澳大利亚昆士兰州脊椎动物有害动物的全州优先排序

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Lana Harriott, Matt Amos, Michael Brennan, Peter Elsworth, Matthew Gentle, Malcolm Kennedy, Tony Pople, Joe Scanlan, James Speed, Olusegun O. Osunkoya
{"title":"澳大利亚昆士兰州脊椎动物有害动物的全州优先排序","authors":"Lana Harriott,&nbsp;Matt Amos,&nbsp;Michael Brennan,&nbsp;Peter Elsworth,&nbsp;Matthew Gentle,&nbsp;Malcolm Kennedy,&nbsp;Tony Pople,&nbsp;Joe Scanlan,&nbsp;James Speed,&nbsp;Olusegun O. Osunkoya","doi":"10.1111/emr.12563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Invasive organisms are key drivers of environmental change globally. Both native and non-native species can become pests that require management or control. Vertebrate pest animals may cause a range of economic, environmental and social impacts for which various plans are developed at a local, state and national scale to aid their management. There are multiple vertebrate pest species in Australia which vary in the type and severity of their negative effects. Prioritisation of these pests and their impacts is critical for management to be cost-effective. We accessed pest management plans (PMPs) from 66 (of 71) local government areas (LGAs) across the state of Queensland to collate a list of vertebrate pest species present in each LGA. Local government areas were then grouped into easily identifiable regions (Regional Organisation of Councils, ‘ROC’ regions, 10 in all) and vertebrate pest species lists were collated for each region. At regional workshops, each pest species was ranked as no, low, medium or high priority by stakeholders. Rankings were used to develop impact scores resulting in a priority list of vertebrate pest animal species at the state level. Fifty-three species were identified in individual LGA PMPs of which 25 were considered priorities at the regional level. Most species prioritised at the state level were mammals, with Wild Dogs (including Dingoes; <i>Canis familiaris</i>), Feral Pigs (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) and Feral Cats (<i>Felis catus</i>) being the three highest ranked. Similarities in priority species were evident across ROC regions, however, several regions prioritised pests specific to their location. The data supported a further amalgamation of the 10 ROC regions into five main groups based on the set of vertebrate pest species that were present. Prioritisation lists should be regularly updated as technologies develop, established pest animal impacts change and new species incursions occur.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 3","pages":"209-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12563","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State-wide prioritisation of vertebrate pest animals in Queensland, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Lana Harriott,&nbsp;Matt Amos,&nbsp;Michael Brennan,&nbsp;Peter Elsworth,&nbsp;Matthew Gentle,&nbsp;Malcolm Kennedy,&nbsp;Tony Pople,&nbsp;Joe Scanlan,&nbsp;James Speed,&nbsp;Olusegun O. Osunkoya\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emr.12563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Invasive organisms are key drivers of environmental change globally. Both native and non-native species can become pests that require management or control. Vertebrate pest animals may cause a range of economic, environmental and social impacts for which various plans are developed at a local, state and national scale to aid their management. There are multiple vertebrate pest species in Australia which vary in the type and severity of their negative effects. Prioritisation of these pests and their impacts is critical for management to be cost-effective. We accessed pest management plans (PMPs) from 66 (of 71) local government areas (LGAs) across the state of Queensland to collate a list of vertebrate pest species present in each LGA. Local government areas were then grouped into easily identifiable regions (Regional Organisation of Councils, ‘ROC’ regions, 10 in all) and vertebrate pest species lists were collated for each region. At regional workshops, each pest species was ranked as no, low, medium or high priority by stakeholders. Rankings were used to develop impact scores resulting in a priority list of vertebrate pest animal species at the state level. Fifty-three species were identified in individual LGA PMPs of which 25 were considered priorities at the regional level. Most species prioritised at the state level were mammals, with Wild Dogs (including Dingoes; <i>Canis familiaris</i>), Feral Pigs (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) and Feral Cats (<i>Felis catus</i>) being the three highest ranked. Similarities in priority species were evident across ROC regions, however, several regions prioritised pests specific to their location. The data supported a further amalgamation of the 10 ROC regions into five main groups based on the set of vertebrate pest species that were present. Prioritisation lists should be regularly updated as technologies develop, established pest animal impacts change and new species incursions occur.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"209-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12563\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12563\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入侵生物是全球环境变化的关键驱动因素。本地和非本地物种都可能成为需要管理或控制的害虫。脊椎动物有害动物可能造成一系列的经济、环境和社会影响,因此在地方、州和国家范围内制定了各种计划来帮助它们的管理。澳大利亚有多种脊椎动物害虫,其负面影响的类型和严重程度各不相同。优先处理这些有害生物及其影响对于具有成本效益的管理至关重要。我们查阅了昆士兰州66个(71个)地方政府区域(LGA)的有害生物管理计划(pmp),整理了每个LGA中存在的脊椎动物有害生物物种清单。然后将地方政府区域划分为易于识别的区域(区域理事会组织,“ROC”区域,总共10个),并为每个区域整理脊椎动物害虫物种清单。在区域讲习班上,利益攸关方将每种有害生物列为无、低、中或高优先级。排名用于制定影响评分,从而在州一级产生脊椎动物有害动物物种的优先列表。在个别LGA PMPs中确定了53种,其中25种被认为是区域一级的优先事项。州一级优先保护的大多数物种是哺乳动物,野狗(包括澳洲野狗;家犬(Canis familiaris)、野猪(Sus scrofa)和野猫(Felis catus)是排名最高的三种。然而,在ROC区域中,优先物种的相似性是明显的,一些区域优先考虑特定于其位置的害虫。数据支持基于存在的脊椎动物害虫物种集将10个ROC区域进一步合并为5个主要组。随着技术的发展、已确定的有害动物影响的变化和新物种入侵的发生,应定期更新优先清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

State-wide prioritisation of vertebrate pest animals in Queensland, Australia

State-wide prioritisation of vertebrate pest animals in Queensland, Australia

Invasive organisms are key drivers of environmental change globally. Both native and non-native species can become pests that require management or control. Vertebrate pest animals may cause a range of economic, environmental and social impacts for which various plans are developed at a local, state and national scale to aid their management. There are multiple vertebrate pest species in Australia which vary in the type and severity of their negative effects. Prioritisation of these pests and their impacts is critical for management to be cost-effective. We accessed pest management plans (PMPs) from 66 (of 71) local government areas (LGAs) across the state of Queensland to collate a list of vertebrate pest species present in each LGA. Local government areas were then grouped into easily identifiable regions (Regional Organisation of Councils, ‘ROC’ regions, 10 in all) and vertebrate pest species lists were collated for each region. At regional workshops, each pest species was ranked as no, low, medium or high priority by stakeholders. Rankings were used to develop impact scores resulting in a priority list of vertebrate pest animal species at the state level. Fifty-three species were identified in individual LGA PMPs of which 25 were considered priorities at the regional level. Most species prioritised at the state level were mammals, with Wild Dogs (including Dingoes; Canis familiaris), Feral Pigs (Sus scrofa) and Feral Cats (Felis catus) being the three highest ranked. Similarities in priority species were evident across ROC regions, however, several regions prioritised pests specific to their location. The data supported a further amalgamation of the 10 ROC regions into five main groups based on the set of vertebrate pest species that were present. Prioritisation lists should be regularly updated as technologies develop, established pest animal impacts change and new species incursions occur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信