构建安全背包密码系统的格攻击的经验探索

S. Jen, Chia-Yu Lu, Tse-Lin Lai, J. Yang
{"title":"构建安全背包密码系统的格攻击的经验探索","authors":"S. Jen, Chia-Yu Lu, Tse-Lin Lai, J. Yang","doi":"10.1109/ICASID.2012.6325281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pending the possible realization of quantum computers, the RSA algorithm face critical challenges because of weaknesses under quantum cryptanalysis. A possible replacement may be knapsack cryptosystems, which do not yield any weaknesses to quantum computation. At present, the most significant challenge against knapsack cryptosystems is lattice attack, and public key density has historically been used to measure the security of knapsack cryptosystems against it. In this paper, we demonstrate the compromise of an acceptably dense knapsack cryptosystem using lattice attack. In order to quantify the security of knapsack cryptosystems under lattice attacks, we design experiments to analyze possible affecting factors. We demonstrate that it is not appropriate to assess the security of a knapsack cryptosystem by only considering density. Instead, there exist some other factors in literature which have more significance than density. Building on these results, we develop an empirically secure knapsack cryptosystem which explores possible directions for improving knapsack cryptosystems.","PeriodicalId":408223,"journal":{"name":"Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical exploration of lattice attacks for building secure knapsack cryptosystems\",\"authors\":\"S. Jen, Chia-Yu Lu, Tse-Lin Lai, J. Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICASID.2012.6325281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pending the possible realization of quantum computers, the RSA algorithm face critical challenges because of weaknesses under quantum cryptanalysis. A possible replacement may be knapsack cryptosystems, which do not yield any weaknesses to quantum computation. At present, the most significant challenge against knapsack cryptosystems is lattice attack, and public key density has historically been used to measure the security of knapsack cryptosystems against it. In this paper, we demonstrate the compromise of an acceptably dense knapsack cryptosystem using lattice attack. In order to quantify the security of knapsack cryptosystems under lattice attacks, we design experiments to analyze possible affecting factors. We demonstrate that it is not appropriate to assess the security of a knapsack cryptosystem by only considering density. Instead, there exist some other factors in literature which have more significance than density. Building on these results, we develop an empirically secure knapsack cryptosystem which explores possible directions for improving knapsack cryptosystems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASID.2012.6325281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASID.2012.6325281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在量子计算机可能实现之前,由于量子密码分析的弱点,RSA算法面临严峻挑战。一个可能的替代品可能是背包密码系统,它不会对量子计算产生任何弱点。目前,针对背包式密码系统最主要的挑战是格攻击,而公钥密度历来被用来衡量背包式密码系统对格攻击的安全性。在本文中,我们证明了使用格攻击的可接受密集背包密码系统的妥协。为了量化背包密码系统在格子攻击下的安全性,我们设计了实验来分析可能的影响因素。我们证明了仅考虑密度来评估背包密码系统的安全性是不合适的。相反,文学中还有一些比密度更重要的因素。在这些结果的基础上,我们开发了一个经验安全的背包密码系统,探索了改进背包密码系统的可能方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical exploration of lattice attacks for building secure knapsack cryptosystems
Pending the possible realization of quantum computers, the RSA algorithm face critical challenges because of weaknesses under quantum cryptanalysis. A possible replacement may be knapsack cryptosystems, which do not yield any weaknesses to quantum computation. At present, the most significant challenge against knapsack cryptosystems is lattice attack, and public key density has historically been used to measure the security of knapsack cryptosystems against it. In this paper, we demonstrate the compromise of an acceptably dense knapsack cryptosystem using lattice attack. In order to quantify the security of knapsack cryptosystems under lattice attacks, we design experiments to analyze possible affecting factors. We demonstrate that it is not appropriate to assess the security of a knapsack cryptosystem by only considering density. Instead, there exist some other factors in literature which have more significance than density. Building on these results, we develop an empirically secure knapsack cryptosystem which explores possible directions for improving knapsack cryptosystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信