欧洲法院对非共同体航空承运人的管辖权及欧盟法的域外适用研究——以Q, R, S诉美国联合航空公司案为例[2022]C‑561/20

J. Sur
{"title":"欧洲法院对非共同体航空承运人的管辖权及欧盟法的域外适用研究——以Q, R, S诉美国联合航空公司案为例[2022]C‑561/20","authors":"J. Sur","doi":"10.18104/kaic.2022.37.3.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : This paper analyzed the jurisdiction over a non-Community air carrier of the CJEU and the extraterritorial application of EU Regulation in the Q, R, S v. United Airlines Inc. [2022] Case C‑561/20. Research design, data and methodology : This study examined the scopes, applications, and requirements of the extraterritorial application in the EU Regulation. It also evaluated issues related to the United Airlines case by examining the EU Regulations and practical views. Results : The CJEU ruled that a flight with one or more connections that were the subject of a single reservation constitutes a whole for the purposes of the right of passengers to compensation provided for by EU Regulations. The applicability of the Regulation was to be assessed with regard to the place of the flight’s initial departure and the place of the final destination of that flight. Conclusions : This study analyzed the legal and practical issues regarding the United Airlines case by examining the EU Regulations and theories of CJEU. It also criticizes the views of the CJEU on United Airlines.","PeriodicalId":368687,"journal":{"name":"Korean Academy Of International Commerce","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on the Jurisdiction Over a Non-Community Air Carrier of the CJEU and the Extraterritorial Application of EU Law: Focused on Q, R, S v. United Airlines Inc. [2022] Case C‑561/20\",\"authors\":\"J. Sur\",\"doi\":\"10.18104/kaic.2022.37.3.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose : This paper analyzed the jurisdiction over a non-Community air carrier of the CJEU and the extraterritorial application of EU Regulation in the Q, R, S v. United Airlines Inc. [2022] Case C‑561/20. Research design, data and methodology : This study examined the scopes, applications, and requirements of the extraterritorial application in the EU Regulation. It also evaluated issues related to the United Airlines case by examining the EU Regulations and practical views. Results : The CJEU ruled that a flight with one or more connections that were the subject of a single reservation constitutes a whole for the purposes of the right of passengers to compensation provided for by EU Regulations. The applicability of the Regulation was to be assessed with regard to the place of the flight’s initial departure and the place of the final destination of that flight. Conclusions : This study analyzed the legal and practical issues regarding the United Airlines case by examining the EU Regulations and theories of CJEU. It also criticizes the views of the CJEU on United Airlines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Academy Of International Commerce\",\"volume\":\"191 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Academy Of International Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.2022.37.3.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Academy Of International Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18104/kaic.2022.37.3.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文在Q, R, S诉美国联合航空公司[2022]案C‑561/20中分析了欧洲法院对非欧共体航空承运人的管辖权以及欧盟法规的域外适用。研究设计、数据和方法:本研究考察了欧盟法规中域外适用的范围、应用和要求。它还通过审查欧盟条例和实际观点来评估与联合航空公司案件有关的问题。结果:欧洲法院裁定,以单一预订为主题的一个或多个转机的航班构成了欧盟法规规定的乘客获得赔偿权利的整体。《条例》的适用性将根据该航班最初出发的地点和该航班最终目的地的地点进行评估。结论:本研究通过考察欧盟法规和欧洲法院的理论,分析了美联航案的法律和实践问题。它还批评了法院对联合航空公司的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on the Jurisdiction Over a Non-Community Air Carrier of the CJEU and the Extraterritorial Application of EU Law: Focused on Q, R, S v. United Airlines Inc. [2022] Case C‑561/20
Purpose : This paper analyzed the jurisdiction over a non-Community air carrier of the CJEU and the extraterritorial application of EU Regulation in the Q, R, S v. United Airlines Inc. [2022] Case C‑561/20. Research design, data and methodology : This study examined the scopes, applications, and requirements of the extraterritorial application in the EU Regulation. It also evaluated issues related to the United Airlines case by examining the EU Regulations and practical views. Results : The CJEU ruled that a flight with one or more connections that were the subject of a single reservation constitutes a whole for the purposes of the right of passengers to compensation provided for by EU Regulations. The applicability of the Regulation was to be assessed with regard to the place of the flight’s initial departure and the place of the final destination of that flight. Conclusions : This study analyzed the legal and practical issues regarding the United Airlines case by examining the EU Regulations and theories of CJEU. It also criticizes the views of the CJEU on United Airlines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信