从生命周期的角度看城市固体废物的填埋

W. Wanichpongpan, S. Gheewala, S. Towprayoon, C. Chiemchaisri
{"title":"从生命周期的角度看城市固体废物的填埋","authors":"W. Wanichpongpan, S. Gheewala, S. Towprayoon, C. Chiemchaisri","doi":"10.1109/ECODIM.2003.1322656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to compare the greenhouse gas emissions between recycling of MSW recyclable value wastes and landfilling in Thailand. Methane emissions from the organic fraction of waste in landfills contribute to global warming whereas for recycling, the global warming potential comes from the energy consumption of the recycling process. The whole life cycle of the two scenarios is considered, including transportation. The recycling option reduces the methane emissions from landfill due to diversion of waste. The study shows that this reduction more than offsets the increase due to energy consumption in the recycling process. Apart from the reduction in global warming potential, recycling also contributes to resource conservation. Thailand has a high potential for recycling since a large proportion of the waste currently going to the landfills is actually recyclable. Two case studies of ecodesign are also considered to highlight the increase in recyclability and the benefits thereof.","PeriodicalId":217614,"journal":{"name":"2003 EcoDesign 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landfilling of municipal solid waste in a life cycle perspective\",\"authors\":\"W. Wanichpongpan, S. Gheewala, S. Towprayoon, C. Chiemchaisri\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECODIM.2003.1322656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to compare the greenhouse gas emissions between recycling of MSW recyclable value wastes and landfilling in Thailand. Methane emissions from the organic fraction of waste in landfills contribute to global warming whereas for recycling, the global warming potential comes from the energy consumption of the recycling process. The whole life cycle of the two scenarios is considered, including transportation. The recycling option reduces the methane emissions from landfill due to diversion of waste. The study shows that this reduction more than offsets the increase due to energy consumption in the recycling process. Apart from the reduction in global warming potential, recycling also contributes to resource conservation. Thailand has a high potential for recycling since a large proportion of the waste currently going to the landfills is actually recyclable. Two case studies of ecodesign are also considered to highlight the increase in recyclability and the benefits thereof.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2003 EcoDesign 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2003 EcoDesign 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECODIM.2003.1322656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 EcoDesign 3rd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECODIM.2003.1322656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较泰国城市生活垃圾回收和垃圾填埋之间的温室气体排放。垃圾填埋场的有机废弃物排放的甲烷导致全球变暖,而对于回收利用而言,全球变暖潜力来自回收过程的能源消耗。考虑了两种方案的整个生命周期,包括交通运输。由于废物的转移,回收方案减少了垃圾填埋场的甲烷排放。研究表明,这种减少远远抵消了回收过程中能源消耗的增加。除了减少全球变暖的潜力外,回收也有助于节约资源。泰国有很大的回收潜力,因为目前进入垃圾填埋场的大部分垃圾实际上是可回收的。生态设计的两个案例研究也被认为强调了可回收性的增加及其好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Landfilling of municipal solid waste in a life cycle perspective
The objective of this research is to compare the greenhouse gas emissions between recycling of MSW recyclable value wastes and landfilling in Thailand. Methane emissions from the organic fraction of waste in landfills contribute to global warming whereas for recycling, the global warming potential comes from the energy consumption of the recycling process. The whole life cycle of the two scenarios is considered, including transportation. The recycling option reduces the methane emissions from landfill due to diversion of waste. The study shows that this reduction more than offsets the increase due to energy consumption in the recycling process. Apart from the reduction in global warming potential, recycling also contributes to resource conservation. Thailand has a high potential for recycling since a large proportion of the waste currently going to the landfills is actually recyclable. Two case studies of ecodesign are also considered to highlight the increase in recyclability and the benefits thereof.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信