(P.317-323):司法服从还是司法能动:荷兰行政法的探索

Revista Juris Poiesis Pub Date : 2019-08-30 DOI:10.5935/2448-0517.20190033

F. Jansen

{"title":"(P.317-323):司法服从还是司法能动:荷兰行政法的探索","authors":"F. Jansen","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative \nlaw allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the \nexecutive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the \ngeneral principles of good administration.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seção Especial (P.317-323): JUDICIAL DEFERENCE OR JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: An exploration\\n of Dutch Administrative Law\",\"authors\":\"F. Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2448-0517.20190033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative \\nlaw allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the \\nexecutive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the \\ngeneral principles of good administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Juris Poiesis\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Juris Poiesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Juris Poiesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图考察荷兰行政法在多大程度上以及以何种方式允许促进行政部门对事实和法律解释的尊重的机制。特别侧重于两个要素:反对程序和良好管理的一般原则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Seção Especial (P.317-323): JUDICIAL DEFERENCE OR JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: An exploration of Dutch Administrative Law

This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative law allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the executive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the general principles of good administration.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revista Juris Poiesis

自引率

0.00%

发文量