混合结构中的记忆、时间和空间:马塞尔·普鲁斯特和奥尔罕·帕穆克

Slavica Srbinovska
{"title":"混合结构中的记忆、时间和空间:马塞尔·普鲁斯特和奥尔罕·帕穆克","authors":"Slavica Srbinovska","doi":"10.37834/JCP1920105S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempts to interpret the function of memory through the structures of hybridized narration in Time Regained, the last volume of Marcel Proust's In Search of Lost Time, and Orhan Pamuk's Istanbul: Memories and the City. The subject's ability to remember is deeply connected to the temporalizing and spatializing acts of these novels. The narratorial subjectivity in both of these texts, constituted by a combination of the novel's fictional elements and the memoir's documentarian tendencies, registers the differences in the passage of time and space as a result of the reconstruction of meaning. They are both treated in relation to the process of recognizing the past. The narration of both novels insists on defeating these aspects of the phenomenal world, and re-conceiving them through a creative approach directed toward the recording of memories and the resisting of the destructive power of time. In both works, the self-analysis of the author plays a key role: a kind of procedure only made possible by the act of writing.","PeriodicalId":186551,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Philology, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, B Koneski Faculty of Philology","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memory, time and space in the hybrid structures: Marcel Proust and Orhan Pamouk\",\"authors\":\"Slavica Srbinovska\",\"doi\":\"10.37834/JCP1920105S\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study attempts to interpret the function of memory through the structures of hybridized narration in Time Regained, the last volume of Marcel Proust's In Search of Lost Time, and Orhan Pamuk's Istanbul: Memories and the City. The subject's ability to remember is deeply connected to the temporalizing and spatializing acts of these novels. The narratorial subjectivity in both of these texts, constituted by a combination of the novel's fictional elements and the memoir's documentarian tendencies, registers the differences in the passage of time and space as a result of the reconstruction of meaning. They are both treated in relation to the process of recognizing the past. The narration of both novels insists on defeating these aspects of the phenomenal world, and re-conceiving them through a creative approach directed toward the recording of memories and the resisting of the destructive power of time. In both works, the self-analysis of the author plays a key role: a kind of procedure only made possible by the act of writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Philology, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, B Koneski Faculty of Philology\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Philology, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, B Koneski Faculty of Philology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37834/JCP1920105S\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Philology, Ss Cyril and Methodius University, B Koneski Faculty of Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37834/JCP1920105S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图通过马塞尔·普鲁斯特《追忆似水年华》的最后一卷《重拾时光》和奥尔罕·帕慕克《伊斯坦布尔:记忆与城市》的混合叙事结构来解读记忆的功能。主体的记忆能力与这些小说的时间化和空间化行为密切相关。在这两种文本中,小说的虚构元素和回忆录的纪实倾向相结合而形成的叙事主体性记录了时间和空间的流逝差异,这是意义重构的结果。它们都与认识过去的过程有关。两部小说的叙事都坚持战胜现象世界的这些方面,并通过一种以记录记忆和抵抗时间破坏力为导向的创造性方式重新构想它们。在这两部作品中,作者的自我分析发挥了关键作用:一种只有通过写作行为才能实现的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Memory, time and space in the hybrid structures: Marcel Proust and Orhan Pamouk
This study attempts to interpret the function of memory through the structures of hybridized narration in Time Regained, the last volume of Marcel Proust's In Search of Lost Time, and Orhan Pamuk's Istanbul: Memories and the City. The subject's ability to remember is deeply connected to the temporalizing and spatializing acts of these novels. The narratorial subjectivity in both of these texts, constituted by a combination of the novel's fictional elements and the memoir's documentarian tendencies, registers the differences in the passage of time and space as a result of the reconstruction of meaning. They are both treated in relation to the process of recognizing the past. The narration of both novels insists on defeating these aspects of the phenomenal world, and re-conceiving them through a creative approach directed toward the recording of memories and the resisting of the destructive power of time. In both works, the self-analysis of the author plays a key role: a kind of procedure only made possible by the act of writing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信