J. Kropiwnicki
{"title":"Czy Polska powinna pomóc Grecji? Relacja z debaty polityczno-ekonomicznej 2010-2012","authors":"J. Kropiwnicki","doi":"10.18778/1899-2226.18.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This question raised emotions in Poland in 2010-2012. They began with the statement by the Prime Minister in March 2010 that Poland was ready to participate in a program of assistance to Greece. It evoked very strong reactions – not only in debates in conferences halls and in professional journals, but also in the tabloids and on TV and the radio. It was not only politicians and academic experts in economics who took part in those debates, but also the editors of the popular newspapers. The arguments “for” and “against” of different character were raised. Those “for” advocated on the grounds of the principle of solidarity, but also on the grounds of the principle of subsidiarity – arguing that the burden of the problem is beyond the possibilities of Greece to solve herself. They also raised the necessity to defend the endangered common good – the European Union, and argued that prudence advises earning reciprocation in case Poland meets problems in the future. Those “against” pointed out that it was immoral to expect that a much poorer society was expected to assist one that was better off. Another point raised in the debate was that it was the Greeks themselves, both the political elites and the society as such, who were guilty of creating Greece’s problems. The main problem was the institutions of the welfare state, developed beyond the capacities of the country. But there were also some more shocking reasons of the Greek economic problems – and among them massive tax-avoidance, unauthorized social benefits payments, and transfers of incomes to foreign bank accounts. There was also the manipulation of statistical data or even their falsification, by (or with the approval of) the government. Some participants in the debate raised the problem Greek frauds and social dysfunctions being very well known to the EU authorities, the partners of Greece in EMU and by the German and French commercial banks. So – following from the above – Poland should not participate in any programs of assistance to Greece, and the burden of the problem should rest on those who had been responsible for it or who had tolerated its growth because of expected profits. In other words: Greek society, its political elites and the banks and those countries that had tolerated the developments. The debate ended in Poland when the member-states of the EMU decided that they would take decisions concerning Greece within their own group. And it was decided that “troika” – representatives of the European Commission, ECB and IMF – would decide on the size of the assistance and of the conditions. Poland, as a member of the IMF, does in fact participate in the costs of the assistance programs, but this fact does not evoke great emotions.","PeriodicalId":349893,"journal":{"name":"Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.18.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2010年至2012年,这个问题在波兰引发了情绪波动。首先是波兰总理在2010年3月发表的声明,称波兰准备参加对希腊的援助计划。它引起了非常强烈的反应- -不仅在会议厅和专业期刊的辩论中,而且在小报、电视和广播中。参加辩论的不仅有政治家和经济学专家,还有大众报纸的编辑。提出了不同性质的“赞成”和“反对”的论点。那些“支持”的人在团结原则的基础上提倡,但也在辅助原则的基础上提倡——他们认为,这个问题的负担超出了希腊自己解决的可能性。他们还提出了捍卫岌岌可危的共同利益——欧盟的必要性,并辩称,如果波兰未来遇到问题,谨慎的做法是获得回报。“反对者”指出,指望一个贫穷得多的社会去帮助一个富裕得多的社会是不道德的。辩论中提出的另一个观点是,希腊人自己,无论是政治精英还是社会本身,都应为希腊的问题负责。主要问题是福利国家的制度,发展得超出了国家的能力。但希腊经济问题还有一些更令人震惊的原因——其中包括大规模避税、未经授权的社会福利支付以及将收入转移到外国银行账户。此外,政府(或在政府的批准下)操纵统计数据,甚至伪造数据。一些参加辩论的人提出,希腊的欺诈行为和社会功能失调问题已为欧盟当局、希腊在欧洲货币联盟的合作伙伴以及德国和法国的商业银行所熟知。因此,根据上面的结论,波兰不应该参与任何援助希腊的计划,问题的负担应该落在那些对这个问题负责的人身上,或者那些因为预期利润而容忍希腊增长的人身上。换句话说:希腊社会、它的政治精英、银行以及那些容忍事态发展的国家。这场辩论在波兰结束,当时欧洲货币联盟成员国决定,他们将在自己的集团内就希腊问题做出决定。会议决定,“三驾马车”——欧盟委员会(European Commission)、欧洲央行(ECB)和国际货币基金组织(IMF)的代表——将决定援助的规模和条件。波兰作为国际货币基金组织的成员,实际上确实参与了援助计划的费用,但这一事实并没有引起很大的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Czy Polska powinna pomóc Grecji? Relacja z debaty polityczno-ekonomicznej 2010-2012
This question raised emotions in Poland in 2010-2012. They began with the statement by the Prime Minister in March 2010 that Poland was ready to participate in a program of assistance to Greece. It evoked very strong reactions – not only in debates in conferences halls and in professional journals, but also in the tabloids and on TV and the radio. It was not only politicians and academic experts in economics who took part in those debates, but also the editors of the popular newspapers. The arguments “for” and “against” of different character were raised. Those “for” advocated on the grounds of the principle of solidarity, but also on the grounds of the principle of subsidiarity – arguing that the burden of the problem is beyond the possibilities of Greece to solve herself. They also raised the necessity to defend the endangered common good – the European Union, and argued that prudence advises earning reciprocation in case Poland meets problems in the future. Those “against” pointed out that it was immoral to expect that a much poorer society was expected to assist one that was better off. Another point raised in the debate was that it was the Greeks themselves, both the political elites and the society as such, who were guilty of creating Greece’s problems. The main problem was the institutions of the welfare state, developed beyond the capacities of the country. But there were also some more shocking reasons of the Greek economic problems – and among them massive tax-avoidance, unauthorized social benefits payments, and transfers of incomes to foreign bank accounts. There was also the manipulation of statistical data or even their falsification, by (or with the approval of) the government. Some participants in the debate raised the problem Greek frauds and social dysfunctions being very well known to the EU authorities, the partners of Greece in EMU and by the German and French commercial banks. So – following from the above – Poland should not participate in any programs of assistance to Greece, and the burden of the problem should rest on those who had been responsible for it or who had tolerated its growth because of expected profits. In other words: Greek society, its political elites and the banks and those countries that had tolerated the developments. The debate ended in Poland when the member-states of the EMU decided that they would take decisions concerning Greece within their own group. And it was decided that “troika” – representatives of the European Commission, ECB and IMF – would decide on the size of the assistance and of the conditions. Poland, as a member of the IMF, does in fact participate in the costs of the assistance programs, but this fact does not evoke great emotions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信