脉冲减法多普勒与脉冲反演多普勒的比较

V. Mahue, Jean Martial Mari, Mx Tang, R. Eckersley
{"title":"脉冲减法多普勒与脉冲反演多普勒的比较","authors":"V. Mahue, Jean Martial Mari, Mx Tang, R. Eckersley","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2009.5441909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A challenge in molecular imaging with targeted contrast agents is the development of methods able to detect and distinguish microbubbles attached to regions of disease from the high background signal from freely circulating microbubbles and tissue. Combining a nonlinear contrast agent detection technique with Doppler has potential to perform this discrimination. So far, pulse inversion Doppler (PID), is able to distinguish linear from nonlinear moving scatterers by making use of the even harmonics generated by the microbubbles. However it has been shown that adherent microbubbles emit a stronger fundamental signal than freely flowing ones. In this paper, a new Doppler technique based on pulse subtraction imaging (PSD) is described and compared with PID. The results show that PSD is able to differentiate bubble motion from tissue motion and could find applications in targeted microbubble imaging. For Doppler processing conducted at the fundamental frequency, the contrast to tissue ratio (CTR) in PSD was on average 3.3 (± 0.4) times higher than PID at a mechanical index (MI) of 0.1. At the harmonic frequency, PID has shown to have a 3.1 (± 0.4) times higher CTR than PSD. The CTR has also been shown to increase with increasing MI.","PeriodicalId":368182,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of pulse subtraction Doppler and pulse inversion Doppler\",\"authors\":\"V. Mahue, Jean Martial Mari, Mx Tang, R. Eckersley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.2009.5441909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A challenge in molecular imaging with targeted contrast agents is the development of methods able to detect and distinguish microbubbles attached to regions of disease from the high background signal from freely circulating microbubbles and tissue. Combining a nonlinear contrast agent detection technique with Doppler has potential to perform this discrimination. So far, pulse inversion Doppler (PID), is able to distinguish linear from nonlinear moving scatterers by making use of the even harmonics generated by the microbubbles. However it has been shown that adherent microbubbles emit a stronger fundamental signal than freely flowing ones. In this paper, a new Doppler technique based on pulse subtraction imaging (PSD) is described and compared with PID. The results show that PSD is able to differentiate bubble motion from tissue motion and could find applications in targeted microbubble imaging. For Doppler processing conducted at the fundamental frequency, the contrast to tissue ratio (CTR) in PSD was on average 3.3 (± 0.4) times higher than PID at a mechanical index (MI) of 0.1. At the harmonic frequency, PID has shown to have a 3.1 (± 0.4) times higher CTR than PSD. The CTR has also been shown to increase with increasing MI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2009.5441909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2009.5441909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

靶向造影剂分子成像的一个挑战是能够从自由循环的微泡和组织的高背景信号中检测和区分附着在疾病区域的微泡的方法的发展。将非线性造影剂检测技术与多普勒相结合有可能进行这种区分。目前,脉冲逆多普勒(PID)可以利用微泡产生的均匀谐波来区分线性和非线性运动散射体。然而,已经证明附着的微气泡比自由流动的微气泡发出更强的基本信号。本文介绍了一种基于脉冲减成像(PSD)的新型多普勒技术,并与PID进行了比较。结果表明,PSD能够区分气泡运动和组织运动,可以在靶向微泡成像中找到应用。在基频下进行多普勒处理,在机械指数(MI)为0.1时,PSD的组织对比比(CTR)平均比PID高3.3(±0.4)倍。在谐波频率下,PID的CTR比PSD高3.1(±0.4)倍。CTR也随着心肌梗死的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of pulse subtraction Doppler and pulse inversion Doppler
A challenge in molecular imaging with targeted contrast agents is the development of methods able to detect and distinguish microbubbles attached to regions of disease from the high background signal from freely circulating microbubbles and tissue. Combining a nonlinear contrast agent detection technique with Doppler has potential to perform this discrimination. So far, pulse inversion Doppler (PID), is able to distinguish linear from nonlinear moving scatterers by making use of the even harmonics generated by the microbubbles. However it has been shown that adherent microbubbles emit a stronger fundamental signal than freely flowing ones. In this paper, a new Doppler technique based on pulse subtraction imaging (PSD) is described and compared with PID. The results show that PSD is able to differentiate bubble motion from tissue motion and could find applications in targeted microbubble imaging. For Doppler processing conducted at the fundamental frequency, the contrast to tissue ratio (CTR) in PSD was on average 3.3 (± 0.4) times higher than PID at a mechanical index (MI) of 0.1. At the harmonic frequency, PID has shown to have a 3.1 (± 0.4) times higher CTR than PSD. The CTR has also been shown to increase with increasing MI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信