选择数字模拟器

J. Hillawi
{"title":"选择数字模拟器","authors":"J. Hillawi","doi":"10.1109/ASPDAC.1997.600211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarises the second in a series of benchmarking efforts conducted by DA Solutions between August 1995 and April 1996, for VHDL and Verilog simulators. The paper discusses the methodology used and the results of an independent public benchmark for leading VHDL and Verilog simulators, for RTL, Gate, VITAL and Co-simulations products. The paper also makes performance comparisons between VHDL and Verilog technologies and between PC and UNIX solutions.","PeriodicalId":242487,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ASP-DAC '97: Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing a digital simulator\",\"authors\":\"J. Hillawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASPDAC.1997.600211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper summarises the second in a series of benchmarking efforts conducted by DA Solutions between August 1995 and April 1996, for VHDL and Verilog simulators. The paper discusses the methodology used and the results of an independent public benchmark for leading VHDL and Verilog simulators, for RTL, Gate, VITAL and Co-simulations products. The paper also makes performance comparisons between VHDL and Verilog technologies and between PC and UNIX solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":242487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of ASP-DAC '97: Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of ASP-DAC '97: Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.1997.600211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ASP-DAC '97: Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPDAC.1997.600211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文总结了1995年8月至1996年4月期间由DA Solutions针对VHDL和Verilog模拟器进行的一系列基准测试工作中的第二部分。本文讨论了领先的VHDL和Verilog模拟器的方法和独立公共基准测试结果,用于RTL, Gate, VITAL和co -simulation产品。本文还比较了VHDL和Verilog技术以及PC和UNIX解决方案的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choosing a digital simulator
This paper summarises the second in a series of benchmarking efforts conducted by DA Solutions between August 1995 and April 1996, for VHDL and Verilog simulators. The paper discusses the methodology used and the results of an independent public benchmark for leading VHDL and Verilog simulators, for RTL, Gate, VITAL and Co-simulations products. The paper also makes performance comparisons between VHDL and Verilog technologies and between PC and UNIX solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信