理性主义和经验主义如何提供良好的基础?

B. Shneiderman
{"title":"理性主义和经验主义如何提供良好的基础?","authors":"B. Shneiderman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192845290.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contrast between AI and HCAI is a continuation of the 2,000-year-old clash between Aristotle’s rationalism, based on logical analyses, and Leonardo da Vinci’s empiricism, based on sensory exploration of the world. Both are valuable and worthy of understanding. Both philosophies, rationalism and empiricism, offer valuable insights, so I apply rational thinking for its strengths, but I know that balancing it with an empirical outlook helps me see other possibilities, which use observational strategies. Watching users of technology has always led me to fresh insights, so I am drawn to usability studies, interviews, naturalistic observations, and repeated weeks-long case studies with users doing their work to complement the rationalist approach of controlled experiments in laboratory settings.","PeriodicalId":159193,"journal":{"name":"Human-Centered AI","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Rationalism and Empiricism Provide Sound Foundations?\",\"authors\":\"B. Shneiderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780192845290.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The contrast between AI and HCAI is a continuation of the 2,000-year-old clash between Aristotle’s rationalism, based on logical analyses, and Leonardo da Vinci’s empiricism, based on sensory exploration of the world. Both are valuable and worthy of understanding. Both philosophies, rationalism and empiricism, offer valuable insights, so I apply rational thinking for its strengths, but I know that balancing it with an empirical outlook helps me see other possibilities, which use observational strategies. Watching users of technology has always led me to fresh insights, so I am drawn to usability studies, interviews, naturalistic observations, and repeated weeks-long case studies with users doing their work to complement the rationalist approach of controlled experiments in laboratory settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human-Centered AI\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human-Centered AI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-Centered AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能和人工智能之间的对比是亚里士多德基于逻辑分析的理性主义和达芬奇基于感官探索世界的经验主义之间2000年冲突的延续。两者都是有价值的,值得理解。理性主义和经验主义这两种哲学都提供了有价值的见解,所以我利用理性思维的优势,但我知道,将理性思维与经验主义观点相平衡,有助于我看到使用观察策略的其他可能性。观察技术的用户总是让我有新的见解,所以我被可用性研究、访谈、自然观察和重复的长达数周的案例研究所吸引,这些案例研究是对实验室环境中受控实验的理性主义方法的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Do Rationalism and Empiricism Provide Sound Foundations?
The contrast between AI and HCAI is a continuation of the 2,000-year-old clash between Aristotle’s rationalism, based on logical analyses, and Leonardo da Vinci’s empiricism, based on sensory exploration of the world. Both are valuable and worthy of understanding. Both philosophies, rationalism and empiricism, offer valuable insights, so I apply rational thinking for its strengths, but I know that balancing it with an empirical outlook helps me see other possibilities, which use observational strategies. Watching users of technology has always led me to fresh insights, so I am drawn to usability studies, interviews, naturalistic observations, and repeated weeks-long case studies with users doing their work to complement the rationalist approach of controlled experiments in laboratory settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信