面部情绪识别技术综述

V. Jacintha, Judy Simon, S. Tamilarasu, R. Thamizhmani, K. Thanga yogesh, J. Nagarajan
{"title":"面部情绪识别技术综述","authors":"V. Jacintha, Judy Simon, S. Tamilarasu, R. Thamizhmani, K. Thanga yogesh, J. Nagarajan","doi":"10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8698067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a major phase skin Recognition, together with elliptical boundary model, is accomplished. Further, facial Feature Identification process is carried out. The next step is to initiate a technique for extorting geometric and anthropometric facial characteristics. At last we train as well as test the classifiers. We accomplished a categorization precision of 58.6% for six types of emotions (bliss, anguish, curiosity, despair, fury, hatred) and mean efficiency of 96.8% for two emotions (bliss and curiosity).The current study utilizes interest points as markers in face images that are damaged by few emotions as well as correlates its location to that of a normal expression. The outputs are viewed in contrast with Paul Ekman’s FACS (Facial Action Coding System) tool to check on the efficacy of the algorithm .The automated identification of face expressions utilizing image template matching method faces various issues pertaining to facial features and recording circumstances. Although this field has reached great heights , choosing of features as well as categorization method for emotion identification , till today remains an unsolved mystery. To suppress feature outliers, the proposed technique comprises of pixel normalization which is used to eliminate intensity offsets backed up using a Min-Max metric in a nearest neighbor classifier. The proposed Min-Max classification technique has an efficiency of 92.85% to 98.57% when checked on JAFFE database. Classification task also done using KNN, SVM and Bagged Tree Classifier.","PeriodicalId":194369,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review on Facial Emotion Recognition Techniques\",\"authors\":\"V. Jacintha, Judy Simon, S. Tamilarasu, R. Thamizhmani, K. Thanga yogesh, J. Nagarajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8698067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a major phase skin Recognition, together with elliptical boundary model, is accomplished. Further, facial Feature Identification process is carried out. The next step is to initiate a technique for extorting geometric and anthropometric facial characteristics. At last we train as well as test the classifiers. We accomplished a categorization precision of 58.6% for six types of emotions (bliss, anguish, curiosity, despair, fury, hatred) and mean efficiency of 96.8% for two emotions (bliss and curiosity).The current study utilizes interest points as markers in face images that are damaged by few emotions as well as correlates its location to that of a normal expression. The outputs are viewed in contrast with Paul Ekman’s FACS (Facial Action Coding System) tool to check on the efficacy of the algorithm .The automated identification of face expressions utilizing image template matching method faces various issues pertaining to facial features and recording circumstances. Although this field has reached great heights , choosing of features as well as categorization method for emotion identification , till today remains an unsolved mystery. To suppress feature outliers, the proposed technique comprises of pixel normalization which is used to eliminate intensity offsets backed up using a Min-Max metric in a nearest neighbor classifier. The proposed Min-Max classification technique has an efficiency of 92.85% to 98.57% when checked on JAFFE database. Classification task also done using KNN, SVM and Bagged Tree Classifier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8698067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSP.2019.8698067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

作为主要阶段,皮肤识别与椭圆边界模型一起完成。进一步,进行人脸特征识别处理。下一步是启动一项技术敲诈几何和人体特征的面部特征。最后对分类器进行了训练和测试。我们完成了六种情绪(幸福、痛苦、好奇、绝望、愤怒、仇恨)的分类精度为58.6%,两种情绪(幸福和好奇)的平均效率为96.8%。目前的研究利用兴趣点作为被少数情绪破坏的面部图像的标记,并将其位置与正常表情的位置联系起来。将输出结果与Paul Ekman的FACS(面部动作编码系统)工具进行对比,以检查算法的有效性。利用图像模板匹配方法自动识别面部表情面临与面部特征和记录环境有关的各种问题。尽管这一领域已经发展到一定的高度,但情感识别的特征选择和分类方法至今仍是一个未解之谜。为了抑制特征异常值,所提出的技术包括像素归一化,该归一化用于消除在最近邻分类器中使用最小-最大度量备份的强度偏移。在JAFFE数据库上验证,所提出的最小-最大分类技术的分类效率为92.85% ~ 98.57%。分类任务还使用KNN、SVM和袋树分类器完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review on Facial Emotion Recognition Techniques
As a major phase skin Recognition, together with elliptical boundary model, is accomplished. Further, facial Feature Identification process is carried out. The next step is to initiate a technique for extorting geometric and anthropometric facial characteristics. At last we train as well as test the classifiers. We accomplished a categorization precision of 58.6% for six types of emotions (bliss, anguish, curiosity, despair, fury, hatred) and mean efficiency of 96.8% for two emotions (bliss and curiosity).The current study utilizes interest points as markers in face images that are damaged by few emotions as well as correlates its location to that of a normal expression. The outputs are viewed in contrast with Paul Ekman’s FACS (Facial Action Coding System) tool to check on the efficacy of the algorithm .The automated identification of face expressions utilizing image template matching method faces various issues pertaining to facial features and recording circumstances. Although this field has reached great heights , choosing of features as well as categorization method for emotion identification , till today remains an unsolved mystery. To suppress feature outliers, the proposed technique comprises of pixel normalization which is used to eliminate intensity offsets backed up using a Min-Max metric in a nearest neighbor classifier. The proposed Min-Max classification technique has an efficiency of 92.85% to 98.57% when checked on JAFFE database. Classification task also done using KNN, SVM and Bagged Tree Classifier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信