保持真实:西蒙·奥尔蒂斯抵制“旧金山印第安人”

J. Haladay
{"title":"保持真实:西蒙·奥尔蒂斯抵制“旧金山印第安人”","authors":"J. Haladay","doi":"10.5749/WICAZOSAREVIEW.29.2.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F A L L 2 0 1 4 W I C A Z O S A R E V I E W A pervasive theme in Acoma author Simon Ortiz’s extensive body of literature across time is that of maintaining Indigenous identity in the aftermath of colonization, from its earliest predations to its ongoing assaults across seven centuries. “We can’t take Indigeneity for granted,” Ortiz insists in the foreword to American Indian Literary Nationalism. “It is hard and tough enough to be Indigenous, especially against such heavy political, social, and cultural odds. On the other hand, it is too easy to be Indigenous,” Ortiz continues, “especially to be the very image of the Indian who is a foil and fool to the dominant culture and society.”1 To maintain authentic Indigenous identity is no simple matter, as Ortiz’s writing and speaking consistently express, and no single feature of Indigeneity— original languages, living within original homelands, even oral traditions— can be pointed to as representing an individual’s or a community’s “cultural authenticity.” Rather, it is the tightly woven fabric of some or all of these features, and others besides, which Ortiz understands to identify contemporary Indigenous peoples. The reasons for this, Ortiz asserts, are “because identity has to do with a way of life that has its own particularities, patterns, uniqueness, structures, and energy. Because Indigenous identity cannot simply be attributed to only one quality, aspect, or function of culture. Be cause identity has to be relevant and pertinent to other elements and factors having to do with land, culture, and community of Indigenous people.”2 Ortiz’s philosophy connects directly with the United Nations Keeping It Real Simon Ortiz Resists “The San Francisco Indians”","PeriodicalId":343767,"journal":{"name":"Wicazo Sa Review","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keeping It Real: Simon Ortiz Resists “The San Francisco Indians”\",\"authors\":\"J. Haladay\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/WICAZOSAREVIEW.29.2.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"F A L L 2 0 1 4 W I C A Z O S A R E V I E W A pervasive theme in Acoma author Simon Ortiz’s extensive body of literature across time is that of maintaining Indigenous identity in the aftermath of colonization, from its earliest predations to its ongoing assaults across seven centuries. “We can’t take Indigeneity for granted,” Ortiz insists in the foreword to American Indian Literary Nationalism. “It is hard and tough enough to be Indigenous, especially against such heavy political, social, and cultural odds. On the other hand, it is too easy to be Indigenous,” Ortiz continues, “especially to be the very image of the Indian who is a foil and fool to the dominant culture and society.”1 To maintain authentic Indigenous identity is no simple matter, as Ortiz’s writing and speaking consistently express, and no single feature of Indigeneity— original languages, living within original homelands, even oral traditions— can be pointed to as representing an individual’s or a community’s “cultural authenticity.” Rather, it is the tightly woven fabric of some or all of these features, and others besides, which Ortiz understands to identify contemporary Indigenous peoples. The reasons for this, Ortiz asserts, are “because identity has to do with a way of life that has its own particularities, patterns, uniqueness, structures, and energy. Because Indigenous identity cannot simply be attributed to only one quality, aspect, or function of culture. Be cause identity has to be relevant and pertinent to other elements and factors having to do with land, culture, and community of Indigenous people.”2 Ortiz’s philosophy connects directly with the United Nations Keeping It Real Simon Ortiz Resists “The San Francisco Indians”\",\"PeriodicalId\":343767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wicazo Sa Review\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wicazo Sa Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/WICAZOSAREVIEW.29.2.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wicazo Sa Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/WICAZOSAREVIEW.29.2.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在阿科马作家西蒙·奥尔蒂斯(Simon Ortiz)跨越时间的广泛文学作品中,一个普遍的主题是在殖民之后保持土著身份,从最早的掠夺到七个世纪以来持续不断的攻击。“我们不能把土著视为理所当然,”奥尔蒂斯在《美国印第安人文学民族主义》的前言中坚称。“做原住民已经够艰难的了,尤其是面对如此沉重的政治、社会和文化障碍。另一方面,成为土著太容易了,”奥尔蒂斯继续说,“尤其是成为印第安人的形象,成为主流文化和社会的陪衬和傻瓜。1保持真实的土著身份不是一件简单的事情,正如奥尔蒂斯的写作和讲话所一贯表达的那样,土著的任何单一特征——原始语言、生活在原始家园内,甚至口头传统——都不能被指出来代表个人或社区的“文化真实性”。更确切地说,奥尔蒂斯认为,正是这些特征中的某些或所有特征以及其他特征紧密交织在一起,才能识别当代土著民族。奥尔蒂斯断言,其原因是“因为身份与一种生活方式有关,这种生活方式有其自身的特殊性、模式、独特性、结构和能量。因为土著身份不能简单地归因于文化的一种品质、方面或功能。因为身份认同必须与其他与土地、文化和土著人民社区有关的元素和因素相关。2奥尔蒂斯的哲学与联合国直接相关保持真实西蒙·奥尔蒂斯抵制“旧金山印第安人”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keeping It Real: Simon Ortiz Resists “The San Francisco Indians”
F A L L 2 0 1 4 W I C A Z O S A R E V I E W A pervasive theme in Acoma author Simon Ortiz’s extensive body of literature across time is that of maintaining Indigenous identity in the aftermath of colonization, from its earliest predations to its ongoing assaults across seven centuries. “We can’t take Indigeneity for granted,” Ortiz insists in the foreword to American Indian Literary Nationalism. “It is hard and tough enough to be Indigenous, especially against such heavy political, social, and cultural odds. On the other hand, it is too easy to be Indigenous,” Ortiz continues, “especially to be the very image of the Indian who is a foil and fool to the dominant culture and society.”1 To maintain authentic Indigenous identity is no simple matter, as Ortiz’s writing and speaking consistently express, and no single feature of Indigeneity— original languages, living within original homelands, even oral traditions— can be pointed to as representing an individual’s or a community’s “cultural authenticity.” Rather, it is the tightly woven fabric of some or all of these features, and others besides, which Ortiz understands to identify contemporary Indigenous peoples. The reasons for this, Ortiz asserts, are “because identity has to do with a way of life that has its own particularities, patterns, uniqueness, structures, and energy. Because Indigenous identity cannot simply be attributed to only one quality, aspect, or function of culture. Be cause identity has to be relevant and pertinent to other elements and factors having to do with land, culture, and community of Indigenous people.”2 Ortiz’s philosophy connects directly with the United Nations Keeping It Real Simon Ortiz Resists “The San Francisco Indians”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信