comparison of four AOSE methodologies MaSE, Prometheus, Tropos and Gaia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 2nd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOFA.2007.4318323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the past couple of decades, agent-oriented technology has been arisen in order to assist in developing intelligent software that is able to solve challenging problems. Numerous methodologies for developing agent-based systems have been proposed in the literature and the area of agent-oriented methodologies is maturing rapidly. Evaluating methodologies' strengths, weaknesses and domains of applicability plays an important role in improving them and in developing the "next-generation" of methodologies. In this paper, we present a reliable framework that adopts statistical techniques to compare agent-oriented methodologies. Based upon this framework we performed a comparison of four AOSE methodologies MaSE, Prometheus, Tropos and Gaia.