灯和LED安全分类与现实暴露分析

K. Schulmeister, J. O'Hagan, D. Sliney
{"title":"灯和LED安全分类与现实暴露分析","authors":"K. Schulmeister, J. O'Hagan, D. Sliney","doi":"10.2351/1.5118592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international lamp safety standard IEC 62471 “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems” defines criteria to classify lamps into one of four risk groups (exempt, RG1, RG2, RG3). RG3 is referred to as “high risk” and is usually not considered as appropriate as a consumer product unless made safe by the housing (the luminaire or the lamp system). While the exempt group and RG1 is usually accepted as “safe”, there are concerns – particularly for LEDs – if RG2 is appropriate for lighting of rooms or streets, or as consumer products without a warning label. To support a balanced view of the actual risk associated to the use of a product, this paper discusses the rules of how to determine the risk group. Strictly speaking IEC 62471:2006 requires risk group classification only for lamps and not for luminaires or lamp systems. Due to different reasons, the risk group might not reflect the actual risk: small assumed eye movements, wide ranges of permitted exposure durations per risk group as well as safety margins between limits and injury thresholds. For lighting and many other applications, for instance, RG2 when associated with visible light emission can probably be considered as sufficiently safe for consumer products even without warning labels. When UV emission is not an issue, it can be argued that for regular lamps and luminaires, risk group classification does not appear to be necessary. We also argue that it is not justified to consider LEDs differently than other, conventional light sources in a discussion about retinal hazards.The international lamp safety standard IEC 62471 “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems” defines criteria to classify lamps into one of four risk groups (exempt, RG1, RG2, RG3). RG3 is referred to as “high risk” and is usually not considered as appropriate as a consumer product unless made safe by the housing (the luminaire or the lamp system). While the exempt group and RG1 is usually accepted as “safe”, there are concerns – particularly for LEDs – if RG2 is appropriate for lighting of rooms or streets, or as consumer products without a warning label. To support a balanced view of the actual risk associated to the use of a product, this paper discusses the rules of how to determine the risk group. Strictly speaking IEC 62471:2006 requires risk group classification only for lamps and not for luminaires or lamp systems. Due to different reasons, the risk group might not reflect the actual risk: small assumed eye movements, wide ranges of permitted exposure durations per risk group as well as saf...","PeriodicalId":118257,"journal":{"name":"International Laser Safety Conference","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lamp and LED safety – classification vs. realistic exposure analysis\",\"authors\":\"K. Schulmeister, J. O'Hagan, D. Sliney\",\"doi\":\"10.2351/1.5118592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The international lamp safety standard IEC 62471 “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems” defines criteria to classify lamps into one of four risk groups (exempt, RG1, RG2, RG3). RG3 is referred to as “high risk” and is usually not considered as appropriate as a consumer product unless made safe by the housing (the luminaire or the lamp system). While the exempt group and RG1 is usually accepted as “safe”, there are concerns – particularly for LEDs – if RG2 is appropriate for lighting of rooms or streets, or as consumer products without a warning label. To support a balanced view of the actual risk associated to the use of a product, this paper discusses the rules of how to determine the risk group. Strictly speaking IEC 62471:2006 requires risk group classification only for lamps and not for luminaires or lamp systems. Due to different reasons, the risk group might not reflect the actual risk: small assumed eye movements, wide ranges of permitted exposure durations per risk group as well as safety margins between limits and injury thresholds. For lighting and many other applications, for instance, RG2 when associated with visible light emission can probably be considered as sufficiently safe for consumer products even without warning labels. When UV emission is not an issue, it can be argued that for regular lamps and luminaires, risk group classification does not appear to be necessary. We also argue that it is not justified to consider LEDs differently than other, conventional light sources in a discussion about retinal hazards.The international lamp safety standard IEC 62471 “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems” defines criteria to classify lamps into one of four risk groups (exempt, RG1, RG2, RG3). RG3 is referred to as “high risk” and is usually not considered as appropriate as a consumer product unless made safe by the housing (the luminaire or the lamp system). While the exempt group and RG1 is usually accepted as “safe”, there are concerns – particularly for LEDs – if RG2 is appropriate for lighting of rooms or streets, or as consumer products without a warning label. To support a balanced view of the actual risk associated to the use of a product, this paper discusses the rules of how to determine the risk group. Strictly speaking IEC 62471:2006 requires risk group classification only for lamps and not for luminaires or lamp systems. Due to different reasons, the risk group might not reflect the actual risk: small assumed eye movements, wide ranges of permitted exposure durations per risk group as well as saf...\",\"PeriodicalId\":118257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Laser Safety Conference\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Laser Safety Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2351/1.5118592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Laser Safety Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2351/1.5118592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

国际灯具安全标准IEC 62471“灯具和灯具系统的光生物安全”定义了将灯具分为四个风险组(豁免,RG1, RG2, RG3)之一的标准。RG3被称为“高风险”,通常不被认为是合适的消费品,除非其外壳(灯具或灯系统)是安全的。虽然豁免组和RG1通常被认为是“安全的”,但如果RG2适用于房间或街道照明,或者作为没有警告标签的消费产品,人们会担心——尤其是led。为了支持与产品使用相关的实际风险的平衡视图,本文讨论了如何确定风险组的规则。严格来说,IEC 62471:2006只要求灯具的风险组别分类,而不要求灯具或灯具系统的风险组别分类。由于不同的原因,风险组可能不能反映实际风险:假设的眼球运动小,每个风险组允许的暴露时间范围大,以及极限和伤害阈值之间的安全边际。例如,对于照明和许多其他应用,当RG2与可见光发射相关时,即使没有警告标签,也可能被认为对消费品足够安全。当紫外线辐射不是一个问题时,可以认为,对于普通灯具和灯具,风险组分类似乎没有必要。我们还认为,在讨论视网膜危害时,将led与其他传统光源区别对待是不合理的。国际灯具安全标准IEC 62471“灯具和灯具系统的光生物安全”定义了将灯具分为四个风险组(豁免,RG1, RG2, RG3)之一的标准。RG3被称为“高风险”,通常不被认为是合适的消费品,除非其外壳(灯具或灯系统)是安全的。虽然豁免组和RG1通常被认为是“安全的”,但如果RG2适用于房间或街道照明,或者作为没有警告标签的消费产品,人们会担心——尤其是led。为了支持与产品使用相关的实际风险的平衡视图,本文讨论了如何确定风险组的规则。严格来说,IEC 62471:2006只要求灯具的风险组别分类,而不要求灯具或灯具系统的风险组别分类。由于不同的原因,风险组可能不能反映实际风险:假设的眼球运动小,每个风险组允许的暴露时间范围大,以及安全……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lamp and LED safety – classification vs. realistic exposure analysis
The international lamp safety standard IEC 62471 “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems” defines criteria to classify lamps into one of four risk groups (exempt, RG1, RG2, RG3). RG3 is referred to as “high risk” and is usually not considered as appropriate as a consumer product unless made safe by the housing (the luminaire or the lamp system). While the exempt group and RG1 is usually accepted as “safe”, there are concerns – particularly for LEDs – if RG2 is appropriate for lighting of rooms or streets, or as consumer products without a warning label. To support a balanced view of the actual risk associated to the use of a product, this paper discusses the rules of how to determine the risk group. Strictly speaking IEC 62471:2006 requires risk group classification only for lamps and not for luminaires or lamp systems. Due to different reasons, the risk group might not reflect the actual risk: small assumed eye movements, wide ranges of permitted exposure durations per risk group as well as safety margins between limits and injury thresholds. For lighting and many other applications, for instance, RG2 when associated with visible light emission can probably be considered as sufficiently safe for consumer products even without warning labels. When UV emission is not an issue, it can be argued that for regular lamps and luminaires, risk group classification does not appear to be necessary. We also argue that it is not justified to consider LEDs differently than other, conventional light sources in a discussion about retinal hazards.The international lamp safety standard IEC 62471 “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems” defines criteria to classify lamps into one of four risk groups (exempt, RG1, RG2, RG3). RG3 is referred to as “high risk” and is usually not considered as appropriate as a consumer product unless made safe by the housing (the luminaire or the lamp system). While the exempt group and RG1 is usually accepted as “safe”, there are concerns – particularly for LEDs – if RG2 is appropriate for lighting of rooms or streets, or as consumer products without a warning label. To support a balanced view of the actual risk associated to the use of a product, this paper discusses the rules of how to determine the risk group. Strictly speaking IEC 62471:2006 requires risk group classification only for lamps and not for luminaires or lamp systems. Due to different reasons, the risk group might not reflect the actual risk: small assumed eye movements, wide ranges of permitted exposure durations per risk group as well as saf...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信