一颗小卫星的失败和一项太空科学任务的失败

R. Katz
{"title":"一颗小卫星的失败和一项太空科学任务的失败","authors":"R. Katz","doi":"10.1109/EH.2002.1029856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. On March 4, 1999, the Wide-Field Infrared Explorer (WIRE) was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base on a Pegasus XL launch vehicle into a 540 km orbit with a planned mission duration of four months. WIRE was designed to conduct a deep infrared, extra galactic science survey 500 times more sensitive than the Infrared Astronomy Satellite (IRAS) Faint Source Catalog. The instrument consists of, a cryogenically cooled, 30-centimeter telescope and all associated electronics designed to detect faint astronomical sources in two infrared wavelength bands. The WIRE launch was nominal. Shortly after launch, ground commands were transmitted to perform a planned secondary venting of the secondary hydrogen tank. The next pass showed that the spacecraft was tumbling at increasing rate, ultimately spinning up to 60 rpm. Within 36 hours of launch, the instrument's 4-month supply of cryogen was completely exhausted. The WIRE>scientific mission was declared lost on March 8,1999. The root cause of the WIRE mission loss is a digital logic design error in the instrument pyro electronics box, which inadvertently caused the cover to be ejected. The transient performance of components was not adequately considered in the box design resulting in the inadvertent pyrotechnic device firing during the initial pyro electronics box power-up. The results from the investigation into the failure mechanism will be discussed; that is, how did the mission fail. An equally important question is why did the mission fail. Spacecraft systems go through a variety of analyses, simulations, tests, and reviews. These will be discussed showing why the error resulted in a mishap on-orbit. A review of launcher and spacecraft performance and failures in the Industry over the last decade will be reviewed. Trends will be presented and discussed.","PeriodicalId":322028,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2002 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The failure of a small satellite and the loss of a space science mission\",\"authors\":\"R. Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EH.2002.1029856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. On March 4, 1999, the Wide-Field Infrared Explorer (WIRE) was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base on a Pegasus XL launch vehicle into a 540 km orbit with a planned mission duration of four months. WIRE was designed to conduct a deep infrared, extra galactic science survey 500 times more sensitive than the Infrared Astronomy Satellite (IRAS) Faint Source Catalog. The instrument consists of, a cryogenically cooled, 30-centimeter telescope and all associated electronics designed to detect faint astronomical sources in two infrared wavelength bands. The WIRE launch was nominal. Shortly after launch, ground commands were transmitted to perform a planned secondary venting of the secondary hydrogen tank. The next pass showed that the spacecraft was tumbling at increasing rate, ultimately spinning up to 60 rpm. Within 36 hours of launch, the instrument's 4-month supply of cryogen was completely exhausted. The WIRE>scientific mission was declared lost on March 8,1999. The root cause of the WIRE mission loss is a digital logic design error in the instrument pyro electronics box, which inadvertently caused the cover to be ejected. The transient performance of components was not adequately considered in the box design resulting in the inadvertent pyrotechnic device firing during the initial pyro electronics box power-up. The results from the investigation into the failure mechanism will be discussed; that is, how did the mission fail. An equally important question is why did the mission fail. Spacecraft systems go through a variety of analyses, simulations, tests, and reviews. These will be discussed showing why the error resulted in a mishap on-orbit. A review of launcher and spacecraft performance and failures in the Industry over the last decade will be reviewed. Trends will be presented and discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2002 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2002 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EH.2002.1029856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2002 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EH.2002.1029856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

只提供摘要形式。1999年3月4日,宽视场红外探测器(WIRE)在范登堡空军基地的飞马座XL运载火箭上发射到540公里的轨道上,计划任务持续时间为4个月。WIRE的设计目的是进行一项深红外、银河系外的科学调查,其灵敏度是红外天文卫星(IRAS)微弱源目录的500倍。该仪器由一个低温冷却的30厘米望远镜和所有相关的电子设备组成,旨在探测两个红外波段的微弱天文源。WIRE的发射是象征性的。发射后不久,地面指令被传送到执行计划中的二次氢气罐的二次排气。下一关显示飞船正在以越来越快的速度翻滚,最终旋转速度达到每分钟60转。在发射后的36小时内,该仪器4个月的冷冻剂供应就完全耗尽了。1999年3月8日,WIRE的科学任务宣告失败。WIRE任务损失的根本原因是仪表热电子盒中的数字逻辑设计错误,无意中导致盖子弹出。在箱体设计中没有充分考虑元件的瞬态性能,导致在初始上电过程中,烟火装置意外点火。对破坏机制的研究结果将进行讨论;也就是说,任务是如何失败的。一个同样重要的问题是为什么这次任务失败了。航天器系统要经过各种各样的分析、模拟、测试和评审。这些将被讨论,以说明为什么错误会导致轨道上的事故。对过去十年发射装置和航天器的性能和故障进行审查。会议将介绍和讨论各种趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The failure of a small satellite and the loss of a space science mission
Summary form only given. On March 4, 1999, the Wide-Field Infrared Explorer (WIRE) was launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base on a Pegasus XL launch vehicle into a 540 km orbit with a planned mission duration of four months. WIRE was designed to conduct a deep infrared, extra galactic science survey 500 times more sensitive than the Infrared Astronomy Satellite (IRAS) Faint Source Catalog. The instrument consists of, a cryogenically cooled, 30-centimeter telescope and all associated electronics designed to detect faint astronomical sources in two infrared wavelength bands. The WIRE launch was nominal. Shortly after launch, ground commands were transmitted to perform a planned secondary venting of the secondary hydrogen tank. The next pass showed that the spacecraft was tumbling at increasing rate, ultimately spinning up to 60 rpm. Within 36 hours of launch, the instrument's 4-month supply of cryogen was completely exhausted. The WIRE>scientific mission was declared lost on March 8,1999. The root cause of the WIRE mission loss is a digital logic design error in the instrument pyro electronics box, which inadvertently caused the cover to be ejected. The transient performance of components was not adequately considered in the box design resulting in the inadvertent pyrotechnic device firing during the initial pyro electronics box power-up. The results from the investigation into the failure mechanism will be discussed; that is, how did the mission fail. An equally important question is why did the mission fail. Spacecraft systems go through a variety of analyses, simulations, tests, and reviews. These will be discussed showing why the error resulted in a mishap on-orbit. A review of launcher and spacecraft performance and failures in the Industry over the last decade will be reviewed. Trends will be presented and discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信