NEO dBFT协议的形式化安全性分析

Qin Wang, Rujia Li, Shiping Chen, Yang Xiang
{"title":"NEO dBFT协议的形式化安全性分析","authors":"Qin Wang, Rujia Li, Shiping Chen, Yang Xiang","doi":"10.1145/3568314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n NEO is one of the top public chains worldwide. It adopts a new consensus algorithm called\n delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance\n (dBFT). In this paper, we formalize dBFT via the state machine replication model and point out its potential issues. Our theoretical analysis indicates that dBFT could guarantee neither\n liveness\n nor\n safety\n , even if the number of Byzantine nodes is no more than the threshold, which has contradicted the established security claim. Then, we identify two attacks and successfully simulate them. Finally, we provide recommendations. Notably, NEO official team has accepted our suggested fixes.\n","PeriodicalId":377055,"journal":{"name":"Distributed Ledger Technol. Res. Pract.","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Security Analysis on dBFT Protocol of NEO\",\"authors\":\"Qin Wang, Rujia Li, Shiping Chen, Yang Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3568314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n NEO is one of the top public chains worldwide. It adopts a new consensus algorithm called\\n delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance\\n (dBFT). In this paper, we formalize dBFT via the state machine replication model and point out its potential issues. Our theoretical analysis indicates that dBFT could guarantee neither\\n liveness\\n nor\\n safety\\n , even if the number of Byzantine nodes is no more than the threshold, which has contradicted the established security claim. Then, we identify two attacks and successfully simulate them. Finally, we provide recommendations. Notably, NEO official team has accepted our suggested fixes.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":377055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Distributed Ledger Technol. Res. Pract.\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Distributed Ledger Technol. Res. Pract.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3568314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distributed Ledger Technol. Res. Pract.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3568314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

NEO是全球顶级公有链之一。它采用了一种新的共识算法,称为委托拜占庭容错(dBFT)。在本文中,我们通过状态机复制模型形式化dBFT,并指出其潜在的问题。我们的理论分析表明,即使拜占庭节点的数量不超过阈值,dBFT也不能保证活动性和安全性,这与既定的安全性主张相矛盾。然后,我们识别了两种攻击并成功地进行了模拟。最后,我们提供建议。值得注意的是,NEO官方团队已经接受了我们建议的修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formal Security Analysis on dBFT Protocol of NEO
NEO is one of the top public chains worldwide. It adopts a new consensus algorithm called delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT). In this paper, we formalize dBFT via the state machine replication model and point out its potential issues. Our theoretical analysis indicates that dBFT could guarantee neither liveness nor safety , even if the number of Byzantine nodes is no more than the threshold, which has contradicted the established security claim. Then, we identify two attacks and successfully simulate them. Finally, we provide recommendations. Notably, NEO official team has accepted our suggested fixes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信