未来汽车发电机的拓扑结构–第二部分:优化

L. M. Lorilla, T. Keim, J. Lang, D. Perreault
{"title":"未来汽车发电机的拓扑结构–第二部分:优化","authors":"L. M. Lorilla, T. Keim, J. Lang, D. Perreault","doi":"10.1109/VPPC.2005.1554652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For pt.I see ibid., p.819-30, (2005). This paper compares the relative suitability of four different alternator topologies for use in an advanced automobile electrical system. The four candidate topologies are: the salient-and non-salient-pole wound-field synchronous alternators, the Lundell alternator, and the homopolar inductor alternator. In part I, each of the four alternators was modeled. Relative power and efficiency were evaluated based on hand calculations. Part II involves a more accurate optimization of each of these alternators for cost, subject to constraints on output and efficiency. The performance of each machine is determined both with a conventional diode rectifier bridge and also with a switched-mode boost rectifier. Mechanical finite element analyses are performed to evaluate stresses. The most cost effective machines are compared based on size, weight, and inertia. The results reveal that the Lundell and salient-pole wound-field synchronous alternators are the most cost effective. Most surprising is the finding that the Lundell is capable of meeting the challenging next-generation requirements of power and efficiency while meeting the mechanical constraints set on the machines. Also noteworthy is the fact that the switched-mode boost rectifier gives a decrease in cost of more than 10% for each of the least expensive machines","PeriodicalId":430886,"journal":{"name":"2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference","volume":"187 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topologies for Future Automotive Generators – Part II: Optimization\",\"authors\":\"L. M. Lorilla, T. Keim, J. Lang, D. Perreault\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VPPC.2005.1554652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For pt.I see ibid., p.819-30, (2005). This paper compares the relative suitability of four different alternator topologies for use in an advanced automobile electrical system. The four candidate topologies are: the salient-and non-salient-pole wound-field synchronous alternators, the Lundell alternator, and the homopolar inductor alternator. In part I, each of the four alternators was modeled. Relative power and efficiency were evaluated based on hand calculations. Part II involves a more accurate optimization of each of these alternators for cost, subject to constraints on output and efficiency. The performance of each machine is determined both with a conventional diode rectifier bridge and also with a switched-mode boost rectifier. Mechanical finite element analyses are performed to evaluate stresses. The most cost effective machines are compared based on size, weight, and inertia. The results reveal that the Lundell and salient-pole wound-field synchronous alternators are the most cost effective. Most surprising is the finding that the Lundell is capable of meeting the challenging next-generation requirements of power and efficiency while meeting the mechanical constraints set on the machines. Also noteworthy is the fact that the switched-mode boost rectifier gives a decrease in cost of more than 10% for each of the least expensive machines\",\"PeriodicalId\":430886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference\",\"volume\":\"187 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2005.1554652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2005.1554652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

参见同上,第819-30页,(2005)。本文比较了四种不同的交流发电机拓扑结构在先进汽车电气系统中的相对适用性。四种候选拓扑是:显著极和非显著极绕场同步交流发电机、Lundell交流发电机和同极电感交流发电机。在第一部分中,对四个交流发电机中的每一个进行了建模。相对功率和效率的评估基于手工计算。第二部分涉及更准确地优化每一个这些交流发电机的成本,受制于输出和效率的限制。每台机器的性能都是由传统的二极管整流桥和开关模式升压整流决定的。进行机械有限元分析以评估应力。最具成本效益的机器是根据尺寸、重量和惯性进行比较的。结果表明,Lundell和凸极绕场同步发电机是最具成本效益的。最令人惊讶的是,Lundell能够满足下一代对功率和效率的挑战性要求,同时满足机器上设定的机械限制。同样值得注意的是,开关模式升压整流器为每台最便宜的机器提供了超过10%的成本下降
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topologies for Future Automotive Generators – Part II: Optimization
For pt.I see ibid., p.819-30, (2005). This paper compares the relative suitability of four different alternator topologies for use in an advanced automobile electrical system. The four candidate topologies are: the salient-and non-salient-pole wound-field synchronous alternators, the Lundell alternator, and the homopolar inductor alternator. In part I, each of the four alternators was modeled. Relative power and efficiency were evaluated based on hand calculations. Part II involves a more accurate optimization of each of these alternators for cost, subject to constraints on output and efficiency. The performance of each machine is determined both with a conventional diode rectifier bridge and also with a switched-mode boost rectifier. Mechanical finite element analyses are performed to evaluate stresses. The most cost effective machines are compared based on size, weight, and inertia. The results reveal that the Lundell and salient-pole wound-field synchronous alternators are the most cost effective. Most surprising is the finding that the Lundell is capable of meeting the challenging next-generation requirements of power and efficiency while meeting the mechanical constraints set on the machines. Also noteworthy is the fact that the switched-mode boost rectifier gives a decrease in cost of more than 10% for each of the least expensive machines
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信