{"title":"切片平面图面积最小化的最优算法","authors":"W. Shi","doi":"10.1109/ICCAD.1995.480160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional algorithm of L. Stockmeyer (1983) for area minimization of slicing floorplans has time (and space) complexity O(n/sup 2/) in the worst case, or O(n log n) for balanced slicing. For more than a decade, it is considered the best possible. In this paper, we present a new algorithm of worst-case time (and space) complexity O(n log n), where n is the total number of realizations for the basic blocks, regardless whether the slicing is balanced or not. We also prove /spl Omega/(n log n) is the lower bound and the time complexity of any area minimization algorithm. Therefore, the new algorithm not only finds the optimal realization, but also has an optimal running time.","PeriodicalId":367501,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An optimal algorithm for area minimization of slicing floorplans\",\"authors\":\"W. Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCAD.1995.480160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional algorithm of L. Stockmeyer (1983) for area minimization of slicing floorplans has time (and space) complexity O(n/sup 2/) in the worst case, or O(n log n) for balanced slicing. For more than a decade, it is considered the best possible. In this paper, we present a new algorithm of worst-case time (and space) complexity O(n log n), where n is the total number of realizations for the basic blocks, regardless whether the slicing is balanced or not. We also prove /spl Omega/(n log n) is the lower bound and the time complexity of any area minimization algorithm. Therefore, the new algorithm not only finds the optimal realization, but also has an optimal running time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.1995.480160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAD.1995.480160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An optimal algorithm for area minimization of slicing floorplans
The traditional algorithm of L. Stockmeyer (1983) for area minimization of slicing floorplans has time (and space) complexity O(n/sup 2/) in the worst case, or O(n log n) for balanced slicing. For more than a decade, it is considered the best possible. In this paper, we present a new algorithm of worst-case time (and space) complexity O(n log n), where n is the total number of realizations for the basic blocks, regardless whether the slicing is balanced or not. We also prove /spl Omega/(n log n) is the lower bound and the time complexity of any area minimization algorithm. Therefore, the new algorithm not only finds the optimal realization, but also has an optimal running time.