检察官在中国辩诉交易中的主导作用

Chenkai Wu
{"title":"检察官在中国辩诉交易中的主导作用","authors":"Chenkai Wu","doi":"10.20849/ajsss.v7i4.1093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The leniency system for plea bargaining in China is a plea bargaining system similar to plea bargaining in the United States. With the substantial increase in the application rate of the leniency system for plea guilty and accepting punishment, the criminal policy of \"fewer arrests, careful prosecution and prudence\" has become its due meaning. In China, the functions of censorship, arrest and prosecution are exercised by prosecutors. The burden of powers and responsibilities of prosecutors allows prosecutors to have procedural decision-making power and substantive disposition power in the plea bargaining process, that is, the procuratorial dominance. In the context of fewer arrests, prudent prosecution and prudent detention, prosecutors have greater discretion over arrest and prosecution during the plea negotiation process, coupled with the high adoption rate of sentencing suggestions in practice, the expansion of prosecutors’ substantive disposition powers, and the procuratorial dominance further highlighted. However, we must clarify the relationship between procuratorial power and sentencing power, clarify the status and responsibilities of prosecutors, and further improve the leading role of prosecutors.","PeriodicalId":388036,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Science Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Leading Role of the Procurator in China's Plea Bargaining Process\",\"authors\":\"Chenkai Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.20849/ajsss.v7i4.1093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The leniency system for plea bargaining in China is a plea bargaining system similar to plea bargaining in the United States. With the substantial increase in the application rate of the leniency system for plea guilty and accepting punishment, the criminal policy of \\\"fewer arrests, careful prosecution and prudence\\\" has become its due meaning. In China, the functions of censorship, arrest and prosecution are exercised by prosecutors. The burden of powers and responsibilities of prosecutors allows prosecutors to have procedural decision-making power and substantive disposition power in the plea bargaining process, that is, the procuratorial dominance. In the context of fewer arrests, prudent prosecution and prudent detention, prosecutors have greater discretion over arrest and prosecution during the plea negotiation process, coupled with the high adoption rate of sentencing suggestions in practice, the expansion of prosecutors’ substantive disposition powers, and the procuratorial dominance further highlighted. However, we must clarify the relationship between procuratorial power and sentencing power, clarify the status and responsibilities of prosecutors, and further improve the leading role of prosecutors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Social Science Studies\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Social Science Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v7i4.1093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Science Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v7i4.1093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国辩诉交易的宽大处理制度是一种类似于美国辩诉交易的辩诉交易制度。随着认罪受罚宽大制度适用率的大幅提高,“少抓、慎检、慎判”的刑事政策已成为其应有的意义。在中国,检察机关行使审查、逮捕和起诉的职能。检察官的权责负担使得检察官在辩诉交易过程中具有程序性决策权和实体性处置权,即检察权。在少逮捕、慎起诉、慎拘留的背景下,检察官在认罪协商过程中拥有更大的逮捕和起诉自由裁量权,加上量刑建议在实践中的高采用率,检察官的实质处罚权扩大,检察主导地位进一步凸显。但必须厘清检察权与量刑权的关系,明确检察官的地位和职责,进一步提高检察官的主导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Leading Role of the Procurator in China's Plea Bargaining Process
The leniency system for plea bargaining in China is a plea bargaining system similar to plea bargaining in the United States. With the substantial increase in the application rate of the leniency system for plea guilty and accepting punishment, the criminal policy of "fewer arrests, careful prosecution and prudence" has become its due meaning. In China, the functions of censorship, arrest and prosecution are exercised by prosecutors. The burden of powers and responsibilities of prosecutors allows prosecutors to have procedural decision-making power and substantive disposition power in the plea bargaining process, that is, the procuratorial dominance. In the context of fewer arrests, prudent prosecution and prudent detention, prosecutors have greater discretion over arrest and prosecution during the plea negotiation process, coupled with the high adoption rate of sentencing suggestions in practice, the expansion of prosecutors’ substantive disposition powers, and the procuratorial dominance further highlighted. However, we must clarify the relationship between procuratorial power and sentencing power, clarify the status and responsibilities of prosecutors, and further improve the leading role of prosecutors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信