{"title":"(P.317-323):司法服从还是司法能动:荷兰行政法的探索","authors":"F. Jansen","doi":"10.5935/2448-0517.20190033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative \nlaw allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the \nexecutive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the \ngeneral principles of good administration.","PeriodicalId":325417,"journal":{"name":"Revista Juris Poiesis","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seção Especial (P.317-323): JUDICIAL DEFERENCE OR JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: An exploration\\n of Dutch Administrative Law\",\"authors\":\"F. Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2448-0517.20190033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative \\nlaw allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the \\nexecutive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the \\ngeneral principles of good administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Juris Poiesis\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Juris Poiesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Juris Poiesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20190033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Seção Especial (P.317-323): JUDICIAL DEFERENCE OR JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: An exploration
of Dutch Administrative Law
This paper seeks to examine to what extent and in which ways the Dutch administrative
law allows for mechanisms that promote deference to the interpretation of facts and law by the
executive branch. A particular focus is placed on two elements: the objection procedure and the
general principles of good administration.