采访:2011年11月30日,亚利桑那州梅萨市梅萨社区学院

W. Kincaid
{"title":"采访:2011年11月30日,亚利桑那州梅萨市梅萨社区学院","authors":"W. Kincaid","doi":"10.5749/WICAZOSAREVIEW.29.1.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"means: It started out with, as I mentioned in my talk, the five acts of genocide as defined by the international community.1 The United States literally and figuratively holds us as prisoners. What no one realizes is that federally recognized reservations are considered prisoner of war camps, and that is a fact. In order for the trust status2 to continue, the United States has to legally take the position that a condition of war exists with Indians. The only time when the war ceases is when we leave the confines of the prisoner of war camp. That’s why the Constitution of the United States of America does not apply to Indian people on a federally recognized reservation or on federal trust land. We have no protections, zero protections, and tribal governments are the wardens and gatekeepers. These governments are not charged by the U.S. Constitution to rule, but by a congressional mandate, guided by Supreme Court decisions, to do so. On reservations, we have no protections against illegal search and seizure or any U.S. constitutional rights whatsoever. We have tribal constitutions that mean nothing in law. You cannot take that tribal constitution to a federal court and have it ruled on whether it has been delegated to the tribal government by the U.S. government. I found out through my own cases that federal courts have two avenues of law. One is that Indians are a political entity Russell Means Interview November 30, 2011, Mesa Community College, Mesa, arizona","PeriodicalId":343767,"journal":{"name":"Wicazo Sa Review","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russell Means Interview: November 30, 2011, Mesa Community College, Mesa, Arizona\",\"authors\":\"W. Kincaid\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/WICAZOSAREVIEW.29.1.0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"means: It started out with, as I mentioned in my talk, the five acts of genocide as defined by the international community.1 The United States literally and figuratively holds us as prisoners. What no one realizes is that federally recognized reservations are considered prisoner of war camps, and that is a fact. In order for the trust status2 to continue, the United States has to legally take the position that a condition of war exists with Indians. The only time when the war ceases is when we leave the confines of the prisoner of war camp. That’s why the Constitution of the United States of America does not apply to Indian people on a federally recognized reservation or on federal trust land. We have no protections, zero protections, and tribal governments are the wardens and gatekeepers. These governments are not charged by the U.S. Constitution to rule, but by a congressional mandate, guided by Supreme Court decisions, to do so. On reservations, we have no protections against illegal search and seizure or any U.S. constitutional rights whatsoever. We have tribal constitutions that mean nothing in law. You cannot take that tribal constitution to a federal court and have it ruled on whether it has been delegated to the tribal government by the U.S. government. I found out through my own cases that federal courts have two avenues of law. One is that Indians are a political entity Russell Means Interview November 30, 2011, Mesa Community College, Mesa, arizona\",\"PeriodicalId\":343767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wicazo Sa Review\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wicazo Sa Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/WICAZOSAREVIEW.29.1.0047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wicazo Sa Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/WICAZOSAREVIEW.29.1.0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如我在讲话中提到的,它始于国际社会界定的五种种族灭绝行为美国从字面上和比喻上都把我们当作囚犯。没有人意识到的是,联邦政府承认的保留地被视为战俘营,这是事实。为了使托管状态继续下去,美国必须在法律上采取与印第安人处于战争状态的立场。只有当我们离开战俘营的时候,战争才会停止。这就是为什么《美利坚合众国宪法》不适用于联邦承认的保留地或联邦托管土地上的印第安人。我们没有任何保护,没有任何保护,部落政府是看守和看门人。这些政府不受美国宪法的管辖,而是由国会授权,在最高法院裁决的指导下进行。在保留地,我们不受非法搜查和扣押的保护,也没有任何美国宪法赋予我们的权利。我们的部落宪法在法律上毫无意义。你不能把部落宪法提交到联邦法院,让它裁决它是否被美国政府授权给部落政府。我从自己的案件中发现,联邦法院有两种法律途径。其中之一是,印第安人是一个政治实体。(Russell Means)采访2011年11月30日,亚利桑那州梅萨市梅萨社区学院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Russell Means Interview: November 30, 2011, Mesa Community College, Mesa, Arizona
means: It started out with, as I mentioned in my talk, the five acts of genocide as defined by the international community.1 The United States literally and figuratively holds us as prisoners. What no one realizes is that federally recognized reservations are considered prisoner of war camps, and that is a fact. In order for the trust status2 to continue, the United States has to legally take the position that a condition of war exists with Indians. The only time when the war ceases is when we leave the confines of the prisoner of war camp. That’s why the Constitution of the United States of America does not apply to Indian people on a federally recognized reservation or on federal trust land. We have no protections, zero protections, and tribal governments are the wardens and gatekeepers. These governments are not charged by the U.S. Constitution to rule, but by a congressional mandate, guided by Supreme Court decisions, to do so. On reservations, we have no protections against illegal search and seizure or any U.S. constitutional rights whatsoever. We have tribal constitutions that mean nothing in law. You cannot take that tribal constitution to a federal court and have it ruled on whether it has been delegated to the tribal government by the U.S. government. I found out through my own cases that federal courts have two avenues of law. One is that Indians are a political entity Russell Means Interview November 30, 2011, Mesa Community College, Mesa, arizona
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信