{"title":"2016年第13届政府审查了由PT NINDYA (PERSERO)领导的有关腐败行为的企业侵权行为","authors":"Indira Rawiyakhirty","doi":"10.25170/paradigma.v7i1.3140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporations as legal entities or subjects can give a major contribution in increasing economic growth and national development, but there are times when corporations commit various criminal acts (corporate crime) that have a detrimental impact on the state and society. In reality, corporations can be a place to hide assets resulting from criminal acts that are not touched by the legal process in criminal liability. The problem of corporate responsibility as a perpetrator of a crime is not a simple matter, considering that a corporation is a legal entity, not a person who can be subject to imprisonment. In addition, the problem also stems from the principle of no crime without error (geen straf zonder schold). Mistakes are known as mens rea or bad intentions that naturally only exist in natural people. \n \nMens rea is an element that is difficult to prove from a corporation that is considered to have committed a crime, considering that corporations can only take action through the organ of board of directors. Corporations can be considered to have committed a crime based on the actions of the person who supervises the management of the corporation. On December 21, 2016, the Supreme Court stipulates Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Corporations (Perma No. 13 of 2016). The existence of Perma Number 13 of 2016 has become the basis for law enforcement to be more confident in taking action against corporations that commit criminal acts. This study aims to find out how criminal responsibility can be charged to PT Nindya Karya (Persero) as a perpetrator of corruption and how to apply Perma Number 13 of 2016 in handling corruption cases committed by PT Nindya Karya (Persero). \n \nThe method used is normative research. The criminal liability that can be imposed on PT Nindya Karya (Persero) is the principal crime in the form of a fine with a maximum provision plus 1/3 (one third). The determination of PT Nindya Karya (Persero) as a suspect in a criminal act of corruption is a concrete step in law enforcement in Indonesia in ensnaring corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts. This determination is a breakthrough in law enforcement, especially for the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) after the issuance of Perma No. 13/2016 which can be used as a guide in the implementation of handling corporate crimes.","PeriodicalId":445925,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI TERKAIT PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH PT NINDYA KARYA (PERSERO) DITINJAU DARI PERMA NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016\",\"authors\":\"Indira Rawiyakhirty\",\"doi\":\"10.25170/paradigma.v7i1.3140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corporations as legal entities or subjects can give a major contribution in increasing economic growth and national development, but there are times when corporations commit various criminal acts (corporate crime) that have a detrimental impact on the state and society. In reality, corporations can be a place to hide assets resulting from criminal acts that are not touched by the legal process in criminal liability. The problem of corporate responsibility as a perpetrator of a crime is not a simple matter, considering that a corporation is a legal entity, not a person who can be subject to imprisonment. In addition, the problem also stems from the principle of no crime without error (geen straf zonder schold). Mistakes are known as mens rea or bad intentions that naturally only exist in natural people. \\n \\nMens rea is an element that is difficult to prove from a corporation that is considered to have committed a crime, considering that corporations can only take action through the organ of board of directors. Corporations can be considered to have committed a crime based on the actions of the person who supervises the management of the corporation. On December 21, 2016, the Supreme Court stipulates Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Corporations (Perma No. 13 of 2016). The existence of Perma Number 13 of 2016 has become the basis for law enforcement to be more confident in taking action against corporations that commit criminal acts. This study aims to find out how criminal responsibility can be charged to PT Nindya Karya (Persero) as a perpetrator of corruption and how to apply Perma Number 13 of 2016 in handling corruption cases committed by PT Nindya Karya (Persero). \\n \\nThe method used is normative research. The criminal liability that can be imposed on PT Nindya Karya (Persero) is the principal crime in the form of a fine with a maximum provision plus 1/3 (one third). The determination of PT Nindya Karya (Persero) as a suspect in a criminal act of corruption is a concrete step in law enforcement in Indonesia in ensnaring corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts. This determination is a breakthrough in law enforcement, especially for the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) after the issuance of Perma No. 13/2016 which can be used as a guide in the implementation of handling corporate crimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i1.3140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i1.3140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
公司作为法人实体或主体可以为促进经济增长和国家发展做出重大贡献,但有时公司会犯下对国家和社会产生有害影响的各种犯罪行为(公司犯罪)。在现实中,公司可能是隐藏犯罪行为所产生的资产的地方,而这些资产在刑事责任中不受法律程序的影响。考虑到公司是一个法律实体,而不是一个可以被监禁的人,作为犯罪行为人的公司责任问题不是一个简单的问题。此外,该问题还源于无过失不犯罪的原则(绿色地带学派)。错误被称为恶意或不良意图,自然只存在于正常人身上。由于法人只能通过董事会机关采取行动,因此很难从被认定为犯罪的法人身上证明犯罪意图。根据监督公司管理人员的行为,公司可以被视为犯罪。2016年12月21日,大法院制定了2016年第13号《关于法人处理刑事案件程序的大法院条例》(2016年第13号法令)。2016年第13号法律的存在已经成为执法部门更有信心对犯罪企业采取行动的基础。本研究旨在找出如何对PT Nindya Karya (Persero)作为腐败行为人提起刑事责任,以及如何在处理PT Nindya Karya (Persero)犯下的腐败案件中应用2016年第13号Perma。使用的方法是规范研究。可以对PT Nindya Karya (Persero)施加的刑事责任是主要犯罪,其形式是罚款,最高规定加上三分之一(三分之一)。将PT Nindya Karya (Persero)确定为腐败犯罪行为的嫌疑人,是印度尼西亚执法部门在将企业作为犯罪行为的肇事者绳之以法方面迈出的具体一步。这一决定是执法上的突破,特别是对于肃贪委员会(KPK)在发布第13/2016号Perma No. 13/2016之后,可以作为执行处理公司犯罪的指南。
PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI TERKAIT PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH PT NINDYA KARYA (PERSERO) DITINJAU DARI PERMA NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016
Corporations as legal entities or subjects can give a major contribution in increasing economic growth and national development, but there are times when corporations commit various criminal acts (corporate crime) that have a detrimental impact on the state and society. In reality, corporations can be a place to hide assets resulting from criminal acts that are not touched by the legal process in criminal liability. The problem of corporate responsibility as a perpetrator of a crime is not a simple matter, considering that a corporation is a legal entity, not a person who can be subject to imprisonment. In addition, the problem also stems from the principle of no crime without error (geen straf zonder schold). Mistakes are known as mens rea or bad intentions that naturally only exist in natural people.
Mens rea is an element that is difficult to prove from a corporation that is considered to have committed a crime, considering that corporations can only take action through the organ of board of directors. Corporations can be considered to have committed a crime based on the actions of the person who supervises the management of the corporation. On December 21, 2016, the Supreme Court stipulates Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Corporations (Perma No. 13 of 2016). The existence of Perma Number 13 of 2016 has become the basis for law enforcement to be more confident in taking action against corporations that commit criminal acts. This study aims to find out how criminal responsibility can be charged to PT Nindya Karya (Persero) as a perpetrator of corruption and how to apply Perma Number 13 of 2016 in handling corruption cases committed by PT Nindya Karya (Persero).
The method used is normative research. The criminal liability that can be imposed on PT Nindya Karya (Persero) is the principal crime in the form of a fine with a maximum provision plus 1/3 (one third). The determination of PT Nindya Karya (Persero) as a suspect in a criminal act of corruption is a concrete step in law enforcement in Indonesia in ensnaring corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts. This determination is a breakthrough in law enforcement, especially for the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) after the issuance of Perma No. 13/2016 which can be used as a guide in the implementation of handling corporate crimes.