缓存一致共享内存多处理器的写缓冲区设计

F. Mounes-Toussi, D. Lilja
{"title":"缓存一致共享内存多处理器的写缓冲区设计","authors":"F. Mounes-Toussi, D. Lilja","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.1995.528915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluate the performance impact of two different write-buffer configurations (one word per buffer entry and one block per buffer entry) and two different write policies (write-through and write-back), when using the partial block invalidation coherence mechanism in a shared-memory multiprocessor. Using an execution-driven simulator, we find that the one word per entry buffer configuration with a write-back policy is preferred for small write-buffer sizes when both buffers have an equal number of data words, and when they have equal hardware cost. Furthermore, when partial block invalidation is supported, we find that a write-through policy is preferred over a write-back policy due to its simpler cache hit detection mechanism, its elimination of write-back transactions, and its competitive-performance when the write-buffer is relatively large.","PeriodicalId":281907,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ICCD '95 International Conference on Computer Design. VLSI in Computers and Processors","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Write buffer design for cache-coherent shared-memory multiprocessors\",\"authors\":\"F. Mounes-Toussi, D. Lilja\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCD.1995.528915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We evaluate the performance impact of two different write-buffer configurations (one word per buffer entry and one block per buffer entry) and two different write policies (write-through and write-back), when using the partial block invalidation coherence mechanism in a shared-memory multiprocessor. Using an execution-driven simulator, we find that the one word per entry buffer configuration with a write-back policy is preferred for small write-buffer sizes when both buffers have an equal number of data words, and when they have equal hardware cost. Furthermore, when partial block invalidation is supported, we find that a write-through policy is preferred over a write-back policy due to its simpler cache hit detection mechanism, its elimination of write-back transactions, and its competitive-performance when the write-buffer is relatively large.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of ICCD '95 International Conference on Computer Design. VLSI in Computers and Processors\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of ICCD '95 International Conference on Computer Design. VLSI in Computers and Processors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.1995.528915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ICCD '95 International Conference on Computer Design. VLSI in Computers and Processors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.1995.528915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

当在共享内存多处理器中使用部分块无效一致性机制时,我们评估了两种不同的写缓冲区配置(每个缓冲区条目一个字,每个缓冲区条目一个块)和两种不同的写策略(透写和回写)对性能的影响。使用执行驱动的模拟器,我们发现,当两个缓冲区具有相同数量的数据字并且具有相同的硬件成本时,对于较小的写缓冲区大小,首选带有回写策略的每个条目一个字的缓冲区配置。此外,当支持部分块无效时,我们发现透写策略优于回写策略,因为它具有更简单的缓存命中检测机制、消除回写事务以及在写缓冲区相对较大时的竞争性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Write buffer design for cache-coherent shared-memory multiprocessors
We evaluate the performance impact of two different write-buffer configurations (one word per buffer entry and one block per buffer entry) and two different write policies (write-through and write-back), when using the partial block invalidation coherence mechanism in a shared-memory multiprocessor. Using an execution-driven simulator, we find that the one word per entry buffer configuration with a write-back policy is preferred for small write-buffer sizes when both buffers have an equal number of data words, and when they have equal hardware cost. Furthermore, when partial block invalidation is supported, we find that a write-through policy is preferred over a write-back policy due to its simpler cache hit detection mechanism, its elimination of write-back transactions, and its competitive-performance when the write-buffer is relatively large.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信