残疾人:打破障碍

The Report on the World Social Situation 2018 Pub Date : 2018-09-07 DOI:10.18356/c107798c-en

Leslie Salzman

{"title":"残疾人:打破障碍","authors":"Leslie Salzman","doi":"10.18356/c107798c-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................522 I. GUARDIANSHIP AS A VIOLATION OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF THE ADA ...........................................................................................................................526 A. Government Service, Program, or Activity .................................................528 B. “Qualified Individuals with Disabilities” ...................................................531 C. Is the Integration Mandate Properly Applied to the Experience of Individuals Living in the Community If They Are Not at Real Risk of Institutionalization? .................................................................................532 D. Remaining Hurdles in Olmstead Challenges to Guardianship................534 II. USING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS TO CHALLENGE OR LIMIT GUARDIANSHIP ..........................................................................................................538 A. Nature and Duration of Guardianship: Jackson v. Indiana and Youngberg v. Romeo ...................................................................................540 1. Scope of Order Must Bear Some Reasonable Relationship to Its Purpose .....................................................................................540 2. The Obligation To Provide Training and Skills Development and To Limit the Duration of Guardianship .......544 a. Training and Skills Development .......................................545 b. Challenge to Unlimited Duration of the Guardianship Order .............................................................546 B. Does the Court’s Decision in Obergefell v. Hodges Provide a Substantive Due Process Path to the Recognition of Universal Legal Capacity? ........................................................................................................548 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................554","PeriodicalId":368993,"journal":{"name":"The Report on the World Social Situation 2018","volume":"366 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persons with disabilities: Breaking down barriers\",\"authors\":\"Leslie Salzman\",\"doi\":\"10.18356/c107798c-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................522 I. GUARDIANSHIP AS A VIOLATION OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF THE ADA ...........................................................................................................................526 A. Government Service, Program, or Activity .................................................528 B. “Qualified Individuals with Disabilities” ...................................................531 C. Is the Integration Mandate Properly Applied to the Experience of Individuals Living in the Community If They Are Not at Real Risk of Institutionalization? .................................................................................532 D. Remaining Hurdles in Olmstead Challenges to Guardianship................534 II. USING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS TO CHALLENGE OR LIMIT GUARDIANSHIP ..........................................................................................................538 A. Nature and Duration of Guardianship: Jackson v. Indiana and Youngberg v. Romeo ...................................................................................540 1. Scope of Order Must Bear Some Reasonable Relationship to Its Purpose .....................................................................................540 2. The Obligation To Provide Training and Skills Development and To Limit the Duration of Guardianship .......544 a. Training and Skills Development .......................................545 b. Challenge to Unlimited Duration of the Guardianship Order .............................................................546 B. Does the Court’s Decision in Obergefell v. Hodges Provide a Substantive Due Process Path to the Recognition of Universal Legal Capacity? ........................................................................................................548 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................554\",\"PeriodicalId\":368993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Report on the World Social Situation 2018\",\"volume\":\"366 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Report on the World Social Situation 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18356/c107798c-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Report on the World Social Situation 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18356/c107798c-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

介绍 ................................................................................................................. 522年即监护作为集成的违反《美国残疾人法》的授权 ........................................................................................................................... 526年一个。政府服务、程序或活动 ................................................. 528年“合格残疾人 ” ................................................... 531年C.如果生活在社区中的个人没有真正的制度化风险，那么整合任务是否适当地适用于他们的经历?................................................................................. 532年D.奥姆斯特德对监护权的挑战................5342使用实质性正当程序来挑战或限制监护 .......................................................................................................... 538年一个。自然和监护时间:杰克逊诉印第安纳州和Youngberg诉罗密欧 ...................................................................................540年1。秩序的范围必须承担一些合理的关系,它的目的 .....................................................................................540 2。提供培训和技能发展以及限制监护期限的义务.......544年,培训和技能发展 .......................................545 b,监护秩序的挑战无限的时间 ............................................................. 546年法院在奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案中的判决是否为承认普遍法律行为能力提供了一条实质性的正当程序途径?........................................................................................................ 548年结论 ...................................................................................................................... 554年

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Persons with disabilities: Breaking down barriers

INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................522 I. GUARDIANSHIP AS A VIOLATION OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF THE ADA ...........................................................................................................................526 A. Government Service, Program, or Activity .................................................528 B. “Qualified Individuals with Disabilities” ...................................................531 C. Is the Integration Mandate Properly Applied to the Experience of Individuals Living in the Community If They Are Not at Real Risk of Institutionalization? .................................................................................532 D. Remaining Hurdles in Olmstead Challenges to Guardianship................534 II. USING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS TO CHALLENGE OR LIMIT GUARDIANSHIP ..........................................................................................................538 A. Nature and Duration of Guardianship: Jackson v. Indiana and Youngberg v. Romeo ...................................................................................540 1. Scope of Order Must Bear Some Reasonable Relationship to Its Purpose .....................................................................................540 2. The Obligation To Provide Training and Skills Development and To Limit the Duration of Guardianship .......544 a. Training and Skills Development .......................................545 b. Challenge to Unlimited Duration of the Guardianship Order .............................................................546 B. Does the Court’s Decision in Obergefell v. Hodges Provide a Substantive Due Process Path to the Recognition of Universal Legal Capacity? ........................................................................................................548 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................554

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Report on the World Social Situation 2018

自引率

0.00%

发文量