逻辑控制器安全性和活动性的形式化验证。工具比较

Fernando Quiles García, A. Sánchez
{"title":"逻辑控制器安全性和活动性的形式化验证。工具比较","authors":"Fernando Quiles García, A. Sánchez","doi":"10.1109/ICEEE.2006.251867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preliminary results are presented of a comparison made between a model checking tool developed by our research group and Spin, a public domain model checking package. The theoretical fundaments of both tools are explicit model checking based on language emptiness. Using a simple example consisting of a set of logic controllers for driving the operation of pressurized tanks, we compare the computing performance of each stage in the model checking procedure for safety and liveness properties given as linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas. The controller ladder logic is modeled as a generalized Buchi automaton. Numerical results show a better performance of our tool for domains of up to 10 3 states","PeriodicalId":125310,"journal":{"name":"2006 3rd International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering","volume":"225 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Verification of Safety and Liveness Properties for Logic Controllers. A Tool Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Quiles García, A. Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEEE.2006.251867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preliminary results are presented of a comparison made between a model checking tool developed by our research group and Spin, a public domain model checking package. The theoretical fundaments of both tools are explicit model checking based on language emptiness. Using a simple example consisting of a set of logic controllers for driving the operation of pressurized tanks, we compare the computing performance of each stage in the model checking procedure for safety and liveness properties given as linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas. The controller ladder logic is modeled as a generalized Buchi automaton. Numerical results show a better performance of our tool for domains of up to 10 3 states\",\"PeriodicalId\":125310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 3rd International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering\",\"volume\":\"225 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 3rd International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEE.2006.251867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 3rd International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEE.2006.251867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文给出了本课题组开发的模型检查工具与公共领域模型检查包Spin的初步对比结果。这两种工具的理论基础都是基于语言空性的显式模型检查。以一组驱动增压罐运行的逻辑控制器为例,比较了以线性时间逻辑(LTL)公式给出的模型安全性和活跃性检验过程中各阶段的计算性能。该控制器的梯形逻辑被建模为一个广义的布吉自动机。数值计算结果表明,该工具在多达103个状态的域上具有较好的性能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formal Verification of Safety and Liveness Properties for Logic Controllers. A Tool Comparison
Preliminary results are presented of a comparison made between a model checking tool developed by our research group and Spin, a public domain model checking package. The theoretical fundaments of both tools are explicit model checking based on language emptiness. Using a simple example consisting of a set of logic controllers for driving the operation of pressurized tanks, we compare the computing performance of each stage in the model checking procedure for safety and liveness properties given as linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas. The controller ladder logic is modeled as a generalized Buchi automaton. Numerical results show a better performance of our tool for domains of up to 10 3 states
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信