Justin A. Rectenwald, Philip M. Coppola, Theron M. Terhune, D. C. Sisson, J. Martin
{"title":"大角猫头鹰在乔治亚州西南部北部山齿鹑狩猎场的日活动","authors":"Justin A. Rectenwald, Philip M. Coppola, Theron M. Terhune, D. C. Sisson, J. Martin","doi":"10.7290/nqsp09hipo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding interactions between prey species and their predators is essential to discerning the ecology and management fundamentals of a species. Great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus) have long been considered an opportunistic predator of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; hereafter, bobwhite) and recent studies have demonstrated that bobwhite survival is reduced at higher great-horned owl densities (Rectenwald et al. 2021). Managers on quail properties often mechanically remove live oak (Quercus virginiana) hammocks as part of larger predation management plans to reduce the amount of suitable predator habitat. While scattered live oaks are typically left for aesthetic purposes, these serve as preferred day roosts and hunting perches for great-horned owls. To improve bobwhite survival and fitness, managers on quail properties broadcast supplemental grain along designated trails at a density of 2.4 km/40.5 ha of upland habitat. From the peak of bobwhite brooding season to the end of the breeding season (i.e., Jun–Sep), it is common for managers to switch from broadcasting grain from feed trails to broadcasting grain from mowed roads to reduce tractor activity in obscured cover where broods or nests may be run over and destroyed. Bobwhite are potentially at higher risk for predation where live oak hammocks are intersected by feed trails due to increased exposure time in areas with higher predator occurrence. Additionally, bobwhite may be at higher predation risk when feeding on mowed roads in the summer, particularly when in close proximity to live oaks, due to the lack of screening cover from opportunistic owls perched above. We evaluated the probability of use for great-horned owls in relation to live oak hammocks, feed trails, and roads that are fed in the summer. We compared use versus availability for landscape features using a resource selection function in a Bayesian framework. As part of a larger study detecting all raptors that were threat-specific to bobwhite, driving surveys using line-transect distance sampling on a 32.2-km route were conducted twice per month from September 2014–December 2020 between 0800–1000 at a speed of 16 km/hr. The surveys encompassed a 5,400-ha privately owned property in Baker County, Georgia, USA. Surveys were conducted only on days with fair weather (i.e., no fog or rain). When great-horned owls were visually detected, their location was recorded on a Global Positioning System (GPS). Great-horned owl density on the property averaged approximately 0.86 owls/km2 during the bobwhite breeding season and 0.58 owls/km2 in the non-breeding season (Rectenwald et al. 2021). The site was 60% upland pine (Pinus elliottii, P. palustris, P. taeda), 20% fallow field, 10% pine for timber production, 5% live oak, and 5% wooded wetland. Habitat features were delineated using satellite imagery and GPS units. Random locations were generated to determine resource availability and we used observed locations in a logistic model using vague priors to estimate probability of use with increasing distance from landscape features. 1 Rectenwald et al.: Occurrence of Great-horned Owls on Bobwhite Hunting Properties","PeriodicalId":205881,"journal":{"name":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diurnal Occurrence of Great-Horned Owls on Northern Bobwhite Hunting Properties in Southwest Georgia\",\"authors\":\"Justin A. Rectenwald, Philip M. Coppola, Theron M. Terhune, D. C. Sisson, J. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.7290/nqsp09hipo\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding interactions between prey species and their predators is essential to discerning the ecology and management fundamentals of a species. Great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus) have long been considered an opportunistic predator of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; hereafter, bobwhite) and recent studies have demonstrated that bobwhite survival is reduced at higher great-horned owl densities (Rectenwald et al. 2021). Managers on quail properties often mechanically remove live oak (Quercus virginiana) hammocks as part of larger predation management plans to reduce the amount of suitable predator habitat. While scattered live oaks are typically left for aesthetic purposes, these serve as preferred day roosts and hunting perches for great-horned owls. To improve bobwhite survival and fitness, managers on quail properties broadcast supplemental grain along designated trails at a density of 2.4 km/40.5 ha of upland habitat. From the peak of bobwhite brooding season to the end of the breeding season (i.e., Jun–Sep), it is common for managers to switch from broadcasting grain from feed trails to broadcasting grain from mowed roads to reduce tractor activity in obscured cover where broods or nests may be run over and destroyed. Bobwhite are potentially at higher risk for predation where live oak hammocks are intersected by feed trails due to increased exposure time in areas with higher predator occurrence. Additionally, bobwhite may be at higher predation risk when feeding on mowed roads in the summer, particularly when in close proximity to live oaks, due to the lack of screening cover from opportunistic owls perched above. We evaluated the probability of use for great-horned owls in relation to live oak hammocks, feed trails, and roads that are fed in the summer. We compared use versus availability for landscape features using a resource selection function in a Bayesian framework. As part of a larger study detecting all raptors that were threat-specific to bobwhite, driving surveys using line-transect distance sampling on a 32.2-km route were conducted twice per month from September 2014–December 2020 between 0800–1000 at a speed of 16 km/hr. The surveys encompassed a 5,400-ha privately owned property in Baker County, Georgia, USA. Surveys were conducted only on days with fair weather (i.e., no fog or rain). When great-horned owls were visually detected, their location was recorded on a Global Positioning System (GPS). Great-horned owl density on the property averaged approximately 0.86 owls/km2 during the bobwhite breeding season and 0.58 owls/km2 in the non-breeding season (Rectenwald et al. 2021). The site was 60% upland pine (Pinus elliottii, P. palustris, P. taeda), 20% fallow field, 10% pine for timber production, 5% live oak, and 5% wooded wetland. Habitat features were delineated using satellite imagery and GPS units. Random locations were generated to determine resource availability and we used observed locations in a logistic model using vague priors to estimate probability of use with increasing distance from landscape features. 1 Rectenwald et al.: Occurrence of Great-horned Owls on Bobwhite Hunting Properties\",\"PeriodicalId\":205881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Quail Symposium Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Quail Symposium Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7290/nqsp09hipo\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7290/nqsp09hipo","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
了解被捕食物种和它们的捕食者之间的相互作用对于辨别一个物种的生态学和管理基础是必不可少的。大角猫头鹰(Bubo virginianus)一直被认为是北山齿鹑(Colinus virginianus;最近的研究表明,在大角猫头鹰密度较高的情况下,山齿鹑的存活率会降低(Rectenwald et al. 2021)。管理鹌鹑的人经常机械地移走活橡树(维吉尼亚栎)吊床,作为更大的捕食者管理计划的一部分,以减少适合捕食者栖息地的数量。虽然分散的活橡树通常是出于审美目的而留下的,但这些橡树是大角猫头鹰首选的日间栖息和狩猎栖息地。为了提高山齿鹑的存活率和适应性,鹌鹑养殖场的管理者沿着指定的小路以2.4公里/40.5公顷的密度播撒补充谷物。从山齿鹑繁殖季节的高峰期到繁殖季节结束(即6 - 9月),管理人员通常会从从饲料小道上播撒谷物切换到从修剪过的道路上播撒谷物,以减少拖拉机在隐蔽的掩蔽处的活动,因为这些掩蔽处可能会碾过和破坏孵蛋或巢穴。在橡树吊床与饲料路径相交的地方,山齿鹑被捕食的风险可能更高,因为在捕食者发生率较高的地区,暴露时间增加。此外,夏季在修剪过的道路上觅食时,山齿鹑被捕食的风险可能更高,尤其是在靠近活橡树的地方,因为缺乏栖息在上面的机会主义猫头鹰的掩护。我们评估了大角猫头鹰与活橡木吊床、饲料小径和夏季饲料道路的使用可能性。我们使用贝叶斯框架中的资源选择函数比较了景观特征的使用与可用性。作为一项更大的研究的一部分,检测所有对山齿鹑有特定威胁的猛禽,从2014年9月至2020年12月,在一条32.2公里的路线上,以16公里/小时的速度,使用样线距离采样,每月进行两次驾驶调查。该调查包括位于美国乔治亚州贝克县的一块5400公顷的私有土地。调查只在天气晴朗的日子进行(即没有雾或雨)。当大角猫头鹰被肉眼发现时,它们的位置被记录在全球定位系统(GPS)上。在山齿鹑繁殖期,大角猫头鹰的平均密度约为0.86只/平方公里,非繁殖期为0.58只/平方公里(Rectenwald et al. 2021)。该遗址为60%的高地松(湿地松、palustris和P. taeda), 20%的休闲地,10%的木材生产松,5%的活橡树和5%的树木湿地。利用卫星图像和GPS单元圈定生境特征。生成随机位置来确定资源的可用性,我们使用逻辑模型中观察到的位置,使用模糊先验来估计与景观特征距离增加的使用概率。1 Rectenwald等人:大角猫头鹰在山齿鹑狩猎地的出现
Diurnal Occurrence of Great-Horned Owls on Northern Bobwhite Hunting Properties in Southwest Georgia
Understanding interactions between prey species and their predators is essential to discerning the ecology and management fundamentals of a species. Great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus) have long been considered an opportunistic predator of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus; hereafter, bobwhite) and recent studies have demonstrated that bobwhite survival is reduced at higher great-horned owl densities (Rectenwald et al. 2021). Managers on quail properties often mechanically remove live oak (Quercus virginiana) hammocks as part of larger predation management plans to reduce the amount of suitable predator habitat. While scattered live oaks are typically left for aesthetic purposes, these serve as preferred day roosts and hunting perches for great-horned owls. To improve bobwhite survival and fitness, managers on quail properties broadcast supplemental grain along designated trails at a density of 2.4 km/40.5 ha of upland habitat. From the peak of bobwhite brooding season to the end of the breeding season (i.e., Jun–Sep), it is common for managers to switch from broadcasting grain from feed trails to broadcasting grain from mowed roads to reduce tractor activity in obscured cover where broods or nests may be run over and destroyed. Bobwhite are potentially at higher risk for predation where live oak hammocks are intersected by feed trails due to increased exposure time in areas with higher predator occurrence. Additionally, bobwhite may be at higher predation risk when feeding on mowed roads in the summer, particularly when in close proximity to live oaks, due to the lack of screening cover from opportunistic owls perched above. We evaluated the probability of use for great-horned owls in relation to live oak hammocks, feed trails, and roads that are fed in the summer. We compared use versus availability for landscape features using a resource selection function in a Bayesian framework. As part of a larger study detecting all raptors that were threat-specific to bobwhite, driving surveys using line-transect distance sampling on a 32.2-km route were conducted twice per month from September 2014–December 2020 between 0800–1000 at a speed of 16 km/hr. The surveys encompassed a 5,400-ha privately owned property in Baker County, Georgia, USA. Surveys were conducted only on days with fair weather (i.e., no fog or rain). When great-horned owls were visually detected, their location was recorded on a Global Positioning System (GPS). Great-horned owl density on the property averaged approximately 0.86 owls/km2 during the bobwhite breeding season and 0.58 owls/km2 in the non-breeding season (Rectenwald et al. 2021). The site was 60% upland pine (Pinus elliottii, P. palustris, P. taeda), 20% fallow field, 10% pine for timber production, 5% live oak, and 5% wooded wetland. Habitat features were delineated using satellite imagery and GPS units. Random locations were generated to determine resource availability and we used observed locations in a logistic model using vague priors to estimate probability of use with increasing distance from landscape features. 1 Rectenwald et al.: Occurrence of Great-horned Owls on Bobwhite Hunting Properties