评估撒哈拉以南非洲和中国托运人的港口选择行为

Byungin Park
{"title":"评估撒哈拉以南非洲和中国托运人的港口选择行为","authors":"Byungin Park","doi":"10.17825/klr.2022.32.6.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The port choice is crucial in decision-making during cargo shipment, which depends on the port’s competitiveness and efficiency. This study compared the port selection factors of sub-Saharan Africa in Nigeria and Uganda to China. After analyzing the collected questionnaire with a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) model, the necessary strategies were established by comparing countries with importance-performance analysis (IPMA). First, the existing importance and analysis chart (IPMA) developed the ‘urgency index’ using the weighted average Euclidean distance and applied it to establish a strategy based on the ranking of port selection factors. This study found that the difference in evaluation by factor was clear depending on whether the port selection factor was a coastal or inland country, not a difference in economic development or port development level by country. Second, while Nigerian shippers prioritize software factors of operating characteristics, Ugandan shippers focus on more hardware port facilities or ship ports. Third, the factors of customs clearance, rapid response to customer needs, port quality, and safety and security differ significantly in the surveyed. They were representative factors that were high in importance and performance for Nigerian shippers but low in importance and performance for Ugandan shippers. However, Chinese shippers evaluated them as having high importance in terms of port quality, safety, and security factors, but their performance could have been higher. Finally, the urgency index also clearly calculated the urgency and strategic priorities, especially for factors near the boundary between the quadrants of the importance-performance matrix. The study presented the necessary implications and strategies to shipping and port companies, international institutions, trading companies, port authorities, and governments of the selected countries. Although this study evaluated the port selection characteristics of sub-Saharan shippers, it is also different from previous studies, so additional verification studies for generalization are needed to determine whether these differences are due to time differences or other causes.","PeriodicalId":430866,"journal":{"name":"Korean Logistics Research Association","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Port Choice Behaviors of Shippers in Sub-Saharan Africa and China\",\"authors\":\"Byungin Park\",\"doi\":\"10.17825/klr.2022.32.6.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The port choice is crucial in decision-making during cargo shipment, which depends on the port’s competitiveness and efficiency. This study compared the port selection factors of sub-Saharan Africa in Nigeria and Uganda to China. After analyzing the collected questionnaire with a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) model, the necessary strategies were established by comparing countries with importance-performance analysis (IPMA). First, the existing importance and analysis chart (IPMA) developed the ‘urgency index’ using the weighted average Euclidean distance and applied it to establish a strategy based on the ranking of port selection factors. This study found that the difference in evaluation by factor was clear depending on whether the port selection factor was a coastal or inland country, not a difference in economic development or port development level by country. Second, while Nigerian shippers prioritize software factors of operating characteristics, Ugandan shippers focus on more hardware port facilities or ship ports. Third, the factors of customs clearance, rapid response to customer needs, port quality, and safety and security differ significantly in the surveyed. They were representative factors that were high in importance and performance for Nigerian shippers but low in importance and performance for Ugandan shippers. However, Chinese shippers evaluated them as having high importance in terms of port quality, safety, and security factors, but their performance could have been higher. Finally, the urgency index also clearly calculated the urgency and strategic priorities, especially for factors near the boundary between the quadrants of the importance-performance matrix. The study presented the necessary implications and strategies to shipping and port companies, international institutions, trading companies, port authorities, and governments of the selected countries. Although this study evaluated the port selection characteristics of sub-Saharan shippers, it is also different from previous studies, so additional verification studies for generalization are needed to determine whether these differences are due to time differences or other causes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Logistics Research Association\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Logistics Research Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17825/klr.2022.32.6.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Logistics Research Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17825/klr.2022.32.6.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

港口选择是货物运输决策的关键,它直接关系到港口的竞争力和效率。本研究将撒哈拉以南非洲的尼日利亚和乌干达与中国的港口选择因素进行了比较。利用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对收集到的问卷进行分析,并通过重要性-绩效分析(IPMA)对各国进行比较,制定必要的策略。首先,现有的重要性与分析图(IPMA)利用加权平均欧氏距离建立了“紧急指数”,并应用该指数建立了基于港口选择因素排序的策略。本研究发现,根据港口选择因素是沿海国家还是内陆国家,不同因素的评价差异是明显的,而不是不同国家的经济发展水平或港口发展水平的差异。其次,尼日利亚托运人优先考虑运营特征的软件因素,乌干达托运人更关注硬件港口设施或船舶港口。三是通关、快速响应客户需求、口岸质量、安全保障等因素在被调查企业中存在显著差异。它们是代表性因素,对尼日利亚托运人的重要性和表现都很高,但对乌干达托运人的重要性和表现都很低。但是,在港口质量、安全、安保等方面,中国货主评价他们的重要性很高,但他们的表现本可以更高。最后,紧迫性指数还清晰地计算了紧迫性和战略优先级,特别是对于重要性-绩效矩阵象限之间边界附近的因素。这项研究向航运和港口公司、国际机构、贸易公司、港口当局和选定国家的政府提出了必要的影响和战略。虽然本研究评估了撒哈拉以南地区托运人的港口选择特征,但它与以往的研究也有所不同,因此需要进一步的验证研究来确定这些差异是由于时差还是其他原因造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Port Choice Behaviors of Shippers in Sub-Saharan Africa and China
The port choice is crucial in decision-making during cargo shipment, which depends on the port’s competitiveness and efficiency. This study compared the port selection factors of sub-Saharan Africa in Nigeria and Uganda to China. After analyzing the collected questionnaire with a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) model, the necessary strategies were established by comparing countries with importance-performance analysis (IPMA). First, the existing importance and analysis chart (IPMA) developed the ‘urgency index’ using the weighted average Euclidean distance and applied it to establish a strategy based on the ranking of port selection factors. This study found that the difference in evaluation by factor was clear depending on whether the port selection factor was a coastal or inland country, not a difference in economic development or port development level by country. Second, while Nigerian shippers prioritize software factors of operating characteristics, Ugandan shippers focus on more hardware port facilities or ship ports. Third, the factors of customs clearance, rapid response to customer needs, port quality, and safety and security differ significantly in the surveyed. They were representative factors that were high in importance and performance for Nigerian shippers but low in importance and performance for Ugandan shippers. However, Chinese shippers evaluated them as having high importance in terms of port quality, safety, and security factors, but their performance could have been higher. Finally, the urgency index also clearly calculated the urgency and strategic priorities, especially for factors near the boundary between the quadrants of the importance-performance matrix. The study presented the necessary implications and strategies to shipping and port companies, international institutions, trading companies, port authorities, and governments of the selected countries. Although this study evaluated the port selection characteristics of sub-Saharan shippers, it is also different from previous studies, so additional verification studies for generalization are needed to determine whether these differences are due to time differences or other causes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信