(P.317-323):司法服从还是司法能动:荷兰行政法的探索

F. Jansen
{"title":"(P.317-323):司法服从还是司法能动:荷兰行政法的探索","authors":"F. Jansen","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative \nlaw allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the \nexecutive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the \ngeneral principles of good administration.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seção Especial (P.317-323): JUDICIAL DEFERENCE OR JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: An exploration\\n of Dutch Administrative Law\",\"authors\":\"F. Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2448-0517.20190033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative \\nlaw allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the \\nexecutive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the \\ngeneral principles of good administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Juris Poiesis\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Juris Poiesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Juris Poiesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图考察荷兰行政法在多大程度上以及以何种方式允许促进行政部门对事实和法律解释的尊重的机制。特别侧重于两个要素:反对程序和良好管理的一般原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seção Especial (P.317-323): JUDICIAL DEFERENCE OR JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: An exploration of Dutch Administrative Law
This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative law allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the executive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the general principles of good administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信